scholarly journals Result of single stage early surgical treatment of high-grade multiligamentous knee injuries (Schenck Type III, IV and V)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9_suppl7) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0051
Author(s):  
Arvind Prasad Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Multiligament Knee Injury ◽  
Early Surgical Treatment

Introduction: The Multiligament Knee Injury is a complex knee problem and mostly associated with subluxation or dislocation of knee joint. Failure to diagnose and treat them appropriately can leads to devastating outcome particularly high-grade injury (Schenck Type 3,4 and 5). We favor single stage early surgical treatment of high grade Multiligament knee injury which leads to good functional outcome and return to work. Hypotheses: Single stage early surgical treatment of high grade Multiligament knee injury will leads to good functional outcome with higher IKDC and Lysholm score and helps the patients to in return early to work with higher satisfaction rate. Methods: From June 2013 to January 2020, 42 patients with age from 18 years to 56 years with acute (< 6 weeks) Multiligament knee injury included in surgical treatment. Patients with neurovascular injury were not included in study. From 42 patients, 28 patients was type 3,8 patients was type 4 and 6 patients was type 5 in this study. In all 42 patients, single stage treatment first Intraarticular ligament (anterior cruciate ligament ACL, posterior cruciate ligament PCL or both) reconstruction done by arthroscopic method then Extraarticular ligament (medial collateral ligament MCL, lateral collateral ligament LCL, Posterolateral corner PLC) treated with repair/augmentation/reconstruction depending upon status of ligaments by open method. We used only autograft (hamstring and peroneal longus tendon) of same limb or contralateral limb. Patient evaluation done with IKDC and Lyshlom score both in preoperative and postoperative period. Patient limb was kept in full extention in brace and started with aggressive physiotherapy with passive ROM at 2 weeks in post operative period . Follow up done at 2 weeks then every 6 weeks interval till 6 months then every 3 months interval. Partial weight bearing started at 6 weeks and full weight bearing usually between 10 weeks to 12 weeks. Results: Road traffic accident was the most common cause of Multiligament knee injury. Average follow up was 4 years (range 2 to 6.5 years) .40 % has excellent ,40% has good and 20% has average result. There was a significant improvement in both outcome scores as compared with the preoperative scores. Postoperatively average IKDC was 78 and Lyshlom was 86. Terminal restriction of knee movement was in 19% patients particularly those associated with medial side injury was the major complication in our study. Manipulation under anaesthesia was done in 4 cases and implant removal in 1 case and arthroscopic synovectomy and long term antibiotic in 1 case who develop early infection. Gade 1 posterior laxity and grade 1 varus stress was observed in 10 patints.Recovery after surgery takes 9 to 12 months of rehabilitation prior to returning to full activities. Conclusion: Proper evaluation and full diagnosis is key in Multiligament injury of knee. Failure to treat all injured structure can lead to change in knee kinematics and poorer outcome and increased risk for graft failure.Operative treatment with proper rehabilitation yields good functional and clinical outcome with early return to work and sports activity.

Development and Assessment of Novel Multiligament Knee Injury Reconstruction Graft Constructs and Techniques

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Cook ◽  
Cristi R. Cook ◽  
Chantelle C. Bozynski ◽  
Will A. Bezold ◽  
James P. Stannard
Keyword(s):  
Knee Injury ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Posterior Oblique Ligament ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Multiligament Knee Injury

