scholarly journals Can images of pain enhance patient–clinician rapport in pain consultations?

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire E Ashton-James ◽  
Peter H Dekker ◽  
Judy Addai-Davis ◽  
Tom Chadwick ◽  
Joanna M Zakrzewska ◽  
...  

A variety of treatment outcomes in chronic pain are influenced by patient–clinician rapport. Patients often report finding it difficult to explain their pain, and this potential obstacle to mutual understanding may impede patient–clinician rapport. Previous research has argued that the communication of both patients and clinicians is facilitated by the use of pain-related images in pain assessments. This study investigated whether introducing pain-related images into pain assessments would strengthen various components of patient–clinician rapport, including relative levels of affiliation and dominance, and interpersonal coordination between patient and clinician behaviour. Videos of 35 pain assessments in which pain images were present or absent were used to code behavioural displays of patient and clinician rapport at fixed intervals across the course of the assessment. Mixed modelling was used to examine patterns of patient and clinician affiliation and dominance with consultation type (Image vs Control) as a moderator. When pain images were present, clinicians showed more affiliation behaviour over the course of the consultation and there was greater correspondence between the affiliation behaviour of patient and clinician. However, relative levels of patient and clinician dominance were unaffected by the presence of pain images in consultations. Additional analyses revealed that clinicians responded directly to patients’ use of pain images with displays of affiliation. Based on the results of this study, we recommend further investigation into the utility and feasibility of incorporating pain images into pain assessments to enhance patient–clinician communication.

Author(s):  
R. Ross MacLean ◽  
Suzanne Spinola ◽  
Gabriella Garcia-Vassallo ◽  
Mehmet Sofuoglu

2019 ◽  
pp. 204946371989580
Author(s):  
Dianne Wilson ◽  
Shylie Mackintosh ◽  
Michael K Nicholas ◽  
G Lorimer Moseley ◽  
Daniel S J Costa ◽  
...  

This study explored whether the psychological composition of a group, with respect to mood, catastrophising, fear of movement and pain self-efficacy characteristics at baseline, is associated with individuals’ treatment outcomes following group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based programmes for chronic pain. Retrospective analyses of outcomes from two independently run CBT-based pain management programmes (Programme A: N = 317 and Programme B: N = 693) were conducted. Mixed modelling analyses did not consistently support the presence of associations between group median scores of depression, catastrophising or fear avoidance with outcomes for individuals in either programme. These results suggest that the psychological profiles of groups are not robust predictors of individual outcomes in CBT groups for chronic pain. By implication, efforts made to consider group composition with respect to psychological attributes may be unnecessary.


Author(s):  
Daniel M. Doleys ◽  
Nicholas D. Doleys

Repeated requests for a definitive diagnosis, prognosis, and reassurance as to the positive outcome of a therapy made by some patients with chronic pain can be very exhausting to both patient and clinician—especially when it is clear that no amount of information will be satisfactory. The practitioner can easily feel like be asked to be a psychic or fortune teller. Pain catastrophizing (PC) has emerged as critical area of study. PC has been linked pain intensity, decreased function, and treatment outcomes, including the effect of pain medications such as opioids. It is most effectively addressed by the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy procedures. Learning how to apply these strategies in the context of the typical office visit can reduce the frustration level of the clinician and patient. In more severe cases, referral to behavioral specialist may to advisable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flo Wagner ◽  
Bonnie Janzen ◽  
Gregg Tkachuk ◽  
William Laverty ◽  
Marc Woods

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. S32
Author(s):  
C. Cutter ◽  
F. Buono ◽  
S. Ackerman ◽  
M. Brennan ◽  
D. Mueller ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (4) ◽  
pp. 783-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Wilson ◽  
Shylie Mackintosh ◽  
Michael K. Nicholas ◽  
G. Lorimer Moseley ◽  
Daniel Costa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document