The Combination of Bortezomib and Rituximab Is Effective and Safe in Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non Follicular and Mantle-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Phase II Multicenter Study by Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3758-3758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Chiappella ◽  
Patrizia Pregno ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Fabio Facchetti ◽  
Andrea Evangelista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 3758 Poster Board III-694 Introduction The combination of Bortezomib (B) and Rituximab (R) has been shown in vitro synergistic apoptosis and enhanced NFkB depletion in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) and Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) cells. Rituximab in combination with Bortezomib is well tolerated without overlapping toxicities. Our study was aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the association of Rituximab and Bortezomib in relapsed/refractory indolent non follicular and mantle cell lymphoma patients not eligible to high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. The study was designed according to Simon's two stage Optimal Design and the primary endpoint was the achievement of an Overall Response Rate (ORR) > 40%. Patients and methods From September 2006 to March 2008, 54 patients were enrolled into the study. Histology was centrally reviewed in all cases: 49 diagnosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were evaluable for the analysis. Clinical characteristics were as follows: 28 males and 21 females; median age 68 years (range 50-74); 16 lymphocytic/lymphoplasmacytic (LL), 8 MZL and 25 MCL; seven stage I-II disease, nine III and 33 IV; 33 were BM positive; according to IPI 36 patients were at low-intermediate risk and 18 at intermediate-high/high risk; 11 patients had 1 and 38 > 2 prior lines of chemotherapy; 15 were R-naïve patients and 34 R-pretreated, 21 patients had refractory disease (<1 yr from the last therapy) and 28 were in relapse (> 1 yr). The treatment plan was: one course of 4 weekly doses of Rituximab (375 mg/sqm) and Bortezomib (1.6 mg/sqm IV bolus) followed by 2 courses of 4 weekly IV bolus of B (1.6 mg/sqm) as single agent. Responding (CR+ PR) and stable disease patients were planned to be given three further courses with the same schedule. Results ORR was 26/49 (53%). Responses were as follows: 13 CR (26.5%) and 13 PR (26.5%). ORR by histology was: 6/16 (37.5%) in LL, 4/8 (50%) in MZL and 16/25 (64%) in MCL respectively. Pretreatment with Rituximab did not adversely affect the ORR: 21/34 (62%) in R-pretreated patients and 5/15 (33%) in R-naïve patients (p .06). ORR was higher in relapsed patients compared with refractory ones: 18/28 (64%) and 8/21 (38%) (p .06). With a median follow-up of one year, Overall Survival (OS) was 93% (95%CI: 79.7-97.9) and 1-year Progression free survival (PFS) was 45% (95%CI: 30-59) (Figure 1). A total of 233 courses were delivered with a median of 4.7 courses per patient. Twenty-eight patients completed the treatment plan and 21 were withdrawn from the study because of: 17 PD during treatment and 4 AE (1 concomitant gastric neoplasia, 1 neurotoxicity grade II, 1 pleural effusion and 1 toxic death due to interstitial pneumonia). Grade 3-4 CTC haematological toxicity was rare with neutropenia in 5% of the courses and thrombocytopenia in <2%. Grade 3-4 CTC cumulative non hematological toxicity was observed in 4.7% of all courses delivered. The most frequent of these were: neurotoxicity grade II in 13 patients and grade III in 5, with complete recover or return to grade I in all of them but one; infections were detected in 3 patients (pneumonia), constipation grade III in 2 and diarrhoea grade > III in 5. Conclusions This study suggests that the combination of Rituximab and Bortezomib is feasible and effective in relapsed/refractory indolent non follicular lymphoma and MCL. This treatment combination is a good therapeutic option without chemotherapy mainly in MCL and MZL also in Rituximab pretreated patients. Our data suggest a promising PFS in this subset of heavily pretreated patients. The combination of Rituximab plus Bortezomib should be explored in further and larger studies. Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche: lecture fees. Off Label Use: Bortezomib was provided free by Jansen-Cilag who gave a research grant to support the study.