AbstractMultiligament knee injury (MLKI) typically requires surgical reconstruction to achieve the optimal outcomes for patients. Revision and failure rates after surgical reconstruction for MLKI can be as high as 40%, suggesting the need for improvements in graft constructs and implantation techniques. This study assessed novel graft constructs and surgical implantation and fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), posterior medial corner (PMC), and posterior lateral corner (PLC) reconstruction. Study objectives were (1) to describe each construct and technique in detail, and (2) to optimize MLKI reconstruction surgical techniques using these constructs so as to consistently implant grafts in correct anatomical locations while preserving bone stock and minimizing overlap. Cadaveric knees (n = 3) were instrumented to perform arthroscopic-assisted and open surgical creation of sockets and tunnels for all components of MLKI reconstruction using our novel techniques. Sockets and tunnels with potential for overlap were identified and assessed to measure the minimum distances between them using gross, computed tomographic, and finite element analysis-based measurements. Percentage of bone volume spared for each knee was also calculated. Femoral PLC-lateral collateral ligament and femoral PMC sockets, as well as tibial PCL and tibial PMC posterior oblique ligament sockets, were at high risk for overlap. Femoral ACL and femoral PLC lateral collateral ligament sockets and tibial popliteal tendon and tibial posterior oblique ligament sockets were at moderate risk for overlap. However, with careful planning based on awareness of at-risk MLKI graft combinations in conjunction with protection of the socket/tunnel and trajectory adjustment using fluoroscopic guidance, the novel constructs and techniques allow for consistent surgical reconstruction of all major ligaments in MLKIs such that socket and tunnel overlap can be consistently avoided. As such, the potential advantages of the constructs, including improved graft-to-bone integration, capabilities for sequential tensioning of the graft, and bone sparing effects, can be implemented.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction after Surgical Management of Multiligament Knee Injury

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Worley ◽  
Olubusola Brimmo ◽  
Clayton W. Nuelle ◽  
Bradford P. Zitsch ◽  
Emily V. Leary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Multiligament Knee Injury ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with the need for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) after multiligament knee injury (MLKI) and to report outcomes for patients undergoing revision ACLR after MLKI. This involves a retrospective review of 231 MLKIs in 225 patients treated over a 12-year period, with institutional review board approval. Patients with two or more injured knee ligaments requiring surgical reconstruction, including the ACL, were included for analyses. Overall, 231 knees with MLKIs underwent ACLR, with 10% (n = 24) requiring revision ACLR. There were no significant differences in age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, or body mass index between cohorts requiring or not requiring revision ACLR. However, patients requiring revision ACLR had significantly longer follow-up duration (55.1 vs. 37.4 months, p = 0.004), more ligament reconstructions/repairs (mean 3.0 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001), more nonligament surgeries (mean 2.2 vs. 0.7, p = 0.002), more total surgeries (mean 5.3 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001), and more graft reconstructions (mean 4.7 vs. 2.7, p < 0.001). Patients in both groups had similar return to work (p = 0.12) and activity (p = 0.91) levels at final follow-up. Patients who had revision ACLR took significantly longer to return to work at their highest level (18 vs. 12 months, p = 0.036), but similar time to return to their highest level of activity (p = 0.33). Range of motion (134 vs. 127 degrees, p = 0.14), pain severity (2.2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.24), and Lysholm's scores (86.3 vs. 90.0, p = 0.24) at final follow-up were similar between groups. Patients requiring revision ACLR in the setting of a MLKI had more overall concurrent surgeries and other ligament reconstructions, but had similar final outcome scores to those who did not require revision surgery. Revision ligament surgery can be associated with increased pain, stiffness, and decrease patient outcomes. Revision surgery is often necessary after multiligament knee reconstructions, but patients requiring ACLR in the setting of a MLKI have good overall outcomes, with patients requiring revision ACLR at a rate of 10%.

scholarly journals Early Surgery Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures—Results from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Christopher Bliemel ◽  
Katherine Rascher ◽  
Tom Knauf ◽  
Juliana Hack ◽  
Daphne Eschbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures ◽  
Trauma Society ◽  
Eq5d Index ◽  
Early Surgical Treatment

