scholarly journals Implications of coronary artery calcium testing on risk stratification for lipid-lowering therapy according to the 2016 European Society of Cardiology recommendations: The MESA study

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (17) ◽  
pp. 1887-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio S Bittencourt ◽  
Ron Blankstein ◽  
Michael J Blaha ◽  
Veit Sandfort ◽  
Arthur S Agatston ◽  
...  

Aims The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline on cardiovascular risk assessment considers coronary artery calcium a class B indication for risk assessment. We evaluated the degree to which coronary artery calcium can change the recommendation for individuals based on a change in estimated risk. Methods and results We stratified 5602 MESA participants according to the ESC recommendation as: no lipid-lowering treatment recommended ( N = 2228), consider lipid-lowering treatment if uncontrolled ( N = 1686), or lipid-lowering treatment recommended ( N = 1688). We evaluated the ability of coronary artery calcium to reclassify cardiovascular risk. Among the selected sample, 54% had coronary artery calcium of zero, 25% had coronary artery calcium of 1–100 and 21% had coronary artery calcium greater than 100. In the lipid-lowering treatment recommended group 31% had coronary artery calcium of zero, while in the lipid-lowering treatment if uncontrolled group about 50% had coronary artery calcium of zero. The cardiovascular mortality rate was 1.7%/10 years in the lipid-lowering treatment if uncontrolled, and 7.0%/10 years in the lipid-lowering treatment recommended group. The absence of coronary artery calcium was associated with 1.4%/10 years in the lipid-lowering treatment if uncontrolled group and 3.0%/10 years in the lipid-lowering treatment recommended group. Compared with coronary artery calcium of zero, any coronary artery calcium was associated with significantly higher cardiovascular mortality in the lipid-lowering treatment recommended group (9.0%/10 years), whereas only coronary artery calcium greater than 100 was significantly associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality in the lipid-lowering treatment if uncontrolled group (3.2%/10 years). Conclusion The absence of coronary artery calcium is associated with a low incidence of cardiovascular mortality or coronary heart disease events even in individuals in whom lipid-lowering therapy is recommended. A significant proportion of individuals deemed to be candidates for lipid-lowering therapy might be reclassified to a lower risk group with the use of coronary artery calcium.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1797-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio H. Miname ◽  
Marcio Sommer Bittencourt ◽  
Sérgio R. Moraes ◽  
Rômulo I.M. Alves ◽  
Pamela R.S. Silva ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4687-4687
Author(s):  
Kamila Izabela Cisak ◽  
Jianmin Pan ◽  
Shesh Nath Rai ◽  
Patricia Ashby ◽  
Vivek R. Sharma

Abstract Introduction Hemophilia A and B are genetic disorders characterized by deficiency of clotting factors resulting in delayed bleeding. Despite hypocoagulable state, patients with hemophilia are prone to developing coronary artery disease or its equivalents. It is known that proper treatment of dyslipidemia has relevant impact of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events reduction. The goal of our study was to determine implementation of newest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol in our patients with hemophilia and assess how many more patients currently may require lipid-lowering therapy. Methods We performed retrospective chart review of patients followed at single hemophilia treatment center in United States. We included 30 patients with factor VIII or IX deficiency, age 30 and older, followed in clinic between 2005 and 2014 with available lipid profile results. Patients with acquired hemophilia were excluded from study. We used stepwise approach proposed by above guidelines and divided patients into four groups. Results 4 patients among 30 were already on lipid lowering therapy. 1 (3.3%) additional patient [95% CI 0.001-0.17] required lipid lowering therapy due to presence of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (group 1), 0 patients had LDL-C at least 190 mg/dl (group 2), 2 (6.7%) additional patients [95% CI 0.008-0.21] required therapy due to presence of diabetes mellitus and 40 to 75 year of age and LDL-C levels of 70 to 189 mg/dl (group 3); 9 (30%) additional patients [95% CI 0.17-0.51] should receive therapy due to age 40 to 75 and estimated 10-year ASCVD risk above 7.5%. We had total 12 (40%) additional patients among 30 with known lipid profile who were not on lipid lowering therapy but who require such therapy based on the latest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol. Conclusion Aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modifications play a significant role in prevention of coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease. This may be even more relevant in patients with hemophilia who have an increased baseline risk of bleeding and may therefore be at greater risk of complications from anti-thrombotic therapies used for treating cardiovascular disease. Above results suggest that according to actual 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol, a significant number of patients with hemophilia may require lipid lowering therapy. It is important for hemophilia treatment centers to screen their patients with regard to this since many of them may either not have primary care physicians or may not be perceived as having high risk for cardiovascular disease due to their bleeding disorder. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio H Miname ◽  
Marcio Sommers Bittencourt ◽  
Alexandre C Pereira ◽  
Cinthia E Jannes ◽  
Jose E Krieger ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The objective of this study was to evaluate if vascular age derived from coronary artery calcium (CAC) score improves atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk discrimination in primary prevention asymptomatic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients undergoing standard lipid-lowering therapy. Methods and results Two hundred and six molecularly confirmed FH individuals (age 45 ± 14 years, 36% males, baseline LDL-cholesterol 6.2 ± 2.2 mmol/L; 239 ± 85mg/dL) were followed by 4.4 ± 2.9 years (median: 3.7 years, interquartile ranges 2.7–6.8). CAC measurement was performed, and lipid-lowering therapy was optimized according to FH guidelines. Vascular age was derived from CAC and calculated according to the Multi Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis algorithm. Risk estimation based on the Framingham equations was calculated for both biological (bFRS) and vascular (vaFRS) age. During follow-up, 15 ASCVD events (7.2%) were documented. The annualized rate of events for bFRS <10%, 10–20%, and >20% was respectively: 8.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.17–22.52], 23.28 (95% CI 9.69–55.94), and 28.13 (95% CI 12.63–62.61) per 1000 patients. The annualized rate of events for vaFRS <10%, 10–20%, and >20% was respectively: 0, 0, and 50.37 (95% CI 30.37–83.56) per 1000 patients. vaFRS presented a better discrimination for ASCVD events compared to bFRS 0.7058 (95% CI 0.5866–0.8250) vs. vaFRS 0.8820 (95% CI 0.8286–0.9355), P = 0.0005. Conclusion CAC derived vascular age can improve ASCVD risk discrimination in primary prevention FH subjects. This tool may help further stratify risk in FH patients already receiving lipid-lowering medication who might be candidates for further treatment with newer therapies.


