scholarly journals A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0000
Author(s):  
Jean-Romain Delaloye ◽  
christoph Hartog ◽  
Samuel Blatter ◽  
Dominik Müller ◽  
Michel Schläppi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament ◽  
The Other ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Deficient Knee ◽  
Lemaire Procedure ◽  
Intact Knee

Objectives: To determine the stabilizing role of the anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and the modified Lemaire lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine if one of these two procedures was superior to the other. Methods: Six non paired cadaveric knees were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system (KUKA Robotics). Internal rotation and anterior tibial translation were measured between 0 and 90° knee flexion after applying 5 N-m Torque and a 134-N anterior load, respectively. A full kinematics assessment was performed in each following conditions: intact knee, after section of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), after section of the ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) and Kaplan fibers, after isolated ACLR, after combined ACLR+LET and ACLR+ALLR. ALLR was performed using Gracilis tendon while central strip of the ilio-tibial band was used for the modified Lemaire procedure. These different states were compared using a Tukey paired comparison test. Results: In combined ACL and anterolateral deficient knee, anterior translation and internal rotation remained significantly increased after isolated ACLR compared to intact knee (+2.33 ± 1.44 mm and +1.98 ± 1.06°; p > 0.01). On the other hand, the addition of an ALLR or a modified Lemaire LET to the ACLR allowed to restore anterior translation and internal rotation to values similar to the intact knee. Finally, the two anterolateral procedures had not significantly different values in both tests. This difference was 0.67 ± 1.46 mm for anterior translation (p=0.79) and 0.11 ± 1.11° for internal rotation (p=0.99). Conclusion: In ACL and anterolateral deficient knee, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction allowed restoration of native stability of the knee in anterior translation and internal rotation contrary to isolated ACLR. Additionally, both types of extra-articular reconstruction, ALLR or modified Lemaire procedure, were similar in terms of restoring knee kinematics and neither overconstrained the knee.

scholarly journals Different anterolateral procedures have variable impact on knee kinematics and stability when performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2019-000360
Author(s):  
Thomas Neri ◽  
Danè Dabirrahmani ◽  
Aaron Beach ◽  
Samuel Grasso ◽  
Sven Putnis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Rotational Laxity ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Deficient Knee ◽  
Intact Knee

ObjectiveThe optimal anterolateral procedure to control anterolateral rotational laxity of the knee is still unknown. The objective was to compare the ability of five anterolateral procedures performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to restore native knee kinematics in the setting of a deficient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral structures.MethodsA controlled laboratory study was performed using 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric whole lower limbs with intact iliotibial band. Kinematics from 0° to 90° of flexion were recorded using a motion analysis three-dimensional (3D) optoelectronic system, allowing assessment of internal rotation (IR) and anteroposterior (AP) tibial translation at 30° and 90° of flexion. Joint centres and bony landmarks were calculated from 3D bone models obtained from CT scans. Intact knee kinematics were assessed initially, followed by sequential section of the ACL and anterolateral structures (anterolateral ligament, anterolateral capsule and Kaplan fibres). After ACLR, five anterolateral procedures were performed consecutively on the same knee: ALLR, modified Ellison, deep Lemaire, superficial Lemaire and modified MacIntosh. The last three procedures were randomised. For each procedure, the graft was fixed in neutral rotation at 30° of flexion and with a tension of 20 N.ResultsIsolated ACLR did not restore normal overall knee kinematics in a combined ACL plus anterolateral-deficient knee, leaving a residual tibial rotational laxity (p=0.034). Only the ALLR (p=0.661) and modified Ellison procedure (p=0.641) restored overall IR kinematics to the normal intact state. Superficial and deep Lemaire and modified MacIntosh tenodeses overconstrained IR, leading to shifted and different kinematics compared with the intact condition (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.045, respectively). Compared with ACLR state, addition of an anterolateral procedure did not induce any additional control on AP translation at 30° and 90° of flexion (all p>0.05), except for the superficial Lemaire procedure at 90° (p=0.032).ConclusionIn biomechanical in vitro setting, a comparison of five anterolateral procedures revealed that addition of either ALLR or modified Ellison procedure restored overall native knee kinematics in a combined ACL plus anterolateral-deficient knee. Superficial and deep Lemaire and modified MacIntosh tenodeses achieved excellent rotational control but overconstrained IR, leading to a change from intact knee kinematics.Level of evidenceThe level-of-evidence statement does not apply for this laboratory experiments study.

