scholarly journals Complete and partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears provide sustainable long term improvement in clinical scores

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0000
Author(s):  
Marion Besnard ◽  
Benjamin Freychet ◽  
Julien Clechet ◽  
Yannick Carrillon ◽  
Arnaud Godenèche

Objectives: The aim was to report results of arthroscopic repair of 86 massive cuff tears and decided to assess whether or not clinical scores were maintained 5 years later. Methods: Of the initial series of 86 shoulders, 2 patients died, 16 were lost to follow-up and 4 had a repeat surgery. Therefore, it was possible to reevaluate 64 patients. Repairs were complete in 44 cases and partial in 20 cases. Seventeen shoulders were pseudoparalytic. Tears with fatty degeneration at stage 4 or higher according to the Goutallier classification were not eligible for repair. Preoperatively, the Constant Score (CS), shoulder strength, location of the tear, tendon retraction and degree of fatty infiltration were assessed. Patients were assessed at 8.1±0.6 years [7.1-9.3] using absolute and age- and sex-adjusted CS, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and the simple shoulder test (SST). Results: The absolute CS was 80.0±11.7 at the first follow-up (at 2-5 years) and decreased to 76.7±10.2 at the last follow-up (at 7-10 years) (p<0.001). The adjusted CS was 99.7±15.9 at the first follow-up and remained at 98.8±15.9 at the last follow-up (ns.). In terms of the other criteria, strength decreased over time (p<0.001) but pain, SSV and SST remained the same. Partial repairs had less strength at the first and last follow-up (p<0.05). Pseudoparalytic shoulders had a lower absolute and adjusted CS at the last follow-up (p<0.05) but the improvement in CS was greater (p=0.014). Conclusion: Partial and complete arthroscopic repair provide good long-term results in patients with massive rotator cuff tears, regardless of the location of the tear, the degree of fat infiltration (I to III according to the Goutallier classification) and even in case of a pseudoparalytic shoulder.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0035
Author(s):  
Ivan Wong ◽  
Sara Sparavalo ◽  
Jie Ma ◽  
Nedal Alkhatib

Objectives: Large or massive rotator cuff tears make up between 10-40% of all rotator cuff tears, yet there is no agreement on the best treatment. Previous studies have shown that acellular human dermal allograft (AHDA) can be used for bridging reconstruction with positive patient outcomes. The use of this surgical technique has not been extensively studied in the primary or revision surgical setting. The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who received primary or revision arthroscopic bridging reconstruction. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of a sequential series of patients who underwent arthroscopic bridging reconstruction (ABR) using AHDA by the primary author (IW). A total of 130 patients underwent ABR between 2010 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were patients with completed Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, or both pre-operatively and at multiple post-operative timepoints. Patients with missing WORC scores were excluded from the study. Eighty-three patients were included following chart review. Patients with available post-operative MRIs were also used for radiological assessment by an independent MSK-trained radiologist. Post-operative MRIs were reviewed to assess for graft integrity and changes to rotator cuff muscle atrophy (using the Warner classification) and fatty degeneration (using the Goutallier classification). Results: There were 46 patients who received primary ABR and 37 who received revision ABR. Forty-eight patients had a post-operative MRI available for review (Primary: 25; Revision: 23). The demographics are summarized in Table 1. Both groups showed a significant improvement in WORC score post-operatively (p<0.001). Primary ABR resulted in higher post-operative WORC scores as compared to revision ABR (p=0.015; Figure 1). The incidence of complete re-tears in the primary group was 8% and 17.4% in the revision group. More than 35% of patients in the primary group showed improvement in fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and supraspinatus muscles. There was a higher progression in muscle atrophy in the revision group as compared to the primary group (74% and 30%, respectively). Conclusions: Arthroscopic primary arthroscopic bridging reconstruction for large/massive rotator cuff tears using acellular human dermal allograft had better improvement in their WORC scores compared to revision group at the final follow-up. Although the revision group had improved at the two-year follow-up, these changes in WORC score were not sustained at the final follow-up while the improvements were maintained for the primary group. The primary group had a smaller re-tear rate, better fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy as compared to the revision group. This suggests that primary bridging reconstruction provides better outcomes than a revision surgery.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110081
Author(s):  
Nihar S. Shah ◽  
Emil Suriel Peguero ◽  
Yuta Umeda ◽  
Zachary T. Crawford ◽  
Brian M Grawe

