A Classification of, and a Critical Review of the Literature on, Syndromes of the Sacroiliac Joint

1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Oldreive
2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S514-S514
Author(s):  
T. Schmidt ◽  
S.W. Uldall ◽  
J. Carlsson ◽  
P. Munk-Jørgensen ◽  
K. Andersen

IntroductionMental trauma may precede persistent changes in a person's mental health in the form of psychosis and dissociation. Presently, there are no subtypes to the diagnosis of PTSD. A psychotic subtype of PTSD has been proposed, and studies show that these patients differ as well in symptoms as biologically from patients with non-psychotic PTSD. Dissociation and psychosis are generally viewed as different phenomena. Where dissociation is understood as a disintegration of the mind, psychosis is viewed as a neurodegenerative disorder on a mainly biological/genetic basis. The delineation of psychotic and dissociative symptoms is not clear however.ObjectivesOur objective is to clarify, whether psychologists and psychiatrists describe trauma-related changes of consciousness (TCC) differently as dissociative or psychotic. Furthermore, we wish to compare scientific journals, and look for differences in how psychiatrists’ and psychologists’ make use of the terms dissociation and psychosis in relation to TCC.AimsWe aim to investigate whether TCC are interpreted differently among psychiatrists and psychologists.MethodsThis study is a systematic critical review of the literature. The databases PubMed, Embase and PsychInfo will be used. Articles involving PTSD with TCC will be included. Studies will be classified as viewing TCC's as either psychotic or dissociative, based on the terms the authors use to describe the observed phenomena.ResultsThe results will be presented at the EPA in March 2016 in Madrid.ConclusionThe study will reveal differences in how psychiatrists and psychologists classify TCC's in PTSD.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Anis Awad

Joint custody is currently a popular and debatable issue. It is felt that some of the controversy is due to the lack of agreement on a definition. Following some examples of the differences in personal and judicial definitions of joint custody, a classification of custody is offered. Four types of custody arrangements are described: Absolute Sole Custody, Sole Custody, Non-Alternating Joint Custody (disputed and undisputed) and Alternating Joint Custody (disputed and undisputed). A critical review of the literature follows. Finally, clinical impressions about the two types of joint custody are discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-605
Author(s):  
Gérard Bouchard ◽  
Christian Pouyez ◽  
Raymond Roy

This article presents, in the first part, a critical review of the literature on this subject. In the second part, a new grid for the classification of occupations is constructed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document