scholarly journals Pan-European Economic Analysis to Identify Cost Savings for the Health Care Systems as a Result of Integrating Glucose Monitoring Based Telemedical Approaches Into Diabetes Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1112-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Fritzen ◽  
Kornelia Basinska ◽  
Matilde Rubio-Almanza ◽  
Antonio Nicolucci ◽  
Brian Kennon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
European Health

Background: Self-monitoring of blood glucose supported by the diabetes-app OneTouch Reveal® has demonstrated to improve HbA1c. We aimed at analyzing costs savings related the integration of telemedical features into diabetes management. Methods: Data from a randomized controlled trial were used to assess the 10-year risk of patients for fatal myocardial infarction (MI). On the basis of this risk assessments—also related to a 5% or 10% reduction of hypoglycemic episodes—cost savings for the health care systems of five European countries—France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom—were modeled. Results: HbA1c reduction of 0.92% in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients (T2DM) was associated with a 2.3% decreased 10-year risk for fatal MI. In combination with a 10% reduction of hypoglycemic events this risk reduction led to cost savings of €16.1 million (France), €57.8 million (Germany), €30.9 million (Italy), €23.8 million (Spain), and €5.8 million (UK), considering all insulin-treated T2DM patients in the respective countries. Conclusion: Improving metabolic control and thus risk for comorbidities like MI by combining the glucose meter with CRI with telemedical features has the potential to reduce costs for European health care systems.

Doctor–patient communication in different European health care systems:

2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. van den Brink-Muinen ◽  
P.F.M. Verhaak ◽  
J.M. Bensing ◽  
O. Bahrs ◽  
M. Deveugele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Patient Communication ◽  
Doctor Patient Communication ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
European Health

scholarly journals Enhancing the rational use of new medicines across European health care systems

2008 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Garattini ◽  
Vittorio Bertele’ ◽  
Brian Godman ◽  
Alan Haycox ◽  
Björn Wettermark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Rational Use ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
European Health

The sustainability of European health care systems: beyond income and aging

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pammolli ◽  
Massimo Riccaboni ◽  
Laura Magazzini
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
European Health

Patient Choice and Patient Empowerment in Northern European Health Systems: A Conceptual Framework

1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Saltman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
European Health ◽  
The Impact

The issue of patient choice presents a complicated challenge to publicly operated health systems. Increased patient choice can strengthen the citizen's commitment to traditional welfare state objectives, or alternatively, it can severely damage that commitment, depending upon the design of the choice mechanism and the structural context within which patient choice occurs. For patient choice to be linked to true empowerment, choice must reinforce rather than undercut the accountability of health care providers to the population they serve. This article explores the basic issues involved in empowering patients within publicly operated health systems. The author first reviews the conceptual components that could or should be incorporated within the notion of empowered patients, then examines what would be required to actually empower patients within health systems, defined in terms of expanding not only logistical choice but also clinical influence and decision-making participation. The article concludes with a wide-ranging analysis of the impact of potential policies and mechanisms on the long-term objectives of achieving democratically accountable health care systems.

Utilization of Health Care Coalitions and Resiliency Forums in the United States and United Kingdom: Different Approaches to Strengthen Emergency Preparedness

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Walsh ◽  
Allan Graeme Swan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Emergency Management ◽  
Emergency Preparedness ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Care Systems

ABSTRACTThe process for developing national emergency management strategies for both the United States and the United Kingdom has led to the formulation of differing approaches to meet similar desired outcomes. Historically, the pathways for each are the result of the enactment of legislation in response to a significant event or a series of events. The resulting laws attempt to revise practices and policies leading to more effective and efficient management in preparing, responding, and mitigating all types of natural, manmade, and technological hazards. Following the turn of the 21st century, each country has experienced significant advancements in emergency management including the formation and utilization of 2 distinct models: health care coalitions in the United States and resiliency forums in the United Kingdom. Both models have evolved from circumstances and governance unique to each country. Further in-depth study of both approaches will identify strengths, weaknesses, and existing gaps to meet continued and future challenges of our respective disaster health care systems. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:161–164)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document