Background and Objectives: Appropriate timing of surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in geriatric patients remains unclear. Data from a large international geriatric trauma register were analyzed to examine the outcome of patients with PFF with respect to the timing of surgical stabilization. Materials and Methods: The Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)) (ATR-DGU) was analyzed. Patients treated surgically for PFF were included in this analysis. As outcome parameters, in-house mortality rate and mortality at the 120-day follow-up as well as mobility, the EQ5D index score and reoperation rate were analyzed in relation to early (<48 h) or delayed (≥48 h) surgical stabilization. Results: A total of 1178 datasets met the inclusion criteria; 665 fractures were treated with osteosynthesis (56.4%), and 513 fractures were treated by implant change (43.5%). In contrast to the osteosynthesis group, the group with implant changes underwent delayed surgical treatment more often. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of mortality rate (p = 0.310), walking ability (p = 0.239) and EQ5D index after seven days (p = 0.812) revealed no significant differences between early (<48 h) and delayed (≥48 h) surgical stabilization. These items remained insignificant at the follow-up as well. However, the odds of requiring a reoperation within 120 days were significantly higher for delayed surgical treatment (OR: 1.86; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Early surgical treatment did not lead to decreased mortality rates in the acute phase or in the midterm. Except for the rate of reoperation, all other outcome parameters remained unaffected. Nevertheless, for most patients, early surgical treatment should be the goal, so as to achieve early mobilization and avoid secondary nonsurgical complications. If early stabilization is not possible, it can be assumed that orthogeriatric co-management will help protect these patients from further harm.

scholarly journals Single-Stage Arthroscopic Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repairs and Open Medial Collateral Ligament Repair for Acute Knee Dislocation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ryo Murakami ◽  
Eisaburo Honda ◽  
Atsushi Fukai ◽  
Hiroki Yoshitomi ◽  
Takaki Sanada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Knee Dislocation ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Lateral Condyle ◽  
Ligament Repair ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Medial Condyle

Till date, there are no clear guidelines regarding the treatment of multiple ligament knee injuries. Ligament repair is advantageous as it preserves proprioception and does not involve grafting. Many studies have reported the use of open repair and reconstruction for multiple ligament knee injuries; however, reports on arthroscopic-combined single-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repairs are scarce. In this report, we describe a case of type III knee dislocation (ACL, PCL, and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries) in a 43-year-old man, caused by contact while playing futsal. On the sixth day after injury, arthroscopic ACL and PCL repairs were performed with open MCL repair. The proximal lesions in the three ligaments that were injured were sutured using no. 2 strong surgical sutures. The ACL was pulled out to the lateral condyle of the femur and fixed using a suspensory fixation device. The PCL was pulled out to the medial condyle of the femur, and the MCL was pulled towards the proximal end of the femur; both were fixed using suture anchors. Early mobilization was performed, and both, clinical and imaging outcomes, were good two years after surgery.

Tibiotarsal arthroscopy

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Beale ◽  
J. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Joint Stability ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Long Term Outcome

SummaryThe objective of this retrospective article was to describe the use of, and to determine long-term outcome of, tibiotarsal arthroscopy in dogs. The medical records of 20 client-owned dogs with tibiotarsal joint disease with arthroscopic treatment were reviewed. Long-term follow-up evaluation of lameness, force plate gait analysis, and radiographs to assess progression of degenerative joint disease (DJD) were performed. Arthroscopy was utilized in the diagnosis of talar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), collateral ligament injury, septic arthritis, immune mediated arthritis, and a distal talar fragment. Sixteen joints with OCD treated resulted in 10/14 dogs with lameness after exercise only, progression of DJD in most cases, and chronic lameness when comparing operated to unoperated limbs with force plate evaluation at a mean follow-up of 35 months. Following treatment, three dogs with collateral ligament injury had reduced weight bearing on the operated limb, radiographic progression of DJD, and minimal lameness at a mean follow-up of 27 months. Tibiotarsal arthroscopy can be successfully used to help diagnose, and often to treat: OCD, collateral ligament injury, fractures, septic and non-septic arthritis in the dog. The minimally invasive nature of arthroscopy preserved joint stability while allowing complete examination of the articular cartilage. In most cases long term tibiotarsal DJD advancement was the rule.

scholarly journals Treatment of Catastrophic Failures of Achilles Tendon Repairs Due to Deep Wound Complications

