An Ode to Gillies and Millard: “The Ten Commandments Applied to Self-Inflicted Head and Neck Gunshot Wounds”

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110643
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Assi ◽  
Alixendra Hunzicker ◽  
John Jones ◽  
John Pemberton ◽  
Michael Samuel Golinko

Within the field of craniofacial trauma surgery, reconstruction following high-energy ballistic injuries to the face remains a daunting task requiring a multidisciplinary approach for best outcomes. These injuries are complex with large defects requiring reconstruction of different lamellae and skeletal buttresses of the face and no 2 are exactly alike. The reconstruction efforts are multidimensional and focus on restoring facial height, width, projection, jaw occlusion, and function. We present a challenging course of a 56 year old patient with a self- inflicted gunshot wound to the face that resulted in devastating injuries to the mandible and midface. We describe our multistage and multiple technique surgical approach that spanned nearly 2 years and 11 operations that included open reduction, internal fixation of extensive facial fractures, primary bone grafting, free fibula for maxillary reconstruction and palatal fistula obliteration, pre-expanded paramedian forehead flap, and mandibular distraction. In reviewing the patient’s course, his complications, and wins, we were inspired by the fundamentals principles of head and neck reconstruction as we interpreted from the famous “Ten Commandments of Drs. Gillies and Millard.” We discuss these Commandments with the reader in our reflection of this challenging reconstruction and hope others, particularly, those in training are encouraged to find application of the “Ten Commandments” we review as they develop their own surgical practices and styles.

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin L. Fackler
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1988-1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Ying Chang ◽  
Jung-Ju Huang ◽  
Chung-Kan Tsao ◽  
Anh Nguyen ◽  
Krithi Mittakanti ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ehud Fliss ◽  
Ravit Yanko ◽  
Gal Bracha ◽  
Roy Teman ◽  
Aharon Amir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The free fibula flap is commonly referred to as a “workhorse” for head and neck reconstruction. During our 21-year experience with this flap, we have performed several changes in preoperative planning, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up. Patients and Methods A retrospective cohort study designed to analyze the cohort of patients who underwent free fibula transfer for head and neck reconstruction. Demographics, medical background, operative data, and postoperative outcome were collected. The changes we performed in preoperative planning, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up were assessed and their impact on outcome discussed. Results During 1998 to 2019 a total of 128 free fibula flaps were transferred for head and neck reconstruction. When comparing the patients treated in the early years to those who were treated in recent years we found no statistically significant difference in minor or major nonmicrosurgical complications in the recipient and donor site and in the rate of take backs due to microsurgical reasons. However total flap failure rate improved from 28% in early years to 8% in recent years (p = 0.012). Conclusion During this 21-year period, we performed several changes in our practice. This included the use of a three-dimensional (3D) prefabricated model of the mandible, a shift toward side-table osteotomies, increasing the rate of osteofascial flaps in contrast to osteocutaneous flaps and the use of an implantable Doppler. These changes, together with a learning curve of the surgical team, significantly improved our overall success rates.


1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry C. Vásconez ◽  
Mark E. Shockley ◽  
Edward A. Luce
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 541e-549e ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick B. Garvey ◽  
Edward I. Chang ◽  
Jesse C. Selber ◽  
Roman J. Skoracki ◽  
John E. Madewell ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin D. Batstone ◽  
Carly M. Fox ◽  
Mary E. Dingley ◽  
C. Peter Cornelius

Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck is a widespread procedure. The aesthetic outcome is frequently compromised by color mismatch between the donor site skin and the complex pigmentation of the face. Various surgical procedures have been described to improve the appearance of external skin paddles. Medical tattooing is commonly used for nipple pigmentation in breast reconstruction and cosmetic procedures such as permanent makeup. This article describes the technique and its application to head and neck reconstruction. Medical tattooing can be used to improve the cosmetic appearance of head and neck free flaps. There is no donor site morbidity and subtle changes in color can be replicated. The article describes the technique of medical tattooing with the use of illustrative cases. Medical tattooing is a viable alternative for improving the appearance of cutaneous skin paddles following head and neck reconstruction with free flaps. Its advantages include no donor site morbidity, availability of an infinite range of colors, no requirement for general anesthesia, and the ability to use multiple colors in the one flap for complex pigmentation requirements. Its disadvantages include the need for specialized skills and equipment and the fading of color over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document