2020 ◽  
pp. 204748732091411
Author(s):  
Daniel E Harris ◽  
Arron Lacey ◽  
Ashley Akbari ◽  
Fatemeh Torabi ◽  
Dave Smith ◽  
...  

Aims European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society 2019 guidelines recommend more aggressive lipid targets in high- and very high-risk patients and the addition of adjuvant treatments to statins in uncontrolled patients. We aimed to assess (a) achievement of prior and new European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society lipid targets and (b) lipid-lowering therapy prescribing in a nationwide cohort of very high-risk patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational population study using linked health data in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (2012–2017). Follow-up was for one-year post-discharge. Results Altogether, 10,071 patients had a documented LDL-C level, of whom 48% had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)<1.8 mmol/l (2016 target) and (23%) <1.4 mmol/l (2019 target). Five thousand three hundred and forty patients had non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) documented with 57% <2.6 mmol/l (2016) and 37% <2.2 mmol/l (2019). In patients with recurrent vascular events, fewer than 6% of the patients achieved the 2019 LDL-C target of <1.0 mmol/l. A total of 10,592 patients had triglyceride (TG) levels documented, of whom 14% were ≥2.3 mmol/l and 41% ≥1.5 mmol/l (2019). High-intensity statins were prescribed in 56.4% of the cohort, only 3% were prescribed ezetimibe, fibrates or prescription-grade N-3 fatty acids. Prescribing of these agents was lower amongst patients above target LDL-C, non-HDL-C and triglyceride levels. Females were more likely to have LDL-C, non-HDL-C and triglyceride levels above target. Conclusion There was a low rate of achievement of the new European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society lipid targets in this large post-percutaneous coronary intervention population and relatively low rates of intensive lipid-lowering therapy prescribing in those with uncontrolled lipids. There is considerable potential to optimise lipid-lowering therapy further through statin intensification and appropriate use of novel lipid-lowering therapy, especially in women.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Flueckiger ◽  
Waqas Qureshi ◽  
Michael Blaha ◽  
Gregory Burke ◽  
Veit Sandfort ◽  
...  

Introduction:Statin therapy for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events provides greater relative risk reduction compared with primary prevention. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) identifies individuals with established but subclinical ASCVD disease. Identifying a population with a higher prevalence of CAC may improve the benefit and efficacy of statin therapy in the primary prevention of ASCVD. We assessed the accuracy of class I statin eligibility criterion for primary prevention by the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines for the presence of CAC and compared it with class I criterion for lipid lowering therapy eligibility by the 2004 NCEP/ATP III and 2011 ESC/EAS cholesterol guidelines. Methods:4723 out of the 6814 total participants not taken statins during the baseline exam and with complete data including CAC were included in analysis. We evaluated the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of class I recommendation for lipid lowering therapy (high risk designation) by the three cholesterol guidelines for three categories of prevalent CAC [CAC present/absent; CAC ≥ 100; CAC ≥300 Agatston] in participants of the Multi Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Results:Mean age 59±9 years, 47% male, 37% white, 28% black, 23% Hispanic, 12% Asian, 7.5% with diabetes, 35% current/former smokers, mean glomerular filtration rate of 83±18 ml/min and mean BMI of 28±6 kg/m2. 1978(41.9%), 816(17.3%) and 392(8.3%) had CAC present, CAC ≥100 and CAC ≥300 respectively. Table 1 shows the results. Conclusions:The SN, SP, PPV and NPV of class I statin eligibility criteria by the 3 guidelines for subclinical ASCVD depends significantly on the definition of CAC. The 2013 ACC/AHA class I statin eligibility has a higher SN, lower SP, and higher NPV when compared with the 2004 NCEP/ATP III and 2011 ESC/EAS class I criterion for statin therapy across all three CAC categories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document