Local Lexicon Extraction and Language Processing in Facilitating Language Awareness and Informing User-Centered Design in the Health Care Environment

Author(s):  
Tim Arnold ◽  
Helen J. A. Fuller

The written word is a ubiquitous, critical, and time-sensitive design feature in the health care environment. Language critically influences understanding, decision making and subsequent actions. Words can influence usability, be confusing and cluttering, contribute to distraction and task disruption, and subsequently contribute to issues with clinician workload and patient safety. Design team members often hotly and at length deliberate over word selection during user centered design (UCD) efforts. Usability evaluation methods, when applied, can be valuable in facilitating a match between the system and the language spoken by users. In particular, usability evaluations can help designers identify confusing and ambiguous words and may suggest alternative choices. However, even with a hearty approach to design, word selection can be a bear of a task. This task can be time consuming, resource intensive, and frustrating for the design team, and suboptimal term selection may increase the risk of patient harm. The purpose of this paper is to encourage discussion on the use of natural language processing (NLP) approaches in facilitating local language awareness and informing UCD. The use of NLP in the health care domain is well documented when applied to narrative text for assisting in behind-the-scenes clinical decision support mechanisms and for assisting in risk analysis. Additionally, NLP may also be a valuable arrow in the designer’s quiver to inform conceptual design and the selection of user-facing terminology. This discussion attempts to expand upon documented uses of NLP in health care to its use in informing the selection of terminological design features with an emphasis on local design efforts in fostering safer patient care environments.

1990 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-380
Author(s):  
David A. Hyman

Tax exemption is an ancient, honorable and expensive tradition. Tax exemption for hospitals is all of these three, but it also places in sharp focus a fundamental problem with tax exemption in general. Organizations can retain their tax exemption while changing circumstances or expectations undermine the rationale that led to the exemption in the first place. Hospitals are perhaps the best example of this problem. The dramatic changes in the health care environment have eliminated most of the characteristics of a hospital that originally persuaded the citizenry to grant it an exemption. Hospitals have entered into competition with tax-paying businesses, and have increasingly behaved like competitive actors. Such conduct may well be beneficial, but it does not follow that tax exemption is appropriate. Rather than an undifferentiated subsidy, a shift to focused goals will provide charitable hospitals with the opportunity and incentive to “do the right thing.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document