scholarly journals Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142110105
Author(s):  
Sepehr Feizi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Javadi ◽  
Seyed-Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion ◽  
Mohammad Abolhosseini

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) against deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). Methods: Keratoconic patients with VKC who received PK ( n = 55, group 1) or DALK ( n = 62, group 2) were retrospectively enrolled. The Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test, Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and Kaplan–Meier survival curve were used to compare outcomes between the groups. Results: The follow-up period was 59.4 ± 44.1 and 62.4 ± 38.9 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( p = 0.70). Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.24 ± 0.18 and 0.29 ± 0.19 logMAR, respectively ( p = 0.13). Graft rejection occurred in 34.6% and 25.8% of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( p = 0.30). Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in the rates of cataract (3.6% and 12.9%, respectively, p = 0.07) and high intraocular pressure (3.6% and 8.1%, respectively, p = 0.31). Compared with the eyes with inactive VKC, PK eyes that experienced postoperative disease reactivation had a higher rate of suture abscesses (10.9% versus 50.0%, respectively, p = 0.01) and suture-tract vascularization (6.5% versus 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.03). Similarly, disease reactivation significantly increased suture abscesses from 27.3% to 51.7% ( p = 0.03) and suture-tract vascularization from 18.2% to 49.6% ( p = 0.005) in the DALK group. The graft survival rates were 95.3% in group 1 and 87.9% in group 2 at the 4-year follow-up, with mean durations of 14.4 and 11.1 months, respectively ( p = 0.20). Conclusion: The results indicate no difference in outcomes between PK and DALK for keratoconus in patients with VKC. Postoperative VKC reactivation increased the rate of suture-related problems after both techniques of keratoplasty.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2421
Author(s):  
Dominika Janiszewska-Bil ◽  
Barbara Czarnota-Nowakowska ◽  
Katarzyna Krysik ◽  
Anita Lyssek-Boroń ◽  
Dariusz Dobrowolski ◽  
...  

We compared the visual and refractive outcomes, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell loss (ECL), and adverse events in keratoconus patients after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) below 0.3 (logMAR 0.52). This is a prospective, comparative cohort study of 90 eyes (90 patients) with a clinical diagnosis of keratoconus. Patients underwent a complete eye examination before the surgical approach, 6 and 12 months postoperatively that consisted of BCVA, refractive astigmatism (AS), central corneal thickness (CCT), IOP, and ECL. Secondary outcomes were adverse events related to the surgical procedure. With lower ECL and less adverse events, DALK was revealed to be beneficial over PK with similar visual outcomes. Results: There was no significant difference between the BCVA in the DALK and PK groups (at 6 months: 0.49 ± 0.17 vs. 0.48 ± 0.17; p = 0.48; at 12 months: 0.54 ± 0.17 vs. 0.52 ± 0.14; p = 0.41). The mean value of AS was significantly lower after the PK procedure when compared to DALK, after both 6 and 12 months of follow up (p < 0.001). The CCT in the DALK group was significantly lower when compared to the PK group (at 6 months: 452.1 ± 89.1 µm vs. 528.9 ± 69.9 µm, p < 0.0001; at 12 months: 451.6 ± 83.5 µm vs. 525.5 ± 37.1 µm). The endothelial cell loss at 12 months after surgery was significantly lower after DALK when compared to PK (p < 0.0001). DALK transplantation should be considered as an alternative procedure in the surgical treatment of keratoconus.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Reinhart ◽  
David C. Musch ◽  
Deborah S. Jacobs ◽  
W. Barry Lee ◽  
Stephen C. Kaufman ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-459.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J.H.M. van den Biggelaar ◽  
Yanny Y.Y. Cheng ◽  
Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts ◽  
Jan S. Schouten ◽  
Robert-Jan Wijdh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belén Alfonso-Bartolozzi ◽  
Carlos Lisa ◽  
Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto ◽  
David Madrid-Costa ◽  
José F. Alfonso

Purpose: To assess the outcomes of implanting a new polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) ring (Neoring; AJL Ophthalmic) in pre-descemet deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (PD-DALK) procedure for moderate-advanced keratoconus.Methods: This prospective study included 10 eyes of 10 patients with moderate-advanced keratoconus who underwent PD-DALK with Neoring implantation. Neoring was implanted in a pre-descemetic pocket. The post-operative examination included refraction, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal tomography, and endothelial cell density (ECD). The root mean squares (RMSs) for coma-like aberrations and spherical aberration were evaluated for a pupil size of 4.5 mm. The junctional graft (Tg) and host (Th) thicknesses were measured. The post-operative follow-up was 24 months.Results: Post-operative CDVA was 0.82 ± 0.14 (decimal scale), 100% of the eyes achieved a CDVA of 0.7 (decimal scale). The refractive cylinder was −2.86 ± 1.65 2-years after surgery. No eyes had a post-operative refractive cylinder ≥5.00 D and in five eyes (50%), it was ≤2.50 D. At the last visit, the mean keratometry was 45.64 ± 1.96 D, the RMS for coma-like aberrations was 0.30 ± 0.15 μm and spherical aberration was 0.22 ± 0.09. The mean ECD remains without changes over the follow-up (P = 0.07). At the last visit, Tg and Th were 679.9 ± 39.0 and 634.8 ± 41.2 μm, respectively. The thickness of the complex (host-Neoring) was 740.6 ± 35.6 μm. In all cases, this thickness was thicker than Tg.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that PD-DALK along Neoring implantation is a viable, effective, and safe option to optimize the post-operative results for moderate-severe keratoconus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document