Mature Results From ECOG Study E1405 – A Phase II Study of VcR-CVAD with Maintenance Rituximab for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 153-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Hailun Li ◽  
Mitchell R Smith ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
David T. Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Group Setting ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 153 Introduction Modified R-hyperCVAD is a well-tolerated induction regimen with a high response rate in MCL. We hypothesized that the incorporation of bortezomib (Velcadea) into this regimen would enhance the complete response rates. We further hypothesized that the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) would improve remission duration. The new regimen, VcR-CVAD with MR, was tested for safety and efficacy in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Methods Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, previously untreated MCL, PS 0–2, and adequate end organ function. The treatment plan included: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 4, rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV over 3 hrs q 12 hrs × 6 doses days 1–3, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hrs days 1–2, vincristine 1 mg IV day 3, dexamethasone 40 mg po days 1–4. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles and all patients received G-CSF support. Patients achieving SD, PR, or CR received MR administered as 4 weekly treatments every 6 months for 2 years (protocol therapy). Patients could elect to receive high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) off protocol rather than MR. The primary endpoint of the trial was the CR rate, defined as PET-negative, marrow-negative, to VcR-CVAD induction therapy. Results Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled between 5/07 and 10/08. Baseline characteristics include median age 62 (40–76), 58M:17F, 92% stage III/IV, and 40% with elevated LDH. MIPI risk distribution included 37% low, 36% intermediate, 19% high, 8% unknown. Sixty-eight patients (91%) completed VcR-CVAD induction therapy. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included PD (1), toxicity (4), and patient preference (2). The ORR was 97% (73/75), CR rate 68% (51/75) and PR rate 29% (22/75). Of the 22 PR patients, 11 were so coded due to no bone marrow evaluation and/or PET imaging post therapy. The CR rate in the 64 completely restaged patients was 80%. Forty-four patients proceeded to protocol planned MR while 22 patients received SCT consolidation off protocol. With a median follow up of 3.6 years, the 3-yr PFS for the MR cohort (n = 44) and entire cohort (n = 75) are 73% and 74%, respectively. OS at 3-yrs is 88%, with no difference between MR and SCT patients. The major toxicity of the induction treatment regimen was expected myelosuppression. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities were rare. No patients developed grade 3–4 neuropathy. There were no serious toxicities during MR. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion The VcR-CVAD induction produced high overall OR (97%) and CR rates (68%) in a representative MCL patient population treated in a cooperative group setting. The 3-yr PFS (74%) and OS (88%) are highly encouraging. Remissions in patients receiving MR were as durable as patients receiving SCT consolidation. The value of bortezomib, when added to conventional chemotherapy, is currently being tested in a randomized intergroup trial (E1411). Disclosures: Kahl: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib as frontline treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Smith:Millennium: Research Funding. Advani:Genentech: Research Funding. Horning:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership.

Preliminary Results of a Phase I/II Study of Weekly or Twice Weekly Bortezomib in Combination with Rituximab, in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Waldenström’s Macroglobulinaemia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2559-2559 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Agathocleous ◽  
S. Rule ◽  
P. Johnson ◽  
J.A. Radford ◽  
N. Lafon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab (R) is an integral component of therapy for B-cell lymphoid malignancies; bortezomib (Btz) has shown provocative single agent activity in Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) and Waldenström’s Macroglobulinaemia (WM), providing the rationale for investigating the combination. Patients+Methods: Forty-five adult patients (pts.) (30 men, 15 women) with histologically confirmed recurrent CD20+ve FL, MCL or WM, median age 60 years (range 45-79), FL: 17, MCL: 18, WM: 10, stage III/IV 40 (93%), bone marrow (BM) infiltration 32 (73%), elevated LDH 22 (49%), performance status ≥1 22 (49%), were enrolled in a randomised trial comparing 2 schedules of Brz+R: Arm A (twice weekly) Btz: 1.3mg/m2 (on days 1, 4, 8, 11 of a 21-day cycle) and R: 375mg/m2 (on day 1) for 8 cycles, or Arm B (weekly) Btz: 1.6mg/m2 (on days 1, 8, 15, 22 of a 35-day cycle) and R: 375mg/m2 (on days 1, 8, 15, 22 of cycles 1 and 4) for 6 cycles (23 arm A, 22 arm B). The median number of previous treatments was 2 (range 1-7). Seventeen pts. had received a R-containing regimen, with