A Systematic Review on the Reporting of Outcome Data in Studies on Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Hannon ◽  
Nikolas Baksh ◽  
Hunter Newman ◽  
Christopher D. Murawski ◽  
Niall A. Smyth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation

scholarly journals Return to Play and Rehabilitation Protocols following Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0039
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Dexter Seow ◽  
Arianna L Gianakos ◽  
Eugenio Chiarello ◽  
John G. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocols

Category: Ankle, Sports Introduction/Purpose: Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) has demonstrated favourable outcomes in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). Recent studies have reported high rates of return to play sports following AOT for OLT, however variable rates of return to play have been reported ranging from 50 to 95%. In addition, little information regarding optimal standardized rehabilitation protocols and return to play guidelines has been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of return to play following AOT for OLT by systematic review and meta-analysis and report subsequent rehabilitation protocols. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases was evaluated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Predetermined data was extracted on a datasheet with the return to play calculated as a percentage of patients that returned to sport. Rehabilitation protocols were recorded as the earliest time that range of motion, partial weightbearing and full weightbearing commenced was recorded. The quality of return to play guidelines in each study was evaluated based on the criteria by Zaman et al. Well defined return to play criteria was allocated a score of 4, poorly defined criteria allocated a score between 1 to 3 and no return to play criteria allocated 0. The meta-analysis of return to play was performed using previously published criteria. Results: The search strategy yielded 8 studies evaluating 200 ankles with a mean follow-up of 44.3 ± 26.8 months (range, 16 to 84 months), mean age of 31.3 ± 6.92 years (range, 22.7 to 42 years) and mean OLT size of 119.2 ± 35.3 mm2 (range, 68.9 to 180 mm2). The mean time to return to play was 4.55 ± 2.19 months (range, 3 to 6.1 months). The reported rates of return to play ranged from 50% to 95.2%. The accumulative rate of return to play was 83.8% (140/167), with 77.4% (48/62) of athletes returning to pre-injury status. Based on the fixed-effect model, the rate of return to play was 81.5% (Figure 1). The quality of return to play criteria was poor in all. Conclusion: This systematic review indicates high rate of return to play following AOT in the athletic population. Rehabilitation protocols were largely inconsistent and were primarily based on individual surgeon protocols. The included studies were of low level and quality of evidence, therefore, further well-designed studies are warranted to sufficiently improve the reporting accuracy for rate of return to play.

Effect of the Containment Type on Clinical Outcomes in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Treated With Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 2096-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Johanna C.E. Donders ◽  
Youichi Yasui ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Timothy W. Deyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Type Group

Background: Uncontained-type osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) have been shown to have inferior clinical outcomes after treatment with bone marrow stimulation. While autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) is indicated for larger lesions, no study has reported on the prognostic significance of the containment of OLTs treated with the AOT procedure. Purpose: To clarify the effect of the containment of OLTs on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who underwent AOT for OLTs. Study Design: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with contained-type and uncontained-type OLTs was undertaken to include all patients who underwent AOT for the treatment of OLTs between 2006 and 2014. Analyses were performed by grouping the patients according to the containment type. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) preoperatively and at final follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 2 years’ follow-up was evaluated with the modified magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting postoperative FAOS, SF-12, and MOCART scores. Results: Ninety-four patients were included: 31 patients with a contained-type OLT and 63 patients with an uncontained-type OLT. The median patient age was 34 years (interquartile range [IQR], 28-48 years) in the contained-type group and 36 years (IQR, 27-46 years) in the uncontained-type group. The median follow-up time was 45 months (IQR, 38-63 months) in the contained-type group and 52 months (IQR, 40-66 months) in the uncontained-type group. The median FAOS and SF-12 scores improved significantly after surgery in both contained-type and uncontained-type lesions ( P < .001). The median postoperative FAOS score of patients with contained-type OLTs was higher than that of patients with uncontained-type OLTs (91.7 vs 85.0, respectively; P = .009), but no significant differences were found between the contained-type and uncontained-type groups for postoperative SF-12 and MOCART scores. The multivariate regression models showed that patients with contained-type OLTs had an approximately 10-point better score on the FAOS compared with patients with uncontained-type OLTs ( P = .006). There was a nonsignificant trend for the rate of cystic occurrence in uncontained-type OLTs to be higher than that of contained-type OLTs (55.6% vs 38.7%, respectively; P = .125). Conclusion: Patients with contained-type OLTs experienced better clinical outcomes than those with uncontained-type OLTs after AOT for the treatment of OLTs. However, the AOT procedure still provided good clinical and MRI outcomes in both contained-type and uncontained-type OLTs at midterm follow-up.