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0000
Author(s):  
Jamal Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Deep Wound Infection ◽  
Deep Wound ◽  
Catastrophic Failures

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: The Achilles tendon is the most commonly injured tendon in the lower extremity. Whether these ruptures are acute or chronic, a surgical Achilles repair or reconstruction is often needed to restore tendon integrity and function. Risks from such surgeries include superficial or deep wound infections and/or dehiscence. To date, there is scant literature regarding the treatment of catastrophic failures of Achilles tendon repairs or reconstructions from deep wound infection and dehiscence. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively examine clinical outcomes from uniform single-stage surgical treatment of catastrophic failures of Achilles tendon repairs or reconstructions from deep wound complications. Methods: Between 2007 and 2016, 10 patients developed a deep wound infection and dehiscence after surgical treatment of an acute or chronic Achilles rupture. Medical co-morbidities included obesity in 4, diabetes in 3, and nicotine use in 2 patients. Six and 4 patients had a mid-substance and insertional Achilles rupture respectively. Three patients had an acute injury that received an end-to-end suture repair. Seven patients had a chronic injury with Achilles retraction, which necessitated proximal Achilles or gastrocnemius lengthening. These patients required surgery for their wound problem due to depth and involvement of their Achilles repair/reconstruction site. Surgery involved a single-stage wound irrigation and debridement, Achilles excisional debridement at the repair/reconstruction site, flexor hallucis longus transfer to the calcaneus to replace the compromised or failed Achilles repair/reconstruction, and primary or vacuum assisted wound closure. Patients were followed for 6 months after this surgery and invited for recent follow-up to collect data. Results: With uniform surgical treatment, full resolution of deep wound infection and dehiscence after Achilles repair/reconstruction was achieved in all 10 patients. No patients developed a recurrence of wound complications and/or infection to necessitate any further surgical debridements. All 10 patients presented for recent follow-up at a mean of 57.3 months. Mean Foot and Ankle Ability Measures increased from 36.3% at initial presentation before Achilles repair/reconstructive surgery to 84.2% at latest follow-up (P<0.05). Mean Visual Analog Scores of pain decreased from 6.6 of 10 before the Achilles repair/reconstruction to 1.5 of 10 at latest follow-up (P<0.05). All patients were able to return to normal gait and full activities at home, with 3 reporting difficulties with prolonged ankle activities at work. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that our method of single-stage surgical treatment of catastrophic failures of Achilles tendon repairs or reconstructions from deep wound complications can achieve a high rate of improved patient function and pain relief. Clinical outcomes of treating patients with this particular complication of Achilles repair/reconstruction in this manner have not been previously reported in the orthopaedic literature. As catastrophic failures of Achilles tendon repairs or reconstructions from deep wound complications are studied further, our method of surgical care should be strongly considered as treatment.

scholarly journals Return to Sports after Acute Simultaneous Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Grade III Medial Collateral Ligament Injury

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0003
Author(s):  
Agustin Bertona ◽  
Juan Pablo Zicaro ◽  
Juan Manuel Gonzalez Viescas ◽  
Nicolas Atala ◽  
Carlos Yacuzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Simultaneous Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Grade Iii