response lasting &gt;6 months, and 8 high-dose treatment. Response was evaluated using the IWR criteria (Cheson et al, JCO17: 1244, 1999) and the updated response criteria from the 3rd International Workshop on WM (Treon et al, Blood107: 3442, 2006) Results: Ability to deliver the therapy, toxicity and efficacy were equivalent in both arms. The median number of cycles given in arm A was 4 and 5 in arm B. Haematological toxicity (grade≥3: anaemia 0%, neutropenia 25%, thrombocytopenia 22%) was significantly influenced by the high percentage of pts. with BM infiltration and concomitant cytopenia on entry to the trial. The most common non-haematological adverse events were fatigue (76%), nausea (56%), diarrhoea (56%), lethargy (46%). Neurotoxicity occurred in 19 pts. (46%) (10 pts. grade 1, 7 pts. grade 2, 2 pts. grade 3). Btz dose was reduced in 7 pts.; 5 doses were omitted because of neuro or haematological toxicity. In 16 pts., treatment was delayed by 1-14 days and in 24 pts. treatment was stopped prematurely. The reasons for stopping treatment were: treatment-related toxicity 11 pts., progressive disease 9 pts., patient’s preference 3 pts., myocardial infarction 1 pt. One pt. was excluded having been found ineligible post randomisation. Thirty-nine pts. (21 arm A, 18 arm B) are evaluable for response so far, one having only received 1 cycle of therapy, which had to be discontinued because of excessive toxicity. 15/32 were in remission (CR, CRu, PR) at the completion of therapy, 7/7 at “mid-therapy” assessment, and 5 have yet to be evaluated. Thus the overall response rate (RR) presently is 22/39 (56%) (CR, CRu, PR), FL 44%, MCL 46%, WM 90%. Conclusions: The combination was active in pts. with recurrent NHL especially WM (RR 90%), despite multiple previous treatments, The weekly schedule is preferable being more convenient, as efficacious and no more toxic. Further investigation is warranted, despite not insignificant therapy compromising toxicity.

Anti-Tumor Activity of Single-Agent CCI-779 for Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II Trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 129-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Witzig ◽  
Susan Geyer ◽  
Irene Ghobrial ◽  
David Inwards ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Purpose: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is characterized by a t(11;14) resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1, a member of the phosphatidylinosital 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway. This study tested whether CCI-779, which inhibits the PI3K pathway at the level of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) could produce tumor responses in patients (pts) with MCL. Patients and Methods: Eligible pts had biopsy-proven, cyclin D1 positive MCL and had relapsed or were refractory to therapy. Pts received CCI-779 250 mg IV every week as a single agent. Pts were re-staged after 1 cycle (4 doses) and every 3 cycles thereafter. Pts with a tumor response after 6 cycles were eligible to continue drug for a total of 12 cycles or 2 cycles after complete remission (CR) and then were observed. Results: Thirty-five pts were enrolled and evaluable for toxicity; 1 patient had MCL by histology but was cyclin D1 negative and ineligible for efficacy evaluation. The median age was 70 years (range, 38–89), 91% were stage 4, and 69% had ≥ 2 extranodal sites. Pts had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–11) and 54% were refractory to their last treatment. The overall response rate was 38% (13/34) with 1 CR (3%) and 12 PRs (35%), surpassing the pre-defined criteria for a promising agent. Responses tended to occur rapidly with median time to response of 1 month (range, 1–8). To date, 26 patients have progressed, with a median time-to-progression of 6.8 months (95% CI: 3.8 – 9.7). Median duration of response for the 13 responders was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.2 – 13.2). Overall, 32 out of 35 patients who received treatment had grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The most common toxicities were hematologic with grade 3 (n=24) or grade 4 (n=4). Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity (n=25) and the largest cause of dose-reductions, although counts typically recovered within one week. Only 4 patients could tolerate sustained 250 mg per week throughout their treatment (including one who went on to alternate treatment after 1 cycle) and the median dose/month was 175 mg. Conclusions: Single-agent CCI-779 has substantial anti-tumor activity in relapsed MCL. This study demonstrates that agents, which selectively target cellular pathways dysregulated in MCL cells can produce therapeutic benefit. The high response rate warrants further studies of this agent in MCL, but the high incidence of hematologic toxicity suggests that a lower dose should be explored. CCI-779 at 25mg is currently being evaluated in MCL through an NCCTG trial