There Are No Kinematic Differences Between Inframeniscal and Suprameniscal Anterolateral Ligament Injury in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Deficient Knee

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (14) ◽  
pp. 3391-3399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. Burkhart ◽  
Manoj Matthew ◽  
W. Scott McGuffin ◽  
Alexandra Blokker ◽  
David Holdsworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Acl Deficient ◽  
Deficient Knee

Background: Previous research demonstrated that the attachment of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) to the lateral meniscus is stiffer and stronger in its tibial attachment than its femoral attachment. How this relates to anterolateral knee stability and lateral meniscal function is unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: The hypothesis was that the ALL acts as a peripheral anchor to the lateral meniscus, aiding in anterolateral rotatory stability, and that the inframeniscal fibers of the ALL will provide greater anterolateral rotatory stability because of their greater tensile properties. The purpose was therefore to compare the difference in kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient knee between the infra- and suprameniscal ALL-sectioned states. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight paired fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested in a 5–degree of freedom loading jig under the following loading conditions: 5-N·m internal rotation at 15° incremental angles of flexion and combined 5-N·m internal rotation moment, 10-N·m valgus moment, and 88-N anterior translation force representing a pivot shift test at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion. The knees were tested under intact, ACL-deficient, and ACL-/ALL-deficient conditions, with the pairs of knees being randomized to either supra- or inframeniscal ALL sectioning. Resultant joint kinematics and tibiofemoral translations were measured and compared with a 2-way mixed repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Internal rotation increased by 3° after sectioning of the ACL at 0° of knee flexion ( P = .035). At 45° of knee flexion, internal rotation increased significantly by 2° between the ACL-deficient and the ACL-/ALL-deficient conditions ( P = .049). Secondary kinematics of valgus and anterior translation were observed in response to the 5-N·m load after ACL and ALL sectioning. Analysis of the pivot shift showed increases in tibiofemoral translation after sectioning of the ACL, with further translations after sectioning of the ALL. No differences were observed between supra- and inframeniscal ALL sectioning under any of the loading conditions. Conclusion: An injury to the ALL, coexisting with ACL deficiency, results in only minor increases in knee joint patholaxity. No differences in pivot-shift kinematics or tibiofemoral rotations were observed between the supra- and inframeniscal sectioning of the ALL in the ACL-deficient knee Clinical Relevance: Tears of the midbody and/or posterior root attachment of the lateral meniscus are often observed at the time of ACL reconstruction. Increased anterolateral rotatory laxity has been observed in both lateral meniscus– and ALL-deficient states in combination with an ACL injury. While no significant functional relationship was found between the ALL and lateral meniscus, ALL sectioning did result in increased knee joint patholaxity, as demonstrated by composite tibiofemoral rotations.

scholarly journals Graft Preparation for Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction With a Single Femoral Tunnel

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263502542110045
Author(s):  
Camilo Partezani Helito ◽  
Tales Mollica Guimarães ◽  
Marcel Faraco Sobrado
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Semitendinosus Graft ◽  
Lemaire Procedure

Background: Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has shown excellent results. It could potentially reduce graft failure and improve outcomes in high-risk patients. There are several surgical techniques described. Hamstrings are the most frequently used graft for ALL reconstruction. The distal portion of the iliotibial band is used for the modified Lemaire procedure. Indications: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions associated with the following risk factors: pivoting sports, high-demand athletes, high-grade pivot-shift, chronic ACL injury, lateral femoral condyle notch, Segond fractures, young patients (<20 years), ACL revision, generalized hyperlaxity, and Lachman >7 mm. Technique Description: Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons are harvested and their extremities are prepared with continuous suture. The semitendinosus graft is folded in 3 parts leaving the ends of the graft internalized. The triple semitendinosus will be the main component of the ACL and the single gracilis will be used for both ACL and ALL. Anterolateral ligament anatomical landmarks are proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle in the femur, and in the mid distance from the fibular head and the Gerdy tubercle in the tibia. The ALL is fixed in knee extension with interference screws. This video also includes a brief demonstration of graft preparation for the modified Lemaire procedure. Results: Results from our group using this technique have shown excellent clinical outcomes, minimal complications, and low failure rates in high-risk populations. This graft preparation shows excellent diameter and length for combined ACL and ALL reconstruction. Conclusion: This technique is easy to perform, with minimal complications, and should be considered in high-risk patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e23-e29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Romain Delaloye ◽  
Jozef Murar ◽  
Thais Dutra Vieira ◽  
Adnan Saithna ◽  
Johannes Barth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament ◽  
Ligament Repair ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair ◽  
Anterior Cruciate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document