scholarly journals Do Clinical Results and Return-to-Sport Rates After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Differ Based on Graft Choice and Surgical Technique?

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711667014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Rachel M. Frank ◽  
Bernard R. Bach ◽  
Mark S. Cohen ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Peter N. Chalmers ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad ◽  
...  

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a successful procedure among professional baseball pitchers. It is unclear if hamstring tendon harvest side for UCLR affects the outcome or alters the risk for subsequent hamstring injury. Hypothesis: Players with prior UCLR with ipsilateral (drive leg) hamstring autograft will have the same return-to-sport (RTS) rate and performance upon RTS but a higher number of subsequent lower extremity injuries than those with contralateral (landing leg) hamstring autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All players between 2010 and 2015 who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft were included. Surgical details of their procedures were recorded from operative reports. Outcomes for UCLR with hamstring autograft harvested from the drive leg were compared with UCLR with the graft harvested from the landing leg. Results: Overall, 191 players underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft (drive leg, n = 58, 30%; landing leg, n = 133, 70%). The docking technique was more common in the drive leg group, while the figure-of-8 technique was more common in the landing leg group ( P > .001). More patients in the landing leg group underwent concomitant treatment of the ulnar nerve than the drive leg group ( P < .001). No difference existed in RTS rates or timing of RTS between groups. No differences in subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral hamstring injuries occurred between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft from the drive leg or the landing leg ( P≥ .999 and P = .460, respectively). No difference in overall upper or lower extremity injury rates existed between groups (all P > .05), and no difference in performance metrics existed between groups upon RTS. Conclusion: No difference in RTS rate, performance upon RTS, or subsequent injury rates (hamstring, lower extremity, or upper extremity) existed between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft whether the graft came from the drive or the landing leg.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711880878
Author(s):  
Robert A. Keller ◽  
Nathan E. Marshall ◽  
Orr Limpisvasti ◽  
Anthony F. DeGiacomo ◽  
Michael Banffy ◽  
...  

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is common in the sport of baseball, particularly among pitchers. Postoperative return-to-sport protocols have many players beginning to throw at 4 to 5 months and returning to full competition between 12 and 16 months after surgery. Medial elbow pain during the return-to-throwing period often occurs and can be difficult to manage. Purpose: To evaluate the incidence of medial elbow pain and associations with outcomes and revision surgery during the return-to-throwing period after UCLR. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between the years of 2002 and 2014, all pitchers who underwent UCLR at a single institution were identified. Charts were reviewed for incidence of medial elbow pain during return to throwing, return to sport, and subsequent operative interventions, including revision ulnar collateral ligament surgery. Results: Of a total of 616 pitchers who underwent UCLR during the study period, 317 were included in this study. Medial elbow pain was experienced by 45.1% (143 of 317), with a mean time of complaint of 9.75 months after surgery. The groups with and without pain did not differ statistically with regard to age (pain, 20.6 years; no pain, 20.9 years) or level of competition. Of those who experienced medial elbow pain, 10.5% did not return to sport; 5.6% underwent revision UCLR; and 19.6% underwent other operative procedures at the elbow. Among those who did not experience medial elbow pain when returning to throw, 8.7% did not return to sport, with only 1.7% undergoing revision UCLR and 6.9% undergoing other operative elbow procedures. Conclusion: Of the pitchers evaluated in the study, approximately half reported pain during the return-to-throwing phase after UCLR. Those who experienced medial elbow pain had a higher rate of subsequent surgical intervention.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-450
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Howard ◽  
Michael B. Banffy ◽  
Neal S. ElAttrache

Background: Hamstring tendons are commonly harvested as autograft for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. There is no consensus in the literature whether the hamstring tendon should be harvested from the ipsilateral (drive) leg or contralateral (landing) leg of baseball pitchers undergoing ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. Hamstring injuries commonly occur in baseball players, but there are no reports on their incidence specifically among Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers, nor are there reports on whether they occur more commonly in the drive leg or the landing leg. Hypothesis: Hamstring injuries occur more commonly in the landing legs of MLB pitchers. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: MLB pitchers who sustained hamstring injuries requiring time spent on the disabled list were identified from publicly available sources over 10 seasons. Demographics of the pitchers and injury and return-to-sport data were collected. Hamstring injuries to the drive leg were compared with injuries to the landing leg. Results: Sixty-five pitchers had 78 disabled list stints due to hamstring injuries over 10 seasons. The landing leg was injured in 67.9% of cases, and the most common mechanism of injury was pitching. There were no significant differences in demographics between pitchers who sustained drive leg and landing leg injuries. There was no significant difference in mechanism of injury or time to return to sport between pitchers who sustained drive leg and landing leg injuries. Conclusion: The landing leg is more commonly injured than the drive leg among MLB pitchers who sustain hamstring injuries. There is no difference in time to return to sport between pitchers who sustain drive leg and landing leg injuries. More research is required to determine whether there is a difference in performance or future injury between hamstring tendons harvested from the drive leg and the landing leg for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction among pitchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document