alkaline massif
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

120
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
Nikita V. Chukanov ◽  
Natalia V. Zubkova ◽  
Igor V. Pekov ◽  
Roman Yu. Shendrik ◽  
Dmitry A. Varlamov ◽  
...  

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 934
Author(s):  
Celso de Barros Gomes ◽  
Rogério Guitarrari Azzone ◽  
Gaston Eduardo Enrich Rojas ◽  
Vincenza Guarino ◽  
Excelso Ruberti

General information is presented on ten agpaitic occurrences located in southern Brazil and at the border between Brazil and Paraguay. All the Brazilian agpaitic rocks are Late Cretaceous in age, whereas the Paraguayan ones are older than Early Triassic. The most significant occurrence is Poços de Caldas, the largest alkaline massif in South America. In general, these agpaitic rocks contain mineral assemblages that indicate presence of typical halogen-bearing Na–Ca–HFSE phases, eudialyte-, rinkite- and wöhlerite-group minerals being the most frequent ones. However, these associations are indeed more complex in terms of composition, with accessory phases in some cases consisting of various minerals, including U–Th oxides/silicates, Nb oxides, REE–Sr–Ba bearing carbonates–fluorocarbonates–phosphates–silicates and Zr–Na rich silicates. They usually form late magmatic stage to hydrothermal/deuteric assemblages linked with coarse and fine-grained, mainly silica-undersaturated evolved rocks. Data also indicate significant differences in type, amount and composition of agpaitic minerals in all investigated occurrences.


Author(s):  
Elemér Pál-Molnár ◽  
Luca Kiri ◽  
Réka Lukács ◽  
István Dunkl ◽  
Anikó Batki ◽  
...  

AbstractThe timing of Triassic magmatism of the Ditrău Alkaline Massif (Eastern Carpathians, Romania) is important for constraining the tectonic framework and emplacement context of this igneous suite during the closure of Paleotethys and coeval continental rifting, as well as formation of back-arc basins.Our latest geochronological data refine the previously reported ages ranging between 237.4 ± 9.1 and 81.3 ± 3.1 Ma. New K/Ar and U–Pb age data combined with all recently (post-1990) published ages indicate a relatively short magmatic span (between 238.6 ± 8.9 Ma and 225.3 ± 2.7 Ma; adding that the most relevant U–Pb ages scatter around ∼230 Ma) of the Ditrău Alkaline Massif. The age data complemented by corresponding palinspastic reconstructions shed light on the paleogeographic environment wherein the investigated igneous suite was formed.The magmatism of the Ditrău Alkaline Massif could be associated with an intra-plate, rift-related extensional tectonic setting at the southwestern margin of the East European Craton during the Middle–Late Triassic (Ladinian–Norian) period.


2021 ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
R. K. Rastsvetaeva ◽  
N. V. Chukanov ◽  
D. V. Lisitsin ◽  
K. V. Van ◽  
K. A. Viktorova

A potentially new mineral, M2Na-dominant analogue of eudialyte from the Khibiny alkaline massif, was investigated using the methods of electron probe microanalysis, X-ray diffraction, and IR spectroscopy. The crystal structure was refined to R = 5.7% in the anisotropic approximation of atomic displacements using 2577 independent reflections with F > 3(F). The unit-cell parameters are: a = 14.277(1), c = 30.400(1) Å, V = 5328.7(1) Å3; the space group is R-3m. The idealized formula of the mineral is (Z = 3): Na14Ca6Zr3[Na2(Fe,Mn)][Si26O72](OH)2(H2O1.0Cl0.6S2-0.5)(OH,H2O)2.5. Distribution of cations in the M2 micro-region is established: Fe in the flat-square coordination, Mn in the square pyramid and Na in the seven-vertex polyhedron. A comparative analysis of crystal chemical features of eudialyte М2Na-analogue samples from the Khibiny-Lovozero alkaline complex and Ilimaussaq alkaline pluton, Greenland is given. The mechanism of blocky isomorphism with the replacement of IVFe2+ with VIINa in the M2 micro-region is discussed. IR spectra of the М2Na-dominant eudialyte analogue are given: essentially hydrated sample (Na,H3O,H2O)15Ca6Zr3[Na2Fe][Si26O72](OH)2Cl∙2H2O from Ilimaussaq, less hydrated М2Zr-bearing sample (Na,H3O)13(Ca4Mn2)Zr3(Na2Zr)[Si26O72](OH)2Cl∙H2O from Lovozero and low-hydrated sample Na14Ca6Zr3[Na2(Fe,Mn)][Si26O72](OH)2Cl(OH,H2O)3 from Khibiny studied in this work.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Margarita Avdontceva ◽  
Sergey Krivovichev ◽  
Victor Yakovenchuk

The crystal structures of natural (Mt. Koashva, Khibiny alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russian Arctic) and synthetic (obtained from an aqueous solution of sodium phosphate and sodium fluoride (1:1) by evaporation at room temperature (RT)) natrophosphate, Na7(PO4)2F·19H2O, have been investigated using single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Natrophosphate and its synthetic analogue are cubic, Fd-3c, a = 27.6942(3) Å (natrophosphate at RT), a = 27.6241(4) Å (natrophosphate at 100 K), a = 28.1150(12) Å (synthetic analogue at RT), a = 27.9777(7) Å (synthetic analogue at 100 K). The crystal structure is based upon the super-octahedral [Na6(H2O)18F]5+ polycationic complexes consisting of six edge-linked Na6(OH2)5F octahedra sharing one common fluorine vertex. The A site is statistically occupied by Na and H2O with the prevalence of H2O with the refined occupancy factors O:Na equal to 0.53:0.47 for natrophosphate and 0.75:0.25 for its synthetic analogue. The coordination of the A site in synthetic natrophosphate is enlarged compared to the natural sample, which agrees well with its higher occupancy by H2O molecules. The general formula of natrophosphates can be written as Na6+xHxF(PO4)2·(19 + x)H2O, where x = 0–1. The chemical variability of natrophosphate allows to explain the discrepancies in its solubility reported by different authors. The information-based parameters of structural complexity are equal to 3.713 bit/atom and 2109.177 bit/cell that allows to classify natrophosphate as a structurally very complex mineral.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 764-772
Author(s):  
L. M. Lyalina ◽  
Ye. E. Savchenko ◽  
G. I. Kadyrova ◽  
E. A. Selivanova

Geochemistry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 125648
Author(s):  
Rogério Guitarrari Azzone ◽  
Luanna Chmyz ◽  
Vincenza Guarino ◽  
Adriana Alves ◽  
Celso de Barros Gomes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document