Clinical Usefulness and Therapeutic Plan with Interim PET/CT Analysis in Malignant Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2403-2403
Author(s):  
Deok-Hwan Yang ◽  
Je-Jung Lee ◽  
Jung-Joon Min ◽  
Se-Ryeon Lee ◽  
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract FDG-PET, a functional imaging modality used for staging and monitoring response to treatment of malignant lymphoma, has a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging. PET/CT may be more accurate than conventional imaging in assessing treatment effects to correctly identify patients with residual disease and predict therapy outcomes. We prospectively investigated that PET/CT may provide additional prognostic information in mid-response assessment prior to completion of chemotherapy. Patients and Method: Eighty-six newly diagnosed patients with malignant lymphoma were enrolled from Aug. 2004 to July 2006. Both CT and PET/CT analysis were performed at the time of diagnosis and after the 3rd or 4th chemotherapy. The clinical stage of the patients was assessed according to International Workshop Criteria (IWC). PET/CT imaging was analyzed according to the combination of morphology using the CT portion and by the uptake and location of the FDG-PET portion. The cut off value of the positive in PET/CT was more than max SUV 3.0. We divided them into four different response groups using IWC and PET/CT (CRu-negative, Cru-positive, PR-negative, PR-positive). The limited-stage patients were treated with chemotherapy and involved field radiation therapy and the advanced-stage patients were treated with eight cycles of chemotherapy. However, advanced-stage patients who were older than sixty, if they had CRu-negative in interim analysis, were treated with only six cycles. Results: Median age was 53.5 years (range: 19 – 85). Seventy five patients had Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [Indolent-11 (12.8%), Aggressive-64 (74.4%)] and eleven patients (12.8%) had Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Forty-two patients (48.8%) achieved CRu-negative, 6 patients (7.0%) achieved CRu-positive, 20 patients (23.3%) achieved PR-negative and 18 patients (20.9%) showed PR-positive by interim IWC and PET/CT. The relapse rate is significantly different between PET-positive (58.3%) and PET-negative (8.1%) (P=0.000), especially when 12 of 18 patients in PR-positive group (66.7%) relapsed after or during chemotherapy. Figures showed the Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall and progression free survival of 86 patients depending on the combined evaluation of interim IWC and PET/CT. Conclusion: Interim PET/CT analysis was a significantly predictive value of disease progression and survival. The patients with PR-positive according to interim IWC and PET/CT analysis should be considered for an intensive therapeutic plan. Figure Figure

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Herkel ◽  
A. Y. Joe ◽  
C. Altehoefer ◽  
J. Finke ◽  
E. Moser ◽  
...  

SummaryThe aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of FDG-PET and conventional imaging (CI) in a large series of patient with Hodgkin’s disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) at three time points during their course of disease. Patients, methods: 169 consecutive lymphoma patients (69 HD; 100 NHL) were included. 193 FDG-PET studies were performed for staging at baseline in 42 cases, for post-therapeutic monitoring in 103, and for diagnosis of recurrence in 48 cases. Performance indices of sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of metabolic FDG-PET and morphological CI were calculated. Differences in staging and diagnosis of residual or recurrent lymphoma were compared. Results: FDG-PET changed staging in 36% of cases for staging at baseline, in 52% of cases for monitoring response to treatment, and in 29% for diagnosis of recurrence. FDG-PET staging results were confirmed in 80% for staging at baseline, in 74% for monitoring response to treatment, and in 50% for diagnosis of recurrence. FDGPET and CI differed significantly at monitoring response to treatment for sensitivity (0.91 versus 0.69; p<0.02), specificity (0.90 versus 0.38; p<0.00001), PPV (0.77 versus 0.42; p<0.001), and accuracy (0.83 versus 0.55; p<0.02). Conclusion: FDG-PET should be considered as the diagnostic modality of choice for post-therapeutic assessment of lymphoma patients and may be a reliable alternative to CI for staging at baseline and diagnosis of recurrence.


Author(s):  
Volkan Bas ◽  
Elif Gulsum Umit ◽  
Ulku Korkmaz ◽  
Mehmet Baysal ◽  
Sedanur Karaman Gulsaran ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Martina Panebianco ◽  
Oreste Bagni ◽  
Natalia Cenfra ◽  
Sergio Mecarocci ◽  
Elettra Ortu La Barbera ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Piyush Aggarwal ◽  
Anwin Joseph Kavanal ◽  
Harmandeep Singh ◽  
Rajender Kumar ◽  
Rajeev Ranjan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 817-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
YAFU YIN ◽  
FENG QING ◽  
XUENA LI ◽  
BULIN DU ◽  
NA LI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document