The use of thoracic stent grafts for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Vascular ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
VP Bastiaenen ◽  
MGJ Snoeijs ◽  
JGAM Blomjous ◽  
J Bosma ◽  
VJ Leijdekkers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Aortic Neck ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Median Diameter ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objectives Stent grafts for endovascular repair of infrarenal aneurysms are commercially available for aortic necks up to 32 mm in diameter. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endovascular repair with large thoracic stent grafts in the infrarenal position to obtain adequate proximal seal in wider necks. Methods All patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using thoracic stent grafts with diameters greater than 36 mm between 2012 and 2016 were included. Follow-up consisted of CT angiography after six weeks and annual duplex thereafter. Results Eleven patients with wide infrarenal aortic necks received endovascular repair with thoracic stent grafts. The median diameter of the aneurysms was 60 mm (range 52–78 mm) and the median aortic neck diameter was 37 mm (range 28–43 mm). Thoracic stent grafts were oversized by a median of 14% (range 2–43%). On completion angiography, one type I and two type II endoleaks were observed but did not require reintervention. One patient experienced graft migration with aneurysm sac expansion and needed conversion to open repair. Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 2–53 months), during which three patients died, including one aneurysm-related death. Conclusions Endovascular repair using thoracic stent grafts for patients with wide aortic necks is feasible. In these patients, the technique may be a reasonable alternative to complex endovascular repair with fenestrated, branched, or chimney grafts. However, more experience and longer follow-up are required to determine its position within the endovascular armamentarium.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms by fenestrated and branched endografts†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Gallitto ◽  
Gianluca Faggioli ◽  
Rodolfo Pini ◽  
Chiara Mascoli ◽  
Stefano Ancetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our objective was to report the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with endografts. METHODS Between January 2010 and April 2018, patients with TAAAs, considered at high surgical risk for open surgery and treated by Cook-Zenith fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair, were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively analysed. The early end points were 30-day/hospital mortality rate, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day cardiopulmonary and nephrological morbidity. Follow-up end points were survival, patency of target visceral vessels and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (male: 77%; mean age: 73 ± 7 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4: 58/42%) were enrolled. Using Crawford’s classification, 43 (49%) were types I–III and 45 (51%) were type IV TAAAs. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65 ± 15 mm. Custom-made and off-the-shelf endografts were used in 60 (68%) and 28 (32%) cases, respectively. Five (6%) patients had a contained ruptured TAAA. The procedure was performed in multiple steps in 42 (48%) cases. There was 1 (1%) intraoperative death. Five (6%) patients suffered spinal cord ischaemia with permanent paraplegia in 3 (3%) cases. Postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 7 (8%) and 12 (14%) patients, respectively. Worsening of renal function (≥30% of baseline level) was detected in 11 (13%) cases, and 2 (2%) patients required haemodialysis. The 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 5% and 8%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 36 ± 22 months. Survival at 12, 24 and 36 months was 89%, 75% and 70%, respectively. The patency of target visceral vessels at 12, 24 and 36 months was 92%, 92% and 92%, respectively. Freedom from reinterventions at 12, 24 and 36 months was 85%, 85% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The endovascular repair of TAAAs with fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair is feasible and effective with acceptable technical/clinical outcomes at early/midterm follow-up.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with Marfan syndrome

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Allan Marc Conway ◽  
Khalil Qato ◽  
Gautam Anand ◽  
Laurie Mondry ◽  
Gary Giangola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marfan Syndrome ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Aortic Surgery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objectives Marfan syndrome patients are at risk for aortic degeneration. Repair is traditionally performed with open surgery as this is deemed more durable. Endovascular aneurysm repair remains controversial. We report on the outcomes of Marfan syndrome patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Methods The Vascular Quality Initiative registry identified 35,889 patients, including 29 with Marfan syndrome, treated with endovascular aneurysm repair from January 2003 to December 2017. Outcomes were analyzed per the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Results Median age was 70.0 years (IQR, 57.0–75.0), and 22 (75.9%) were male. Median aneurysm diameter was 5.3 cm (IQR, 4.9–6.3 cm), with an aortic neck length and diameter of 2.0 cm (IQR, 1.6–2.8 cm) and 2.5 cm (IQR, 2.2–2.8 cm), respectively. Twenty-one (72.4%) patients were asymptomatic, seven (24.1%) symptomatic, and one (3.4%) presented with rupture. Ten (34.5%) patients had prior aortic surgery. Six (20.7%) were unfit for open surgical repair. Length of stay was 2.0 days (IQR, 1.0–3.0 days). Percutaneous femoral access was performed in 15 (51.7%) patients with no complications. A type IA endoleak was present in one (3.4%), type IB in one (3.4%), and type II endoleak in two (6.9%) patients. There were no postoperative pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological complications. In-hospital mortality occurred in one (3.4%) patient who presented with a rupture and had been deemed unfit for open repair. A conversion to open repair was required. The patient expired on post-operative day 0. Early clinical success was achieved in 26 (89.7%) patients. Follow-up was available for 15 (51.7%) patients at a median time of 766 days (IQR, 653–937). There were no reinterventions or mortalities. Change in sac diameter was −0.6 cm (IQR, −1.1 to −0.2 cm), with no type I or III endoleaks. Discussion Endovascular aneurysm repair for patients with Marfan syndrome is feasible, and can be performed safely. Mid-term outcomes suggest this technique is durable. More robust long-term follow-up is needed.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Open Repair in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ben Pearce ◽  
Tze-Woei Tan ◽  
Wayne W. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Study Intervention ◽  
Complications And Mortality

