scholarly journals Nomenclature of the magnetoplumbite group

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Holtstam ◽  
Ulf Hålenius

AbstractA nomenclature and classification scheme has been approved by IMA–CNMNC for the magnetoplumbite group, with the general formula A[B12]O19. The classification on the highest hierarchical level is decided by the dominant metal at the 12-coordinated A sites, at present leading to the magnetoplumbite (A = Pb), hawthorneite (A = Ba) and hibonite (A = Ca) subgroups. Two species remain ungrouped. Most cations, with valences from 2+ to 5+, show a strong order over the five crystallographic B sites present in the crystal structure, which forms the basis for the definition of different mineral species. A new mineral name, chihuahuaite, is introduced and replaces hibonite-(Fe).

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1433-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-J. Forster ◽  
M. A. Cooper ◽  
A. C. Roberts ◽  
C. J. Stanley ◽  
A. J. Criddle ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 523-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Agakhanov ◽  
L. A. Pautov ◽  
V. Y. Karpenko ◽  
E. Sokolova ◽  
F. C. Hawthorne

2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 1322-1329 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Biagioni ◽  
E. Bonaccorsi ◽  
F. Camara ◽  
M. Cadoni ◽  
M. E. Ciriotti ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1371-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Britvin ◽  
A. A. Antonov ◽  
S. V. Krivovichev ◽  
T. Armbruster ◽  
P. C. Burns ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1757-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Paar ◽  
A. C. Roberts ◽  
P. Berlepsch ◽  
T. Armbruster ◽  
D. Topa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Frank C. Hawthorne

ABSTRACT It is commonly accepted that the calculation of the proportions of endmember constituents in garnet is dependent on the particular sequence of calculating the amounts of the endmembers, and this belief has been used to justify avoiding the use of endmembers in the definition of a mineral species. Calculating the amounts of endmember constituents to represent a specific mineral formula involves the solution of a set of simultaneous equations, and hence the idea that the solution is dependent on the order in which the amounts of endmember constituent are determined conflicts with the meaning of the term “simultaneous equations”. Here I examine the data on which these conclusions are based and show that these sequence-dependent results arise because of the use of non-stoichiometric formulae that are not electroneutral. If a garnet formula is adjusted slightly such that it exactly fits the general formula of a garnet, [8]X3[6]Y2[4]Z3O12, and is electroneutral, the simultaneous equations relating its chemical formula to a set of endmember constituents have a single unique solution. Thus, the argument that has been used to justify avoiding the use of endmembers in the definition of a mineral species is specious.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document