Objectives: Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury and Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) injury account for 20% of knee ligament lesions. Conservative treatment of MCL and surgical ACL reconstruction are generally recommended. Significant medial instability after non-surgical management of MCL can lead to ACL reconstruction failure. The optimal management for athletes with combined ACL-MCL injuries remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional and clinical evolution of patients who underwent combined ACL-MCL surgery and their return-to-sport level with minimum 2-years follow-up. Methods: A total of 20 athletes with acute simultaneous ACL/Grade III MCL reconstructions were treated between March 2006 and January 2014. The minimum follow-up time was 24 months. Subjective functional results (IKDC, Lysholm), range of motion, anterior-medial and rotational stability (Lachmann, Pivot Shift, valgus stress) were evaluated. The ability to return to sport (Tegner) and the level achieved was recorded. Results: All patients significantly improved functional scores and stability tests. The mean subjective IKDC score improved from 37.7 ± 12.9 (range 21-69) preoperatively to 88.21 ± 4.47 (range 80-96) postoperatively (P <0.05). The average Lysholm score was 40.44 ± 10.58 (range 27-65) preoperatively and 90.83 ± 3.38 (range 84-95) postoperatively (P <0.05). Valgus and sagittal laxity was not observed (IKDC A 92% B 8%) at final follow-up. All patients had normal/nearly normal (IKDC A or B) mobility. All patients returned to sports; 90% reached the level they had prior to the ligamentous injury. Of all competitive athletes, 66% achieved the same level of sport. Conclusion: In athletes with acute ACL-Grade III MCL lesions, an early simultaneous reconstruction can significantly improve the medial and sagittal stability of the knee. This procedure resulted in excellent functional outcomes, with return to the same level of sports in the majority of patients at short-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Effect of Concomitant Cartilage Lesions on Patient-Reported Outcome After ACL-Reconstruction-A Nationwide Cohort Study from Norway and Sweden of 8470 Patients With 5-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0005
Author(s):  
Svend Ulstein ◽  
Asbjorn Aroen ◽  
Magnus L. Forssblad ◽  
Lars Engebretsen ◽  
Jan Harald Røtterud
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cartilage Lesion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Knee Ligament ◽  
Cartilage Lesions ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Patient Reported

Objectives: To evaluate (1) the effect of concomitant partial-thickness (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grades 1-2) and full-thickness (ICRS grades 3-4) cartilage lesions on patient-reported outcome 5 years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR), and (2) the effect of debridement or microfracture (MF) compared with no treatment of concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesions on patient-reported outcome 5 years after ACLR. Methods: All patients that underwent unilateral primary ACLR registered in the Norwegian and Swedish National Knee Ligament Registries from 2005 through 2008 (n = 15,783) were included the study. At the 5-year follow-up, 8470 (54%) patients completed The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). A subgroup of all patients with concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesions (n = 644), treated with debridement (n = 129), or MF (n = 164), or no surgical treatment (n = 351) at the time of ACLR, was included in the treatment component of the study. At the 5-year follow-up, 368 (57%) patients completed the KOOS. Linear regression models were used to estimate the effect of concomitant focal cartilage lesions on the patient-reported outcome (KOOS) 5 years after ACLR, and to estimate the effect of surgical debridement or MF of concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesions, on patient-reported outcome 5 years after ACLR. Results: Of the 8470 patients available for follow-up at 5 years, 2248 (27%) had 1 or more concomitant cartilage lesions at the time of ACLR, comprised of 1685 (20%) patients with 1 or more partial-thickness cartilage lesions and 563 (7%) patients with 1 or more full-thickness cartilage lesions. Of the 368 patients available for the 5-year follow-up in the treatment component of the study, 203 (55%) patients received no surgical treatment to their full-thickness cartilage lesion at the time of ACLR, 70 (19%) were treated with debridement and 95 (26%) with MF. In the adjusted analyses, partial-thickness cartilage lesions showed significant associations with inferior KOOS scores at follow-up in all subscales. Full-thickness cartilage lesions were significantly associated with inferior KOOS scores in all subscales, both in the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses. With no treatment of the concomitant cartilage lesion as the reference, no significant effects of debridement or MF were detected in the unadjusted or adjusted regression analyses in any of the KOOS subscales at the 5-year follow-up. However, there was a trend in both the unadjusted and adjusted analyses towards negative effects of MF in the KOOS subscales Sport/Rec and QoL with regression coefficient (β) of -5; 95% CI, -12.3-2.2 and -5.7; 95% CI, -12.5-1.1, respectively. Conclusion: ACL-injured patients with concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesions reported worse outcomes and less improvement than those without cartilage lesions 5 years after ACLR. Compared to leaving concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesions untreated at the time of ACLR, debridement and MF showed no effect on patient-reported outcome at 5-year follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document