Background: With an increase in the treatment options available for massive rotator cuff tears, understanding the long-term outcomes of the chosen modality is important. Questions/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the available literature on repair of massive rotator cuff repairs and learn the longevity of outcomes, the failure rate, outcomes after failure, and any contributing factors to poor outcomes or failure. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases to find studies that investigated the long-term results of repair of massive rotator cuff repairs. Studies were excluded if they did not stratify results of massive tears, provide a definition for a massive rotator cuff tear, or report isolate patients with long-term follow-up. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 472 shoulders; average patient age was 57.6 years. Follow-up ranged from 119 to 240 months. Outcome scores improved significantly following repair and were maintained throughout follow-up. The repair failure rate across studies was 39.2%. Patients who suffered retear had significantly worse outcome scores than patients with intact tendons at long-term follow-up. Conclusions: The existing literature on long-term follow-up after massive rotator cuff repair is scarce and not of high level of evidence. This review found repair of massive rotator cuff tears leads to long-term maintained improvements in outcome measures. Failure of repair is quite common, but results following failure are superior to preoperative outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 546-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Alexander König ◽  
Volker Alexander Braunstein

Introduction: Massive tears in the rotator cuff are debilitating pathologies normally associated with loss of function and pain. Tendon reconstruction is seen as the standard treatment in order to preserve shoulder function and to inhibit cuff associated osteoarthritis. However, the effect on longer-term shoulder function and patient satisfaction is unknown. Material and Methods: 165 consecutive patients with massive tears were included. 57 debridement (mean age 61.9±8.7 years (range 43-77)) and 108 reconstruction (mean age 57.5±8.9 years (range 45-74)) cases could be followed up 2-4 (short-term), 5-6 (mid-term) and 8-10 (long-term) years after surgery. Evaluation was performed with the Constant, a modified ASES and the DASH score. Statistical analysis was done using Sigma-Stat Version 3.5 with a p-value<0.05 indicating statistical significant differences. Results: All three scoring systems showed no significant differences in the short-term follow-up for the two groups (mean values: Constant debridement/repair: 70±11.9/66±13.6; ASES debridement/repair: 22.3±3.3/ 23.3±3.3; DASH debridement/repair: 22.3±11.0/ 24.3±10.1). In the mid-term (Constant debridement/repair: 51±2.9/68.3±5.2; ASES debridement/repair: 20.3±1.3/24.3±1.7; DASH debridement/repair: 31.0±6.5/20.3±5.4) and long-term follow-up (Constant debridement/repair: 42.3±3.8 /60.7±2.6, ASES debridement/repair: 17.3±0.5/21.7±0.5, DASH debridement/repair: 41.3±6.2/25.0±1.4), rotator cuff reconstruction revealed better objective results and better patients’ satisfaction. Conclusion: Rotator cuff tendon repair leads to better long-term clinical outcome and subjective satisfaction compared to debridement. Tendon reconstruction should be considered as a treatment for patients suffering from massive rotator cuff tears, thus preserving shoulder function and by that means delay indication for reverse arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712096010
Author(s):  
Erik J. Sarkissian ◽  
Michelle Xiao ◽  
Geoffrey D. Abrams

Background: The teres minor is a critical component of the rotator cuff and serves as one of the few external rotators of the humerus. Information is lacking regarding the effect of teres minor atrophy in isolation and in the setting of concomitant full-thickness rotator cuff tears on outcomes in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. Purpose: To investigate the effect of preoperative teres minor fatty infiltration on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with and without full-thickness rotator cuff pathology. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary arthroscopic shoulder surgery between 2014 and 2016 was performed. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine fatty infiltration for each rotator cuff muscle using the modified Goutallier classification. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) as well as the shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were obtained preoperatively and during follow-up. Exclusion criteria included prior surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder or a diagnosis of inflammatory arthropathy. For analysis, patients were dichotomized to grade 0 or grade 1-4 atrophy of the teres minor as well as to full-thickness or partial-thickness rotator cuff pathology. Results: A total of 36 of 47 (76.6%) patients (mean age, 63 years; range, 45-76 years) were available for postoperative follow-up at a mean of 40 months (range, 30-48 months). Postoperative ASES score was significantly higher and QuickDASH score was significantly lower among all patients in the grade 0 group compared with the grade 1-4 group. Postoperative ASES and QuickDASH scores were not significantly different in patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears at any time point. However, the postoperative ASES score was significantly higher and QuickDASH score was significantly lower in the grade 0 versus grade 1-4 group for patients with full-thickness rotator cuff pathology. Conclusion: Preoperative teres minor atrophy in patients undergoing surgery for rotator cuff pathology may impair postoperative clinical outcomes, especially in patients with full-thickness tears.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document