scholarly journals Mid-term Outcomes of Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0044
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Eoghan Hurley ◽  
John Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Current Systematic Review

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) is an established treatment for large-sized OLT, typically greater than 107mm2. Several studies have demonstrated favourable outcomes following AOT at short- and mid-term follow-up. However, the majority of the literature on AOT has short-term follow-up and little evidence exists on the mid-term and longer-term follow-up. Additionally, few studies include a large number of patients or have a high level of evidence, limiting the ability to draw broad and meaningful conclusions about the effectiveness of the AOT procedure for the treatment of OLT beyond short-term follow-up. The purpose of the current systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes analysing level and quality of evidence of the AOT procedure in the treatment of OLT at mid-term and long-term follow-up. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in October 2017 based on the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies were evaluated with regard to level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) using the Coleman Methodology Score. Clinical outcomes, and complications were also evaluated. Results: Eleven studies, with 500 ankles were included at a mean 62.8 months follow-up. There were 3 studies of LOE III, and 8 studies of LOE IV. There were 3 studies of fair quality and 8 studies of poor quality. The weighted mean preoperative AOFAS score was 55.1 ± 6.1, and the postoperative score was 86.2 ± 4.5, with 87.4% of patients being reported as excellent or good results. In total, 54 of the 500 patients (10.8%) had complications. The most common complication was donor site morbidity with 18 patients (3.6%) at final follow-up. Thirty-one patients (6.2%) underwent reoperations, and the authors deemed a total of 5 ankles (1.0%) failures. Only 5 studies (45.5%) used MRI for follow-up evaluation. Conclusion: The current systematic review demonstrated that good clinical and functional outcomes can be expected following AOT procedure for the treatment of OLT, with a failure rate of only 1.0% at 63 months follow-up. MRI and radiographs showed restoration of articular surface as well as a minimal presence of osteoarthritis at mid-term follow-up. However, there is still lack of data from high LOE and QOE studies, and further high quality studies are necessary.

scholarly journals Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Does Gender Impact Outcomes?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0022
Author(s):  
Arianna L. Gianakos ◽  
Olasunmbo Okedele ◽  
Sean Flynn ◽  
John G. Kennedy ◽  
Christopher W. DiGiovanni
Keyword(s):  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
The Mean

Category: Ankle; Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) is commonly used in the treatment of osteochondral lesions (OCL) of the talus. There is limited data comparing gender differences in the incidence, presentation, and outcomes following AOT. The purpose of this study is to compare these differences between male and female patients. Methods: Eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent AOT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on gender. Demographic data and OCL defect characteristic data were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed pre- and post-operatively using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). The Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score was used to assess cartilage incorporation. The mean clinical follow-up was 47.2 months, with mean MRI follow-up of 24.8 months. Results: Fifty-five (65%) males and 30 (35%) females were included. OCL defect size was significantly larger in men (112.8mm2) when compared with women (88.7mm2) (p<0.0001). Male patients had a significantly longer duration of symptoms (p<0.001) and OCLs were more likely traumatic in nature (p=0.0006) when compared with female patients. Mean FAOS improved pre- to postoperatively from 50 to 81(P < .001) with a statistically significant increase in men (p<0.0001). The mean MOCART score was 82.1 and 86.7 in male and female patients, respectively (p<0.0001). Lesion size was negatively correlated with MOCART score (r = -0.36,P = .004). No differences were found in knee donor site morbidity, complication rate, or revision surgery. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that male patients typically present with talar OCLs that are larger in size, traumatic in nature, and with longer symptom duration when compared with female patients. In addition, male patients had greater improvement in FAOS scores following AOT. Therefore, understanding these differences may influence the management and treatment of talar OCLs in male and female patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document