Alternating Courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP Plus Rituximab Followed by a High Dose ARA-C Containing Myeloablative Regimen and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Is Superior to 6 Courses CHOP Plus Rituximab Followed by Myeloablative Radiochemotherapy and ASCT In Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results of the MCL Younger Trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (MCL net)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Hermine ◽  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Nicole Brousse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 110 Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) has been characterized by poor long term prognosis with a median survival of only 3 to 4 years. However, outcome has improved during the last decades. In its first randomized trial, the MCL net demonstrated that myeloablative consolidation followed by ASCT resulted in a significant prolongation of PFS in advanced stage MCL (Dreyling et al Blood 2005). Recent phase II studies suggested that the addition of rituximab to CHOP like chemotherapy and/or high dose ARA-C may significantly improve remission rates and PFS. A French phase II trial using sequential R-CHOP/R-DHAP followed by ASCT showed an overall response rate of 95% with a CR rate of 61% translating into a median EFS of 83 months and a 75% survival rate at 5 years (Delarue et al ASH 2008). Methods: To evaluate the potential superiority of a high dose ARA-C containing regimen, the MCL net initiated a randomized trial comparing 6 courses of CHOP plus Rituximab followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy (12 Gray TBI, 2×60mg/kg Cyclophosphamide) and ASCT (control arm A) versus alternating courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP plus Rituximab followed by a high dose ARA-C containing myeloablative regimen (10 Gray TBI, 4×1,5 g/m2 Ara-C, 140mg/m2 melphalan) and ASCT (experimental arm B). Patient eligibility criteria included previously untreated MCL stage II-IV up to the age of 65 years. Histological diagnosis was confirmed by a central pathology review board. The primary end point time to treatment failure (TTF) was monitored continuously by a sequential procedure based on a one sided triangular test. Stable disease after induction, progression or death from any causes, were considered as treatment failure. Sample size was calculated to detect a hazard ratio of 52% for arm B with a power of 95%. Randomization was stopped as soon as a significant difference was observed between the two arms. Results: From July 2004 to May 2010, 497 patients were randomized in 4 countries (Germany, France, Poland, Belgium). The 391 patients evaluable for the primary analysis (19 no MCL, 87 not yet documented) displayed similar characteristics in both treatment arms: median age 55 vs 56 years, male 78% vs 79%, stage IV 85% vs 79%, B symptoms 43% vs 33%, ECOG >2 5% vs 5%, elevated LDH 37% vs 38%, and MIPI low/int/high risk 61%/25%/14% vs 62%/23%/15%, respectively. After induction overall response was similarly high in both arms (A: 90% vs B: 94%; p=0.19) and CR rate and combined CR/CRu rate were significantly higher in arm B (26% vs 39%; p=0.012 and 41% vs 60%; p=0.0003). The number of patients transplanted was similar in both arms (72% vs 73%) and after transplantation overall response and CR rates were comparable in both arms (97% vs 97% and 63% vs 65%, respectively). After a median follow up of 27 months, patients in arm B experienced a significantly longer TTF (49 months vs NR; p=0.0384, hazard ratio 0.68) mainly due to a lower number of relapses after CR/CRu/PR (20% vs 10%), whereas the rate of ASCT-related deaths in remission was similar in both arms (3% vs 4%). Although CR rate after ASCT was comparable in both arms, remission duration (RD) after ASCT was superior in Arm B (48m vs NR; p=0.047). Interestingly, for patients in CR after ASCT, RD after ASCT was also presumably superior in arm B (51 months vs NR; p=0.077). At the time of analysis overall survival was similar in both arms with medians not reached and 79% vs. 80% survival rates at 3 years (p=0.74). Safety after induction was comparable in both arms except for an increased grade 3/4 hematological toxicity (Hb 8% vs 28%, WBC 48% vs 75%, platelets 9% vs 74%, respectively), an excess of renal toxicity (creatinine grade 1/2: 8% vs 38%, grade 3/4: none vs 2%), and more frequent grade 1/2 nausea and vomiting in arm B. Toxicities of both conditioning regimen were similar, except for higher grade 3/4 mucositis (43% vs. 61%) in Arm B, and higher grade 1/2 liver toxicity and constipation in Arm A. Conclusions: High dose ARA-C in addition to R-CHOP+ASCT increases significantly complete response rates and TTF without clinically relevant increase of toxicity. Therefore, induction regimen containing high dose ARA-C followed by ASCT should become the new standard of care of MCL patients up to 65 years. Disclosures: Walewski: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stilgenbauer:Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Feugier:roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bosly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 150-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Kristie Blum ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Single-agent ibrutinib confers a response rate of 77%, including a complete response (CR) rate of 19% in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months and 1-year response duration (RD) rate of 69%, nearly half of all patients experience treatment failure during the first year. We previously demonstrated that prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the oral, specific CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can overcome ibrutinib resistance in primary human samples and MCL cell lines with wild-type BTK (Chiron et al. Cancer Discovery 2014). We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of palbociclib plus ibrutinib in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. Methods Adult patients who were ibrutinib and CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve who had previously treated MCL were eligible to participate. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Consenting patients were enrolled to one of five dose levels, shown in Table 1. Patients were treated in 28 day cycles, with ibrutinib administered daily and palbociclib administered on days 1-21. (Table 1). Patients could continue to receive study treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Doses were escalated according to a standard phase I 3+3 design. Patients were evaluated for efficacy at the end of cycles 3 and 6, and every 6 cycles thereafter. All CRs, as documented by CT, required confirmation by PET/CT; bone marrow biopsy and endoscopy were also required in patients with known marrow or GI tract involvement, respectively. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics and evaluation of pretreatment samples for biomarkers of response or resistance. Results From August 2014 to June 2016 a total of 20 patients (15 males, 5 females) were enrolled (DL1 n=3, DL2 n=3, DL3 n=6, DL4 n=3, DL5 n=5). The patients' MIPI risk distribution were 7 low, 7 intermediate, and 6 high. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-5). Six patients were refractory to their last prior therapy. Three patients experienced dose limiting toxicity: One patient treated at DL3 experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 days, and grade 3 rash was seen in two patients at DL5. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity included thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (22%), and lymphopenia (17%). Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity regardless of attribution included one patient with each of the following: lung infection, ALT/AST increase, encephalitis, hyponatremia, sinus tachycardia, pneumonitis. Grade 1-2 adverse events related to treatment and occurring in at least 2 patients included the following: diarrhea (50%), fatigue (44%), rash (39%), bruising (17%), nausea (17%), fever (11%), dyspepsia (11%), and myalgia (11%). Other than the two patients that experienced grade 3 rash at DL5, no patients have required dose reductions; 6 patients required dose interruptions. Thirteen subjects continue on study therapy. The reasons for stopping treatment were disease progression (n=4), adverse event (elevated liver enzymes, n=1; and prolonged cytopenias, n=1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n=1). Of the 18 patients that have had at least one response evaluation to date, 12 (67%) patients responded to treatment and 8 (44%) achieved a CR. The median time to CR was 3 cycles and no responding patients have progressed on study. With a median follow up of 11 months, the estimated 1-year PFS and RD are 68% and 100%, respectively (Figure 1). Conclusions The mechanism-based combination of ibrutinib plus palbociclib is well tolerated and active. Toxicity is primarily related to myelosuppression of grade 1-2 severity, although grade 3 rash was observed at the highest doses evaluated. In this small group of patients, the combination produced responses at all dose levels, with a CR rate of 44% and a median time to CR of 3 months. No responding patients have progressed to date. These preliminary CR, PFS, and RD rates appear better than those reported in other studies of single-agent ibrutinib although the numbers of patients was very small. A phase II multi-center clinical trial to evaluate time to progression is planned. Biomarker studies to evaluate mechanisms of primary resistance are ongoing. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Novartis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding.

Phase II: Combination of cladribine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, rituximab (R-CCM) in patients with relapsed and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphoma, results of a prospective study at Kitasato University

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18542-18542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
M. Danbara ◽  
M. Hayama ◽  
T. Togano ◽  
M. Ohsaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hemorrhagic Cystitis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade Iii

