Interphalangeal Arthrodesis of the Toe With a New Radiolucent Intramedullary Implant (Toegrip)

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 520-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Averous ◽  
Frederic Leider ◽  
Hubert Rocher ◽  
Patrice Determe ◽  
Stephane Guillo ◽  
...  
Injury ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Kuis ◽  
V.A. de Ridder

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S52-S58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Calder ◽  
Maritz Laubscher ◽  
W. David Goodier

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Neukom ◽  
Miriam Marks ◽  
Stefanie Hensler ◽  
Sylvia Kündig ◽  
Daniel B. Herren ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction after distal interphalangeal joint silicone arthroplasty and compare this outcome to that achieved with screw arthrodesis. On average 4.4 years after surgery, range of motion of the distal interphalangeal joint, pain on a numeric rating scale, satisfaction, and hand appearance of 48 patients (78 treated fingers) were assessed. For arthroplasty patients, mean distal interphalangeal joint motion was 28° with an extension deficit of 17°. Pain was low for arthroplasty and arthrodesis patients with scores of 0.2 and 0.6 out of a total of 10 points, respectively. The patients in both groups were satisfied with their outcomes, but arthroplasty patients were less satisfied with the appearance. Twenty-one per cent of the arthroplasties and 15% of the arthrodeses underwent reoperation. We suggest the motion-preserving distal interphalangeal arthroplasty as an alternative to distal interphalangeal arthrodesis for patients with higher functional demands and whose joints are stable preoperatively. In patients attaching importance to hand aesthetics and for unstable joints, distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is preferable. Level of evidence: III


Author(s):  
Michel Assad ◽  
Anne Marie Downey ◽  
Caroline Cluzel ◽  
Yannick Trudel ◽  
Nancy Doyle ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 817-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Canales ◽  
Mark C. Razzante ◽  
Duane J. Ehredt ◽  
Coleman O. Clougherty

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1020-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jascha Armin Wendelstein ◽  
Peter Goger ◽  
Peter Bock ◽  
Reinhard Schuh ◽  
Priv Doz ◽  
...  

Background: Although standard fixation of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthrodesis by K-wire is relatively inexpensive and well established, it does have some drawbacks, making newer fixation devices interesting. The aim of this study was to clinically and radiologically assess the operative correction of the lesser toe deformation in the form of a PIP arthrodesis using a bioabsorbable 2.7-mm fixation screw. Methods: From January 2011 until October 2013, 34 patients underwent a PIP arthrodesis using the TRIM-IT (Arthrex) 2.7-mm fixation screw and were contacted for this retrospective cohort study. At an average of 3.3 years after the operation, 24 patients and 26 toes were evaluated clinically, radiologically, through pedobarography, and a patient-satisfaction survey. Results: Using the PLLA screw for fixation, 84.6% showed bony union of the arthrodesis, and 84.6% were satisfied. Mean AOFAS score was 82.7 points and thus regarded as good. The mean VAS score was 1.3/10. Overall, 73.1% of the toes showed good alignment, and 7.7% had a painless recurrence of deformity and were still satisfied with the intervention. In addition, 34.6% had floating toes, but only 4.2% without Weil osteotomy or encroachment. Further, 3.8% were advised to undergo a revision because of severe misalignment. Conclusion: The 2.7-mm bioabsorbable fixation screw yielded results that were comparable to other fixation devices for PIP fusion fixation regarding success rate, revisions, and patient acceptance. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document