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark EVAR Trial 1, which compared endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with open repair in patients judged to be fit for both open and endovascular repair. Although endovascular AAA (EVAR) repair was associated with lower perioperative complications and mortality than open surgical repair, after 4 years of follow-up the outcomes of the two approaches were similar. Follow-up at 15 years found EVAR had inferior late survival, necessitating lifelong surveillance of EVAR and reintervention if necessary. The chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazar Davidovic ◽  
Momcilo Colic ◽  
Igor Koncar ◽  
Dejan Markovic ◽  
Dusan Kostic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Stent ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Introduction. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been introduced into clinical practice at the beginning of the 90's of the last century. Because of economic, political and social problems during the last 25 years, the introduction of this procedure in Serbia was not possible. Objective. The aim of this study was to present preliminary experiences and results of the Clinic for Vascular Surgery of the Serbian Clinical Centre in Belgrade in endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods. The procedure was performed in 33 patients (3 female and 30 male), aged from 42 to 83 years. Ten patients had a descending thoracic aorta aneurysm (three atherosclerotic, four traumatic - three chronic and one acute as a part of polytrauma, one dissected, two penetrated atherosclerotic ulcers), while 23 patients had the abdominal aortic aneurysm, one ruptured and two isolated iliac artery aneurysms. The indications for EVAR were isthmic aneurismal localisation, aged over 80 years and associated comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary and cerebrovasular diseases, previous thoracotomy or multiple laparotomies associated with abdominal infection, idiopatic thrombocitopaenia). All of these patients had three or more risk factors. The diagnosis was established using duplex ultrasonography, angiography and MSCT. In the case of thoracic aneurysm, a Medtronic-Valiant? endovascular stent graft was implanted, while for the abdominal aortic aneurysm Medtronic-Talent? endovascular stent grafts with delivery systems were used. In three patients, following EVAR a surgical repair of the femoral artery aneurysm was performed, and in another three patients femoro-femoral cross over bypass followed implantation of aortouniiliac stent graft. Results. During procedure and follow-up period (mean 1.6 years), there were: one death, one conversion, one endoleak type 1, six patients with endoleak type 2 that disappeared during the follow-up period, one early graft thrombosis. No other complications, including aneurysm expansion, collapse, deformity and migration of the endovascular stent grafts, were registered. Conclusion. According to all medical and economic aspects, we recommend EVAR to treat acute traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm, as well as in elderly and high-risk patients with abdominal or thoracic aneurysms, when open surgery is related to a significantly higher mortality and morbidity.

scholarly journals EndoAnchors Minimize Endoleaks in Chimney-Graft Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Luis Galiñanes ◽  
Eduardo A. Hernandez-Vila ◽  
Zvonimir Krajcer
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Complex Anatomy ◽  
Aortic Neck ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Chimney Graft

Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are difficult to treat because they often have little or no proximal aortic neck. Patients with this complex anatomy are not usually candidates for an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Chimney-graft EVAR has been introduced, but type Ia endoleak is a typical risk. We have begun using EndoAnchors to determine whether this risk can be reduced. From July 2013 through July 2014, we used the chimney-graft EVAR technique in 5 patients whose juxtarenal AAAs had a short or no proximal aortic neck. During the procedure, we implanted EndoAnchors as needed. Postprocedurally, at 30 days, and through end of follow-up (duration, 11–18 mo), all patients had patent endografts without type Ia endoleak (our primary endpoint), visceral stent-graft thrombosis, or renal complications. One patient who received 4 chimney grafts had a postprocedural type II endoleak, which was treated with embolization. We found it feasible to use EndoAnchors with the chimney-graft technique to prevent type Ia endoleaks in the treatment of juxtarenal AAAs. Further studies are needed to validate this adjunctive technique and to determine its durability.

