scholarly journals Pediatric Hematologist/Oncologists' Beliefs about Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Sickle Cell Transplant Advocacy and Research Alliance (STAR) Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2164-2164
Author(s):  
Emily Riehm Meier ◽  
Allistair Abraham ◽  
Alexander I. Ngwube ◽  
Isaac Janson ◽  
Gregory M.T. Guilcher ◽  
...  

Background Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides a curative therapy for children severely affected by sickle cell disease (SCD). Rejection-free survival following a matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT for these children is very high. As safer approaches are developed, using reduced intensity conditioning and improved graft versus host disease prophylaxis, there is rationale for extending MSD HSCT to less severely affected children to spare them increasing morbidity and early mortality in adulthood. Providers' perceptions may contribute to the slow adoption of MSD HSCT for less severe SCD. In this study we assess providers' perceptions about MSD HSCT for children with variable SCD severity and determine the influence of provider characteristics on HSCT attitudes. Methods Pediatric Hematologists/Oncologists (PHO) were eligible to participate in this IRB exempt study. An e-survey was distributed to all STAR members and ASH members who self-identified as PHO and posted on the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Clinical Forum listserv. Analysis was performed to describe participant demographics and the proportion of participants who practice exclusively Pediatric Hematology with a focus on SCD (PSCD) vs. general PHO; we evaluated correlations between these characteristics and likelihood of HSCT referral for each scenario. Results Of the 203 respondents, 59% were female, and 69% were between the ages of 30 and 49 years. Spearman's rank correlation analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between respondent age and likelihood to refer to HSCT for any of the survey scenarios. Two-thirds self-identified as Caucasian, 19% Asian, 7% African American and 3% Hispanic. 35% of respondents practiced general PHO, 20% PSCD, 20% Pediatric Hematology, 15% Pediatric HSCT, and 4% Hemostasis. The majority (75%) of respondents were very or somewhat likely to order HLA typing for a child with HbSS/HbSβ⁰thalassemia who had full siblings, regardless of disease severity. Only 48% would refer a child with HbSS/HbSβ⁰thalassemia who had an HLA-MSD but never admitted to the hospital; referral likelihood differed significantly by practice focus [PHO: 23% very or somewhat likely vs. 54% of PSCD (p=0.002)]. Conversely, 99% of respondents were very or somewhat likely to refer a child who suffered an overt stroke, while 85% and 84% were very or somewhat likely to refer a child who had an abnormal TCD or silent infarct, respectively. 49% of respondents were very or somewhat likely to refer a child with HbSS/HbSβ⁰thalassemia if they had a history of suboptimal adherence to hydroxyurea; referral likelihood again differed by practice focus [PHO: 35% very or somewhat likely vs. 64% PSCD (p=0.021)]. Concern about transplant related mortality (TRM) was the predominant reason for not referring. For children with severe clinical phenotypes of HbSC and HbSβ+thalassemia, 78% of respondents were very or somewhat likely to refer, compared to only 23% who would refer asymptomatic children with SCD variants. PHO and PSCD did not differ in the likelihood to refer either group. 87% of respondents were very or somewhat likely to refer a child with β-thalassemia major for MSD HSCT, regardless of disease severity; no statistically significant difference was found between PHO and PSCD in referral likelihood. A significantly higher proportion of respondents would refer an asymptomatic child with β-thalassemia major (87%) than those who were very or somewhat likely to refer an asymptomatic child with HbSS/HbSβ⁰thalassemia (47%, p<0.00001) or other SCD variants (23%, p= 0.0005). Discussion HSCT is a curative therapy for people with SCD. There was almost complete agreement that a HSCT referral should be made for children with HbSS/HbSβ⁰thalassemia and cerebral vasculopathies who have an MSD, but attitudes varied for almost every other clinical scenario posed. PSCD providers were more likely to refer asymptomatic patients and those with questionable adherence to hydroxyurea compared to general PHOs. TRM was the most common reason for not referring an asymptomatic child for MSD HSCT. Yet, TRM is low in the setting of pediatric MSD HSCT for SCD. Additional education about the decreased quality of life in aging people with SCD and their lack of improvement in life expectancy is needed so that physician perception of HSCT changes and the number of young asymptomatic children with SCD referred for MSD HSCT increases. Disclosures Meier: CVS Caremark: Consultancy. Guilcher:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: ASH 2017 meeting attendance.

Blood Reviews ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100868
Author(s):  
Emanuela Cimpeanu ◽  
Maria Poplawska ◽  
Brian Campbell Jimenez ◽  
Dibyendu Dutta ◽  
Seah H. Lim

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 861-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Nickel ◽  
Jeanne E. Hendrickson ◽  
Ann E. Haight

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is the only cure for sickle cell disease (SCD). HSCT using an HLA-identical sibling donor is currently an acceptable treatment option for children with severe SCD, with expected HSCT survival >95% and event-free survival >85%. HSCT for children with less severe SCD (children who have not yet suffered overt disease complications or only had mild problems) is controversial. It is important to consider the ethical issues of a proposed study comparing HLA-identical sibling HSCT to best supportive care for children with less severe SCD. In evaluating the principles of nonmaleficence, respect for individual autonomy, and justice, we conclude that a study of HLA-identical sibling HSCT for all children with SCD, particularly hemoglobin SS and Sβ0-thalassemia disease, is ethically sound. Future work should explore the implementation of a large trial to help determine whether HSCT is a beneficial treatment of children with less severe SCD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (09) ◽  
pp. 5024-5032
Author(s):  
Carolina Wishner ◽  
Colleen Taylor ◽  
Monica Williams ◽  
Derian Kuneman

