FLAMSA Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in High Risk Myeloid Malignancies Is Also Feasible with Partially Mismatched Donors.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3068-3068
Author(s):  
Michael Stadler ◽  
Elke Dammann ◽  
Stefanie Buchholz ◽  
Bernd Hertenstein ◽  
Juergen Krauter ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: A conditioning regimen for HLA-identical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in relapsed, refractory, or otherwise high risk myeloid malignancies has been developed, called FLAMSA (Schmid et al.; J Clin Oncol2005; 23: 5675–5687). This protocol combines a four-day salvage chemotherapy consisting of daily fludarabine 30 mg/m2, amsacrine 100 mg/m2, and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2, followed by three days of pause, with a reduced-intensity conditioning in the subsequent week, comprising total body irradiation 4 Gy (or busulfan 8 mg/kg), cyclophosphamide 80 or 120 mg/kg and antithymocyte globulin 30 or 60 mg/kg (for related / unrelated donors, respectively). Tapering of immunosuppression until day 90 and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions for patients without GvHD are integral parts of FLAMSA. This protocol has since enjoyed widespread use due to its tolerability even in patients of older age or reduced performance, as well as its salvage effect and curative potential even in patients without remission before transplantation. However, the lack of a fully HLA-matched donor might render this last chance unsuitable. Our purpose was to compare outcome after FLAMSA with HLA-identical versus partially HLA-mismatched donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have employed the FLAMSA protocol in 90 patients between March 2004 and June 2007, of whom 69 (the ident group) had a fully HLA-matched related (8/8 loci) or unrelated (10/10 loci) donor and 21 (the nonident group) a partially HLA-mismatched donor (1 locus in sixteen patients, 2 loci in four and haplo-identical in one). Half were females and half males, with a median age of 54 years (range: 19 to 71 years). 39 had been diagnosed with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 39 with secondary AML, 11 with myelodysplasia and one with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 12 were in first and 4 in subsequent complete remission, whereas 74 were untreated, refractory or in relapse. Both the ident and the nonident groups were comparable regarding gender, age, diagnoses, cytogenetic risk group, remission status at transplant, as well as cytomegalovirus and sex match with their respective donor. RESULTS: With 9.2 months (range: 0.3 to 38.2 months) median follow-up of all patients, 11/21 (52%) nonident patients are alive and 10/21 (48%) in complete remission, as compared to 39/69 (57%) ident patients (not significant). Probabilities of overall and disease-free survival at 2.5 years after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Figure) are 43% and 35% for nonident and 45% and 41% for ident patients, respectively (p = 0.54 and p = 0.56; not significant). Treatment related mortality among nonident patients was 6/21 (29%) versus 12/69 (17%) in ident patients, whereas relapse related death occurred in 18/69 (26%) in the ident group with compared to 4/21 (19%) in the nonident group. CONCLUSION: In our single-center, retrospective comparison with limited median follow-up, both fully HLA-identical and partially HLA-mismatched donors were suitable for the FLAMSA protocol. Confirmation of this finding in a prospective study is warranted. Figure Figure

Leukemia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Wieduwilt ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Selina Luger ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
...  

AbstractOptimal post-remission therapy for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) is not established. We compared overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients receiving post-remission therapy on CALGB 10403 to a cohort undergoing myeloablative (MA) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in CR1. In univariate analysis, OS was superior with chemotherapy compared to MA allogeneic HCT (3-year OS 77% vs. 53%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, allogeneic HCT showed inferior OS (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.5–2.66, P < 0.001), inferior DFS (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25–2.12, P < 0.001), and increased NRM (HR 5.41, 95% CI 3.23–9.06, P < 0.001) compared to chemotherapy. A higher 5-year relapse incidence was seen with chemotherapy compared to allogeneic HCT (34% vs. 23%, P = 0.011). Obesity was independently associated with inferior OS (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.63–2.89, P < 0.001), inferior DFS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.51–2.57, P < 0.001), increased relapse (1.84, 95% CI 1.31–2.59, P < 0.001), and increased NRM (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.37–3.23, P < 0.001). For AYA ALL patients in CR1, post-remission therapy with pediatric-style chemotherapy is superior to MA allogeneic HCT for OS, DFS, and NRM.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4680-4680
Author(s):  
Sara Lozano Cerrada ◽  
David Marin ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
Celina Ledesma ◽  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Treatment outcomes for adult patients with relapsed ALL are limited. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative option in a small subset of patients. We sought to investigate the optimal extent of therapy required prior to proceeding to transplant in second complete remission (CR2). Methods 126 consecutive patients with ALL in CR2 underwent HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2004 to December 2015. The patient and transplant characteristics are described in table 1. The probabilities of outcomes were calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer method. Variables found to be significant at the p<0.1 level were included in a Cox regression multivariate model. Relative risks (RR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All p values are two sided. Results Median follow-up was 38.4 months (range 6-125). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) were 34.6%, 29.5% and 33.2%, respectively. Eighty-three patients received at least one course of chemotherapy after achieving CR2 (median 2, range 1-6). These patients had significantly better OS, PFS and relapse rate than the 34 patients that went to transplant immediately after achieving CR2. Namely, 43.8% vs 7.6% (p=0.002), 39.4% vs. 5.1% (p=0.002) and 37.9% vs. 89.5% (p<0.001), respectively. Both groups had comparable TRM (Table 1). Interestingly, these differences were independent of the patient's minimal residual disease (MRD) status prior to transplant (Figure 1). Similar results were found when we limited the analysis to the 96 patients who achieved CR2 with the first line of salvage therapy. OS in this group was 46.0% vs. 9.4% (p=0.009) for patients who required additional lines of salvage chemotherapy to achieve CR2. Patient's age, performance status, comorbidity index and graft source were also predictive for outcome. In multivariate analysis receiving at least one additional course of chemotherapy after achieving CR2 (RR=0.53, CI=0.31-0.91, p=0.02), age>45 (RR=2.06, CI=1.20-3.53, p=0.009), alternative graft sources (RR=1.81, CI=1.09-2.97, p=0.02) and Karnofsky <90% (RR=1.68, CI=1.01-2.79, p=0.04) were independent predictors for OS. Receiving at least one additional course of chemotherapy after achieving CR2 (RR=0.52, CI=0.31-0.87, p=0.01), age>45 (RR=1.92, CI=1.15-3.20, p=0.01) and Karnofsky <90% (RR=1.86, CI=1.14-3.03, p=0.01) were independent predictors for PFS. Conclusion: The outcome of patients with relapsed ALL who proceed to HCT immediately after achieving CR2 is dismal. Our data supports the notion that patients should receive at least one additional course of treatment after achieving CR2 prior to transplantation, regardless of MRD status. However, our observations must be interpreted with caution as this was not an intent to treat analysis so we could not adjust for loss of patients prior transplantation. Further analysis on an intent to treat basis is underway. Disclosures Ciurea: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Cyto-Sen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Jabbour:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy. Kantarjian:BMS, Pfizer, Amgen, Novartis: Research Funding. Champlin:Intrexon: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Ziopharm Oncology: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document