scholarly journals Effect of wall temperature on separation bubble size in laminar hypersonic shock/boundary layer interaction flows

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 168781401988555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amjad A Pasha ◽  
Khalid A Juhany
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Layer Interaction ◽  
Shock Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Hypersonic Shock ◽  
Bubble Length

At hypersonic speeds, the external wall temperatures of an aerospace vehicle vary significantly. As a result, there is a considerable heat transfer variation between the boundary layer and the wall of the hypersonic vehicle. In this article, numerical computations are performed to investigate the effect of wall temperature on the separation bubble length in laminar hypersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction flows over double-cone configuration at the Mach number of 12.2. The flow field is described in detail in terms of different shocks, expansion fans, shear layer and separation bubble. The variation of the Prandtl number has a negligible effect on the flow field and wall data. A specific heat ratio of less than 1.4 results in the better prediction of wall pressure and heat flux in the shock/boundary-layer interaction region. It is observed that as the wall temperature is increased, the separation bubble size and hence the separation shock length increases. The high firmness of the laminar boundary-layer at a high Mach number shows that the wall temperature in the shock/boundary-layer interaction region has little effect. The peak wall pressure and heat flux decrease with an increase in wall temperature. An estimation is developed between separation bubble length and wall temperature based on the computed results.

scholarly journals Effects of Crack on Heat Flux in Hypersonic Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (674) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
Hiroshi OZAWA ◽  
Katsuhisa HANAI ◽  
Keiichi KITAMURA ◽  
Koichi MORI ◽  
Yoshiaki NAKAMURA
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Layer Interaction ◽  
Shock Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Hypersonic Shock

Detailed Flow Study of Mach Number 1.6 High Transonic Flow With a Shock Wave in a Pressure Ratio 11 Centrifugal Compressor Impeller

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Higashimori ◽  
Kiyoshi Hasagawa ◽  
Kunio Sumida ◽  
Tooru Suita
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Centrifugal Compressor ◽  
Transonic Flow ◽  
Reverse Flow ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Layer Interaction ◽  
Shock Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Boundary Layer Interaction

Requirements for aeronautical gas turbine engines for helicopters include small size, low weight, high output, and low fuel consumption. In order to achieve these requirements, development work has been carried out on high efficiency and high pressure ratio compressors. As a result, we have developed a single stage centrifugal compressor with a pressure ratio of 11 for a 1000 shp class gas turbine. The centrifugal compressor is a high transonic compressor with an inlet Mach number of about 1.6. In high inlet Mach number compressors, the flow distortion due to the shock wave and the shock boundary layer interaction must have a large effect on the flow in the inducer. In order to ensure the reliability of aerodynamic design technology, the actual supersonic flow phenomena with a shock wave must be ascertained using measurement and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). This report presents the measured results of the high transonic flow at the impeller inlet using Laser Doppler Velocimeter (LDV) and verification of CFD, with respect to the high transonic flow velocity distribution, pressure distribution, and shock boundary layer interaction at the inducer. The impeller inlet tangential velocity is about 460 m/s and the relative Mach number reaches about 1.6. Using a LDV, about 500 m/s relative velocity was measured preceding a steep deceleration of velocity. The following steep deceleration of velocity at the middle of blade pitch clarified the cause as being the pressure rise of a shock wave, through comparison with CFD as well as comparison with the pressure distribution measured using a high frequency pressure transducer. Furthermore, a reverse flow is measured in the vicinity of casing surface. It was clarified by comparison with CFD that the reverse flow is caused by the shock-boundary layer interaction. Generally CFD shows good agreement with the measured velocity distribution at the inducer and splitter inlet, except in the vicinity of the casing surface.

Effect of microramps on flare-induced shock – boundary-layer interaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (1271) ◽  
pp. 121-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nilavarasan ◽  
G. N. Joshi ◽  
A. Misra
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Layer Interaction ◽  
Compression Corner ◽  
Shock Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Control Shock ◽  
Bubble Structure ◽  
Flare Model

AbstractThe ability of microramps to control shock - boundary layer interaction at the vicinity of an axisymmetric compression corner was investigated computationally in a Mach 4 flow. A cylinder/flare model with a flare angle of 25° was chosen for this study. Height (h) of the microramp device was 22% of the undisturbed boundary layer thickness (δ) obtained at the compression corner location. A single array of these microramps with an inter-device spacing of 7.5h was placed at three different streamwise locations viz. 5δ, 10δ and 15δ (22.7h, 45.41h and 68.12h in terms of the device height) upstream of the corner and the variations in the flowfield characteristics were observed. These devices modified the separation bubble structure noticeably by producing alternate upwash and downwash regions in the boundary layer. Variations in the separation bubble’s length and height were observed along the spanwise (circumferential) direction due to these devices.

Detailed Flow Study of Mach Number 1.6 High Transonic Flow With a Shock Wave in a Pressure Ratio 11 Centrifugal Compressor Impeller

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Higashimori ◽  
Kiyoshi Hasagawa ◽  
Kunio Sumida ◽  
Tooru Suita
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Centrifugal Compressor ◽  
Transonic Flow ◽  
Reverse Flow ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Layer Interaction ◽  
Shock Boundary Layer Interaction ◽  
Boundary Layer Interaction

Requirements for aeronautical gas turbine engines for helicopters include small size, low weight, high output, and low fuel consumption. In order to achieve these requirements, development work has been carried out on high efficiency and high pressure ratio compressors. As a result, we have developed a single stage centrifugal compressor with a pressure ratio of 11 for a 1000 shp class gas turbine. The centrifugal compressor is a high transonic compressor with an inlet Mach number of about 1.6. In high inlet Mach number compressors, the flow distortion due to the shock wave and the shock boundary layer interaction must have a large effect on the flow in the inducer. In order to ensure the reliability of aerodynamic design technology, the actual supersonic flow phenomena with a shock wave must be ascertained using measurement and CFD. This report presents the measured results of the high transonic flow at the impeller inlet using LDV and verification of CFD, with respect to the high transonic flow velocity distribution, pressure distribution and shock boundary layer interaction at the inducer. The impeller inlet tangential velocity is about 460m/s and the relative Mach number reaches about 1.6. Using an LDV, about 500m/s relative velocity was measured preceding a steep deceleration of velocity. The following steep deceleration of velocity at the middle of blade pitch clarified the cause as being the pressure rise of a shock wave, through comparison with CFD as well as comparison with the pressure distribution measured using a high frequency pressure transducer. Furthermore, a reverse flow is measured in the vicinity of casing surface. It was clarified by comparison with CFD that the reverse flow is caused by the shock-boundary layer interaction. Generally CFD shows good agreement with the measured velocity distribution at the inducer and splitter inlet, except in the vicinity of the casing surface.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document