18542 Background: Indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (I-NHL) account for 20% of all of NHL in Japan, and they are increasing in number. More than 80% of the patients who achieve a complete remission with the initial treatment, will require salvage therapy. Recently, cladribine (2-CdA), a purine analogue is receiving much attention, because, even as a single agent, it has shown a high efficacy for I-NHL. The aim of our study was to determine the effectiveness and toxicity of combined chemotherapy consisting of 2-CdA, cyclophosphamide (CYP), mitoxantrone (MIT), rituximab (R-CCM) in the treatment of refractory or relapsed I-NHL. Methods: Patient eligibility criteria were: Previously treated patients with I-NHL, refractory or relapsed disease, no chemotherapy or irradiation within 4 weeks prior to the study, life expectancy of at least 3 months, age: 20–75, perfomance status of 0–3, adequate function ( bone marrow, liver, kidney, lung, heart) and written informed consent. The treatment regimen was: 2-CdA given at a dose of 0.09 mg/kg/day in a 2-h intravenous infusion from day 2–4, CYP 200 mg/m2/day from day 2–4, MIT 8 mg/m2/day on day 2 and rituximab 375 mg/m2/day on day .Primary end point was overall response rate. Results: 9 patients were enrolled, 7 (2 with mantle cell lymphoma, MCL; and 5 with follicular lymphoma, FL) were eligible. Mean Age was 63(51–72). The mean observation time was 121 days(47–314). Overall response rate (complete and partial) just after this therapy was 85.7%, one was progressive disease. One of PR one relapsed and died ten months after this regimen. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade-III and -IV neutropenia was seen in 7 patients, grade-III thrombocytopenia in one and grade-III hemorrhagic cystitis in one, but all of them recovered from these toxicity. After the treatment, Grade-IV pneumonia and grade-III left-ventricular diastolic dysfunction was seen in the PD patient and passed away. Conclusions: the R-CCM is effective and safe in a combined regimen for relapsed and refractory I-NHL patients. We have just begun this new regimen, therefore, further investigations with larger population are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Flavopiridol, Fludarabine and Rituximab Is a Highly Active Regimen in Indolent B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders Including Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 944-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Beth Fischer ◽  
Mollie E. Moran ◽  
Maureen M. Buckner ◽  
Roshini Shank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol was inactive when given by 24–72-hr infusion, but 1-hr IV bolus dosing demonstrated clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Flavopiridol induces apoptosis independent of p53 and may be able to eliminate tumor cells resistant to fludarabine and rituximab. We performed a phase I dose escalation study of flavopiridol in combination with fludarabine and rituximab (FFR) in patients (pts) with MCL, CLL and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Pts had ANC ≥ 1500, hemoglobin ≥ 9.0, platelets ≥ 100,000, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status 0–2, and provided informed consent. Pts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1–5 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. The planned dose escalation of flavopiridol was 50 mg/m2 by 1-hr IV bolus on day 1 (cohort 1), day 1–2 (cohort 2), or day 1–3 (cohort 3) of each cycle. Pts were placed on prophylactic Bactrim and Valtrex. Growth factor support was prohibited. Twenty-one pts were enrolled and are evaluable for toxicity and response. Median age was 62 years (range, 43–81), and 10 pts were male. Pts had the following diagnoses: CLL (8), MCL (5), follicular lymphoma (FL; 4), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL; 3), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Nine pts had received 1-2 prior therapies; 12 pts were previously untreated. CLL pts were Rai stage III/IV (5) or required treatment for Rai stage I/II disease (3) by NCI 96 criteria. NHL pts were stage III/IV (10) or had progressive stage II disease (3). Three pts were treated in cohort 1, and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed. Six pts were treated in cohort 2. Two pts developed DLT; 1 pt developed grade 3 confusion and grade 3 seizures, and 1 pt developed nausea and diarrhea resulting in grade 3 acute renal failure. Three pts in cohort 2 did not receive flavopiridol after cycles 2, 2 and 3, due to life threatening tumor lysis in our single agent flavopiridol study. Twelve additional pts were enrolled at the cohort 1 dose level, to better define toxicity and efficacy. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–6), and 9 of 21 pts completed all 6 planned cycles. Therapy was stopped early due to cytopenias (7), infection (2), DLT (2) or progressive disease (1). One patient who received only 2 cycles of FFR due to cytopenias subsequently received 4 cycles of fludarabine and rituximab from his local oncologist. Response was graded by NCI 96 criteria (CLL) or IWG criteria (NHL). Overall response rate (ORR) was 90%; 15 pts achieved CR (71%), and 4 pts achieved PR (19%). Six pts relapsed a median of 7.5 months (range 4–18) after completing therapy; 13 pts remain in remission a median of 11 months (range 4–23) after completing therapy. Of note, all 9 MCL/FL pts responded (8 CR, 1 PR), and 8 pts remain in remission a median of 15 months (6–23) after finishing therapy. In conclusion, FFR exhibited significant clinical activity in a small group of pts, but cytopenias limited the administration of therapy. We are currently studying a modified FFR regimen administering a more active flavopiridol schedule (30-min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion) and allowing the use of prophylactic filgrastim, prior to phase II clinical study.