Type IIIb Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Zenith Stent Graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Masaki Kano ◽  
Keita Maruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
System Type ◽  
Type Iiib ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present 3 cases of type IIIb endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith stent graft system. Type III endoleak, like type I endoleak, is a high-pressure, high-risk leak that increases sac pressure up to or even above arterial pressure, and is associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of aneurysm rupture. Type IIIb endoleak is rare but there is much concern that the incidence of type IIIb endoleak is likely to increase hereafter; the mechanism of type IIIb endoleak is deterioration of graft fabric in conjunction with stent sutures. Type IIIb endoleak is difficult to diagnose before rupture. The possibility of type IIIb endoleak should be highly suspected when the continued growth of an excluded aneurysm sac without direct radiologic evidence is observed during follow-up. Type IIIb endoleak can be repaired by relining of the stent graft with additional stent grafts.

Acute Kidney Injury after Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (44) ◽  
pp. 4686-4694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan L. Liang ◽  
Abhisekh Mohapatra ◽  
Efthymios D. Avgerinos ◽  
Athanasios Katsargyris
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Background: Complex endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm carries higher perioperative morbidity than standard infrarenal endovascular repair. Objective: This study reviews the incidence and associated factors of acute kidney injury in complex aortic endovascular repair of juxtarenal, pararenal, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods: A literature review was performed for all studies on the endovascular repair of juxtarenal, pararenal, and thoracoabdominal aneurysms that evaluated rates of acute kidney injury as an outcome. Outcomes were further analyzed by the level of anatomic complexity and method of repair. Results: 52 studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 5454 individuals undergoing repair from 2004 to 2017. The overall rate of acute kidney injury ranged widely from 0 to 41%, with a rate of hemodialysis from 0 to 19% (temporary) and 0 to 14% (permanent). Increasing anatomic complexity was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury. Mode of endovascular repair, learning curve effect, and preoperative chronic renal insufficiency did not demonstrate any associations with the outcome. Conclusion: Published rates of acute kidney injury in complex aortic aneurysm repair vary widely with few definitively associated factors other than increasing anatomic complexity and operative time. Further study is needed for the identification of predictors related to postoperative acute kidney injury.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Superior Method for Surveillance and Follow-up to Detect and Classify Endoleaks Following EVAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-191
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hasan ◽  
Brian J. Schiro ◽  
James F. Benenati
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Iodinated Contrast ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Excellent Method ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for many patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Because of the delayed complications associated with EVAR, namely the development of endoleaks, yearly surveillance of the endograft and aneurysm sac is required. Surveillance has traditionally been carried out with 3-phase computed tomography angiography of the abdomen and pelvis with the use of intravenous iodinated contrast. This incurs cumulative doses of radiation over the remainder of the patient’s life and exposes these patients to repeated administrations of potentially nephrotoxic contrast agents. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as an excellent method of evaluating and categorizing endoleaks without the use of radiation or nephrotoxic agents. This educational article centers around CEUS and its use in EVAR follow-up.

scholarly journals Aortic Rupture during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Report of Our Experience and Review of the Literature

Aorta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 098-103
Author(s):  
Konstantinos G. Moulakakis ◽  
Andreas M. Lazaris ◽  
John D. Kakisis ◽  
George S. Sfyroeras ◽  
George Theocharopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Balloon Inflation ◽  
Hemodynamic Stability ◽  
Aortic Neck ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Wall Injury ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Abstract Background Aortic neck wall rupture during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is an underreported potentially fatal complication. Only a few cases have been reported. The main cause of this complication is repeated attempts at balloon inflation or overdilation to treat an intraoperative Type 1a endoleak. We report three cases complicated by procedure-related aortic neck wall rupture during EVAR. We also review the literature regarding the causes and outcomes of this complication. Methods Medical records of all patients undergoing EVAR between January 2009 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Overall, 824 EVAR procedures were performed, and rupture of the aortic neck wall was observed in three patients. In all cases, a Type 1a endoleak was observed and, in all cases, repeated ballooning attempts had been performed to resolve the endoleaks. In all cases, conversion to open repair was performed and all patients survived. Conclusion In cases of Type 1a endoleak, a maximum of two ballooning attempts should be performed even if a Type 1a endoleak persists. In case of intraoperative aortic neck wall rupture, control of the hemorrhage should be achieved immediately by advancing the balloon above the site of rupture. Emergency surgical conversion in case of hemodynamic stability is the first choice. According to the literature, emergency surgical conversion, especially in cases of endograft with suprarenal fixation, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates, mainly due to hemorrhage and to the length of the procedure required to repair the aortic neck wall injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document