scholarly journals Adherence to Insulin Pump Behaviors in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana R. Patton ◽  
Kimberly A. Driscoll ◽  
Mark A. Clements

Background: Parents of young children are responsible for daily type 1 diabetes (T1DM) cares including insulin bolusing. For optimal insulin pump management, parents should enter a blood glucose result (SMBG) and a carbohydrate estimate (if food will be consumed) into the bolus advisor in their child’s pump to assist in delivering the recommended insulin bolus. Previously, pump adherence behaviors were described in adolescents; we describe these behaviors in a sample of young children. Methods: Pump data covering between 14-30 consecutive days were obtained for 116 children. Assessed adherence to essential pump adherence behaviors (eg, SMBG, carbohydrate entry, and insulin use) and adherence to 3 Wizard/Bolus Advisor steps: SMBG–carbohydrate entry–insulin bolus delivered. Results: Parents completed SMBG ≥4 times on 99% of days, bolused insulin ≥3 times on 95% of days, and entered carbohydrates ≥3 times on 93% of days, but they corrected for hyperglycemia (≥250 mg/dl or 13.9 mmol/l) only 63% of the time. Parents completed Wizard/Bolus Advisor steps (SMBG, carbohydrate entry, insulin bolus) within 30 minutes for 43% of boluses. Inverse correlations were found between children’s mean daily glucose and the percentage of days with ≥4 SMBG and ≥3 carbohydrate entries as well as the percentage of boluses where all Wizard/Bolus Advisor steps were completed. Conclusions: Parents of young children adhered to individual pump behaviors, but showed some variability in their adherence to Wizard/Bolus Advisor steps. Parents showed low adherence to recommendations to correct for hyperglycemia. Like adolescents, targeting pump behaviors in young children may have the potential to optimize glycemic control.




2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordana Bukara-Radujkovic ◽  
Dragan Zdravkovic ◽  
Sinisa Lakic

Background/Aim. Balancing strict glycemic control with setting realistic goals for each individual child and family can optimize growth, ensure normal pubertal development and emotional maturation, and control long term complications in children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of short-term continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) application in improvement of glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Methods. A total of 80 pediatric T1DM patients were randomly assigned into the experimental and the control group. The experimental group wore CGMS sensor for 72 hours at the beginning of the study. Self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) levels and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were obtained for both groups at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months. Results. There was a significant improvement in HbA1c (p < 0.001), in both the experimental and the control group, without a significant difference between the groups. Nevertheless, after 6 months the improvement of mean glycemia was noticed only in the experimental group. This finding was accompanied with a decrease in the number of hyperglycemic events and no increase in the number of hypoglycemic events in the experimental group. Conclusions. The results suggest that the CGMS can be considered as a valuable tool in treating pediatric T1DM patients, however further research is needed to more accurately estimate to what extent, if any, it outperforms intensive self-monitoring of blood glucose.



2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine J. Orr ◽  
Wilma Hopman ◽  
Joy L. Yen ◽  
Robyn L. Houlden


2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 876-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
George S. Jeha ◽  
Lefkothea P. Karaviti ◽  
Barbara Anderson ◽  
E. O'Brian Smith ◽  
Susan Donaldson ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 420-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry N. Laptev ◽  
Valentina A. Peterkova

Rationale: Healthcare access plays a significant role in the improvement and maintaining of glycemic control and quality of life in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of remote support in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and its effect on glycemic control and quality of life. Materials and methods: In 40 children and adolescents (132,7 years, 18/22 m/f) on CSII with inadequately controlled T1DM (HbA1c7,5%) we evaluated the effectiveness of telemedical support (TS), as compared with conventional support (CS). Parameters of glycemic control (HbA1c, average glycemia, SD, etc.) and quality of a life were obtained on follow-up visits. Patients and their parents in ТМ group twice a month sent their insulin pump data using to CSII center and diabetologists sent back their advice via e-mail, phone or Skype. The primary end point was the change from the baseline HbA1c level and the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c of less than 7.5%. Results: At 24 weeks, the baseline mean HbA1c (8.7% in the two study groups) had decreased to 7.7% in the TS group, as compared with 8.4% in the CS group (P0,05). The proportion of patients who reached the HbA1c target (7,5%) was greater in the TS group (50%) than in the CS group (20%, p0,05). A number of quality of life indicators for both parents and children with T1DM at the end of the study compared to baseline significantly increased in the TS group compared with the TC group (p0.05). During the study period rate of severe hypoglycemia and DKA in TS group (0 and 10 cases per 100 person-years) did not differ significantly from that in CS group (0 and 20 cases per 100 person-years, P0,05). Conclusion: In children with inadequately controlled T1DM, telemedical support proved to be feasible and resulted in significant improvement in glucose control (HbA1c, glucose variability) and quality of life without the increase in the incidence of DKA and severe glycemia.



2008 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh M. Nguyen ◽  
Kimberly J. Mason ◽  
Cynthia G. Sanders ◽  
Parvin Yazdani ◽  
Rubina A. Heptulla


2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 258-260
Author(s):  
Stefan Razeghi ◽  
Verena Schubert ◽  
Ina Knerr ◽  
Christian Plank ◽  
Theodor Zimmermann


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Jefferson do Nascimento Andrade ◽  
Crésio de Aragão Dantas Alves


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document