scholarly journals Esophageal dilation with integrated balloon imaging: initial evaluation in a porcine model

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O’Dea ◽  
Peter D. Siersema

Background: When treating achalasia, balloon dilation is often combined with fluoroscopy to allow the lower esophageal sphincter to be visualized as it is being dilated. We sought to evaluate a new balloon dilation technology, EsoFLIP, which allows the shape of the balloon to be visualized in a nonradiographic manner by using impedance planimetry electrodes located within the dilation balloon. Methods: Two pigs weighing 35 kg were used. The EsoFLIP balloon dilator was introduced under endoscopic visualization. Successive injections of 50, 60, 70 and 85 mL into the dilation balloon permitted dilations at increasing diameters to be achieved. Following each dilation fluid was withdrawn to leave 30 mL in the balloon and an EsoFLIP image was captured to track progressive dilation of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Results: The EsoFLIP catheter was safely deployed in the two pigs and no complications were noted. For pig 1, during dilation, the measured balloon diameter at the waist was 24.1, 28.9, 29.2 and 30.0 mm for balloon dilation volumes of 50, 60, 70 and 85 mL respectively. For pig 2 the corresponding diameter at the waist was 22.8, 27.1, 28.5 and 29.4 mm. The GEJ diameter increased from 12.5 and 12.4 mm to 17.4 and 17.5mm for pigs 1 and 2 respectively. Distensibility of the GEJ in pig 1 increased from 2.3 mm2/mmHg before to 4.4 mm2/mmHg after dilation and in pig 2 from 4.4 to 9.6 mm2/mmHg. The GEJ substantively achieved its final diameter after the dilation using just 50 mL in the balloon. Conclusions: We demonstrated technical feasibility and safety of the EsoFLIP dilator in a porcine model. Further studies in humans with achalasia remain to be conducted, which, besides demonstrating technical feasibility, should also evaluate the use of distensibility measurements taken during dilation to predict outcomes.

1992 ◽  
Vol 263 (4) ◽  
pp. G551-G557 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Martin ◽  
W. J. Dodds ◽  
H. H. Liem ◽  
R. O. Dantas ◽  
R. D. layman ◽  
...  

Events associated with gastroesophageal reflux have been determined by concurrent diaphragmatic and esophageal body electromyography, video radiography, and manometry in four conscious dogs. Three characteristic phenomena occurred in parallel immediately before and during gastroesophageal reflux: 1) transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, 2) profound (99.5%) and selective inhibition of crural diaphragmatic activity, and 3) a previously unrecognized dorsal movement of the gastroesophageal junction (mean 1.3 cm) demonstrated by implanted radiological markers. The patterns associated with spontaneous acid and gas reflux were indistinguishable from those induced by gastric distension. Costolumbar diaphragmatic activity was stable up until the instant of sphincter opening, when there was a single costolumbar contraction of short duration and high amplitude. Esophageal shortening did not occur before reflux. Reflux that occurred after atropine-induced inhibition of lower esophageal sphincter tone to < 2 mmHg was intermittent and coincided with selective crural inhibition. These studies demonstrated that selective crural inhibition is a prerequisite for gastroesophageal reflux and suggest that the crural diaphragm is an important factor for the maintenance of gastroesophageal competence.


2005 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. AB79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey V. Kantsevoy ◽  
Vandana R. Long ◽  
Sanjay B. Jagannath ◽  
Elizabeth Hwang ◽  
Brenda Brehon ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 307 (4) ◽  
pp. G452-G458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan M. Lang ◽  
Bidyut K. Medda ◽  
Reza Shaker

The aim of this study was to determine the mechanism of initiation of transient upper esophageal sphincter relaxation (TUESR) caused by gastric air distension. Cats ( n = 31) were decerebrated, EMG electrodes were placed on the cricopharyngeus, a gastric fistula was formed, and a strain gauge was sewn on the lower esophageal sphincter ( n = 8). Injection of air (114 ± 13 ml) in the stomach caused TUESR ( n = 18) and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR, n = 6), and this effect was not significantly ( P > 0.05) affected by thoracotomy. Free air or bagged air ( n = 6) activated TLESR, but only free air activated TUESR. Closure of the gastroesophageal junction blocked TUESR (9/9), but not TLESR (4/4), caused by air inflation of the stomach. Venting air from distal esophagus during air inflation of the stomach prevented TUESR ( n = 12) but did not prevent air escape from the stomach to the esophagus ( n = 4). Rapid injection of air on the esophageal mucosa always caused TUESR (9/9) but did not always (7/9) cause an increase in esophageal pressure. The time delay between the TUESR and the rapid air pulse was significantly more variable ( P < 0.05) than the time delay between the rapid air pulse and the rise in esophageal pressure. We concluded that the TUESR caused by gastric air distension is dependent on air escape from the stomach, which stimulates receptors in the esophagus, but is not dependent on distension of the stomach or esophagus, or the TLESR. Therefore, the TUESR caused by gastric air distension is initiated by stimulation of receptors in the esophageal mucosa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document