Abstract   Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects millions of people around the world and is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality. It is a chronic, life-long illness that affects virtually every tissue in the body, worsens over time, with varying degrees of morbidity in everyone with the disease.  Before hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCST), the mainstay of the management of SCD included early identification of the disease through newborn screening, infection prophylaxis with vaccinations and antibiotics, management of pain crises, blood transfusions, and hydroxyurea.   These treatments although beneficial, do not cure SCD, stop the progressive end-organ damage associated with this disease, and are lifelong.   Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is one of two treatment options that offer a cure for SCD and stops the progressive end-organ damage. The purpose of this article is to examine traditional treatments (best medical practice) and HCST for SCD and their associated complications.  The role of HCST in the treatment of sickle cell disease, as well as recent research on HSCT as a cure for SCD, risk factors, patient selection, limitations, and future use of this treatment option, are also reviewed.  Major issues surrounding the use of HCST for treating SCD include the optimal age for transplantation, disease severity, donor source, and the conditioning regimen before transplantation. The future of HCST including gene therapy is also discussed.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Cecelia Calhoun ◽  
Ryan Colvin ◽  
Arti Verlekar ◽  
Sherry Lassa-Claxton ◽  
F. Sessions Cole ◽  
...  

Abstract Higher Prevalence of Hydroxyurea Use Is Associated with Lower Hospitalization Rate in a Population of Children with Sickle Cell Disease Cecelia L. Calhoun, MD; Ryan Colvin, MPH; Sherry Lassa-Claxton, MS; Arti Verlekar MS; F. Sessions Cole, MD; Monica L. Hulbert, MD Background Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) treated with hydroxyurea (HU) in clinical trials have had fewer hospitalizations and vaso-occlusive pain episodes than those on placebo. Since 2014, HU has been recommended for all children with Hemoglobin SS/S-β0 thalassemia, and many SCD centers have increased HU utilization. The effect of expanded HU treatment on hospitalization rate has not been reported in a population of children clinically treated with HU. In a pediatric SCD center cohort, we tested the hypothesis that increasing prevalence of HU treatment was associated with reduced hospitalization rate per patient-year and in total hospitalizations. Methods PedsNet, a PCORI-funded clinical research initiative, was queried for all patients with inpatient or outpatient encounters for SCD at St. Louis Children's Hospital (SLCH) from 2010 through 2015. Data from patients with ICD-9 codes indicating any genotype of SCD were included. Patients were considered to be receiving HU when it was prescribed on 2 or more outpatient encounters. Exclusion criteria were lack of SCD diagnosis confirmation, lack of outpatient visits at SLCH, and presence of a significant unrelated medical condition. Patients were censored at their 21st birthday or date of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Data generated at the adult hospital were excluded. All hospitalizations in the final cohort were included for analysis, regardless of diagnosis code. For comparisons, patients were grouped as having a severe genotype (SS, S-β0 thalassemia, SD) or less-severe genotype (SC, S-β+ thalassemia). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4. Logistic and Poisson regression were used to compare proportions and rates between groups, respectively. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to account for within patient correlation. Results The PedsNet query identified 646 patients. Sixty patients were excluded due to lack of SCD diagnosis, 78 due to lack of outpatient care, and 4 due to severe unrelated disease (3 with congenital disease/malformation, 1 with cancer), leaving 504 who met all inclusion criteria (51.6% male). Hematopoietic stem cell transplant was performed in 23 patients during the study period. Of patients with a severe genotype, 28 (20.1%) received HU in 2010 compared with 111 (65.6%) in 2015 (p<0.0001). Fewer patients in the less-severe genotype group received HU: 5 patients (4.3%) in 2010 and 13 (14.3%) in 2015 (p=0.006). In the severe genotype group, the rate of hospitalizations per patient-year decreased from 1.71 to 1.01 (p<0.0001) and the total number of hospitalizations decreased from 345 to 197. Throughout the study period, HU-treated patients in the severe genotype group had a higher hospitalization rate than HU-untreated patients; both treated and untreated patients had a significantly lower rate in 2015 than 2010 (Table), suggesting that hospitalizations were prevented as children who were more prone to hospitalizations began HU therapy. There was no significant change in hospitalization rate over time in the less-severe genotype group, at 1.13 hospitalizations per patient-year in 2010 and 1.16 in 2015 (p=0.94), with no impact of HU in this group. Conclusions In this clinical cohort of children with SCD, increasing prevalence of HU treatment was associated with significantly fewer total hospitalizations and a lower hospitalization rate per patient-year. The constant hospitalization rate in the less-severe genotype group suggests that the reduction is attributable to HU, rather than to other changes in clinical practice affecting patients with all genotypes. Hospitalization rates were higher among HU-treated patients, suggesting that more symptomatic children remain more likely to receive HU despite published recommendations to treat all children with severe genotypes. Families and clinicians may be reluctant to initiate HU for primary prevention of pain and hospitalizations in asymptomatic children. Future work should examine HU effects on specific SCD complications and on costs of care. Family and clinician interventions are needed to promote HU utilization in targeted patient groups. Table. Table. Disclosures Hulbert: Pfizer, Inc.: Other: spouse employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1565
Author(s):  
Santosh L. Saraf ◽  
Damiano Rondelli

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited red blood cell disorder that leads to substantial morbidity and early mortality. Acute and chronic SCD-related complications increase with older age, and therapies are urgently needed to treat adults. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative therapy, but has been used less frequently in adults compared to children. This is, in part, due to (1) greater chronic organ damage, limiting tolerability to myeloablative conditioning regimens, (2) a higher rate of HSCT-related complications in adults versus children with SCD, and (3) limited coverage by public and private health insurance. Newer approaches using nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT regimens have demonstrated better safety and tolerability, with high rates of stable engraftment in SCD adults. This review will focus on the impacts of HSCT, using more contemporary approaches to SCD-related complications in adults.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document