Flavopiridol, Fludarabine and Rituximab (FFR): An Active Regimen in Indolent B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders and Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1571-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Beth Fischer ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Eric H. Kraut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol (alvocidib) induces p53-independent apoptosis and may be able to eliminate tumor cells resistant to fludarabine and rituximab. Study Design and Treatment: We report final results of a phase I dose escalation study of flavopiridol in combination with fludarabine and rituximab (FFR) in patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Pts had ANC 3 1500, hemoglobin 3 9.0, platelets 3 100,000, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status 0–2, and provided informed consent. Pts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1–5 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. Flavopiridol was administered 50 mg/m2 by 1-hr IV bolus on day 1 (cohort 1, n=15) or day 1 and 2 (cohort 2, n=6) of each cycle. Based on promising results with a novel single agent dosing schedule in CLL, the study was amended to give flavopiridol by 30-min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion at a dose of 20 mg/m2 + 20 mg/m2 (cohort 3, n=3) or 30 mg/m2 + 30 mg/m2 (cohort 4, n=14) beginning with cycle 2. Pts were placed on prophylactic Bactrim and Valtrex. Growth factor support was allowed in cohorts 3 and 4. Results: Thirty-eight pts were enrolled. Median age was 62 years (range, 38–81), and 22 pts were male (58%). Pts had CLL (11), MCL (10), follicular (FL, 9), small lymphocytic (3), marginal zone (4) or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Sixteen pts had received 1 or 2 prior therapies; 22 pts were previously untreated. Two of 6 pts in cohort 2 developed dose limiting toxicity; 1 pt developed grade 3 confusion and grade 3 seizures, and 1 pt developed nausea and diarrhea resulting in grade 3 acute renal failure. Fifteen pts were enrolled in cohort 1 and 14 pts were enrolled in cohort 4, to better define toxicity and efficacy. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–6), and 16 of 38 pts completed all 6 planned cycles. Cytopenias (10), fatigue (3), fever (2) and progression (2) were the most common reasons for early discontinuation of therapy. Response was graded by NCI 96 criteria (CLL) or IWG criteria (NHL). Overall response rate (ORR) was 82% (CR 50%, CRu 5%, PR 26%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) of responders was 25.5 months. ORR (82% vs. 81%), CR (50% vs. 50%) and median PFS (25.7 vs. 25.1 months) were similar for previously untreated and relapsed pts. Thirteen pts remain in remission with a median PFS of 33.5 months (range, 17.5–59.5), and 3 other pts died of unrelated causes. Eight of 10 MCL pts (median age 68, range 62–81) responded (7 CR, 1 PR). Two responders with blastoid variant MCL relapsed within 1 year, but median PFS of the other 6 responding MCL pts was 33.5 months. All 9 FL pts responded (5 CR, 2 CRu, 2 PR) with a median PFS of 25.1 months (range, 4.0–46.3). Conclusions: FFR exhibited significant clinical activity in indolent B-NHL, MCL and CLL. FFR was effective in both relapsed and previously untreated pts and showed promising clinical activity in older MCL pts. Changing from 1-hr IV bolus dosing to 30- min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion did not improve the response rate, suggesting that 1-hr IV bolus dosing may be effective when flavopiridol is given as part of combination chemotherapy. This regimen warrants further study.

Fludarabine, Aracytine and Rituximab Based Chemotherapy In Patients with Refractory and Relapsed Mantle Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4892-4892
Author(s):  
Tommasina Perrone ◽  
Francesco Gaudio ◽  
Annamaria Giordano ◽  
Paola Curci ◽  
Alessandro Spina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Abstract 4892 Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct B cell non Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by CD 5 expression, t (11; 14)(q13; q32) translocation and over-expression of Cyclin D1, and frequently has an aggressive clinical course. There is no standard of care for the treatment of MCL. Current treatment approaches are non curative and pts median survival is 4–6 years. Various studies have reported promising results for a high dose Cytarabine-containing regimen in the treatment of MCL. Fludarabine has also been recognized as effective treatment in pts with MCL, either as a single agent or in combination with other drugs. The addition of Rituximab improves the response to the treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of Fludarabine, Aracytine and Rituximab treatment in refractory and relapsed MCL. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 20 pts with refractory or relapsed MCL treated in our institution between February 2007 and February 2010. Median age was 59 yrs (54-77 yrs), 14 pts (70%) were males, 18 pts (90 %) had stage IV, 16 pts (80%) had bone marrow involvement, 16 (80%) presented comorbidities. Eight pts (40%) were in first relapse, 12 (60%) in second relapse. Twelve pts (60%) had a “Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index” (MIPI) score ≥ 7. Therapy included: fludarabine 25 mg/m2/daily intravenously for 3 days, aracytine 500 mg/m2/daily for 3 days and Rituximab 375 mg/m2/daily for 1 day, Dexamethasone 8 mg daily for 3 days, every 28 days for 4 cycles. Results Eight pts (40%) achieved complete response (CR) and 4 pts (20%) a Partial Remission (PR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 60%. Eight pts (40%) progressed and one of them died of active disease. After a median follow up of 17 months (range 8–36), OS is 70% and PFS is 55%. Toxicity was mainly hematological with grade >=3 neutropenia in 40 (50%) of the 80 cycles performed, grade >=2 anemia in 30 (37%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 24 (30%). In 16 (20%) cycles pts required red blood cells transfusions, in 12 (15%) platelet transfusions. One episode of Herpes Zoster infection was observed. Conclusions This study suggests that the combination of Fludarabine, Aracytine and Rituximab appears to be an effective regimen with a promising response rate and manageable toxicity, for pretreated pts often affected by comorbidities and with poor prognosis. Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this combination therapy and to further test the role of this approach in MCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Phase 1 Trial of the Pan Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070) in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2569-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Goy ◽  
Peggy Ford ◽  
Tatyana Feldman ◽  
Andrew Pecora ◽  
Stuart Goldberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dosage Group ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Obatoclax is a small molecule inhibitor of all members of the bcl-2 family of prosurvival proteins which mimics the BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins of the bcl-2 family. By binding to a hydrophobic groove on the prosurvival bcl-2 proteins (such as bcl-2 and mcl-1), obatoclax releases bax and bak and induces apoptosis. Obatoclax has clinical activity in CLL (O’Brien et al, ASH 2005) with a recommended phase II dose of 28 mg/m2 given over 3 h every 3 weeks with DLT of grade 3 infusional CNS toxicities. Similar toxicities with weekly dosing led to an MTD of 20 mg/m2 weekly (Firozvi et al, ASCO2006). Bortezomib has been shown to be an effective agent in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) but increases levels of mcl-1, a bcl-2 prosurvival family member. Obatoclax inhibits mcl-1, and in vitro data indicate synergy between obatoclax and bortezomib in MCL cell lines and patient samples (Blood109:4441, 2007). We have completed an ascending dose study evaluating the combination of obatoclax (3 hour IV infusion) and bortezomib (IV push) in patients with MCL. Both obatoclax and bortezomib were administered on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 of 21 day cycles, and up to 8 cycles were administered. Three patients received 30 mg of obatoclax and 1.0 mg/m2 of bortezomib, 3 received 30 mg of obatoclax and 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib, and 6 received 45 mg of obatoclax and 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib, which was the highest dose evaluated. Efficacy evaluation was performed every 2 cycles, approximately every 6 weeks. Median age was 67 (range 44 – 81), with 7 males. All patients had prior anthracyclines and rituximab, and 5 had previously received bortezomib. In preliminary data on the first 9 patients, adverse events with an overall incidence of ≥25% were thrombocytopenia, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, weight loss, dehydration, neuropathy, somnolence, euphoric mood, cough, and rash. The most common grade 3 and grade 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (22.2%). Somnolence and euphoric mood resolved soon after the infusion ended. There were no grade 3 or 4 infusional CNS toxicities. Obatoclax 45 mg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was determined to be the combination dosage to be used for further evaluation. Using Investigator Reported assessments confirmed by evaluation after 2 additional cycles of treatment, 2 patients in the obatoclax 30 mg/bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 dosage group and 1 patient in the obatoclax 30 mg/bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 dosage group achieved a CR/CRu. Two of these patients had prior high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplants, and the third had prior bortezomib. Conclusions: Obatoclax and bortezomib (45 mg and 1.3 mg/m2, respectively) administered on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 of a 21 day cycle was found to have acceptable tolerability. Building on pre-clinical data indicating synergy, this study supports a novel twice-weekly administration schedule for obatoclax with bortezomib, and demonstrates initial evidence of efficacy of the combination in heavily-pretreated patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Prior Treatment and Response by Dosage Group Dosage Group* Mean # Regimens Prior Bortezomib CR/CRu SD PD Unk^ Total * Obatoclax mg/bortezomib mg/m2 ^ Follow-up ongoing 30/1.0 2 (1–3) 1 2 1 0 0 3 30/1.3 3 (1–7) 1 1 1 1 0 3 45/1.3 2 (1–4) 3 0 2 3 1 6

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document