Efficacy and Safety of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Remobilization with Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF In Adult Patients with Non-Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2249-2249
Author(s):  
Mitchell E. Horwitz ◽  
Edward Gorak ◽  
Peter Holman ◽  
Edward Libby ◽  
Dirk Huebner ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2249 Background: Although high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is a potentially curative procedure for patients with hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies, a significant number are unable to mobilize sufficient cells to proceed to transplant. While the safety and efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF is well established for front-line and salvage mobilization in patients with myeloma and lymphoma, data are limited for patients with non hematological malignancies. We now report on the safety and efficacy of remobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF in patients in this setting. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients >18 years with non hematological malignancies enrolled in the US plerixafor compassionate use program (CUP). In the CUP, patients with previous mobilization failure (defined as the inability to collect ≥2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg or achieve an adequate peripheral blood (PB) count, typically ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl) were remobilized with plerixafor + G-CSF with the goal of collecting 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg to proceed to transplant. G-CSF (10μg/kg SC) was given every morning for 5 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was given in the evening on Day 4, ~11 hours prior to apheresis the next day. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until patients collected ≥2×106 CD34+ cells/kg. Results: The analysis included 32 patients (median age 32.5 years) with germ cell tumor (n=21), medulloblastoma (n=4), sarcoma (n=3), breast cancer (n=2), cervical cancer (n=1) or chordoma (n=1). Previous mobilization regimens included growth factor alone in 22 patients and growth factor + chemotherapy in 10 patients; 25 patients failed to collect the minimum transplantable cell dose (median yield: 1.27 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg); 7 patients did not undergo apheresis due to low PB CD34+ cells. Remobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF resulted in a median yield of 2.8 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; the median number of apheresis days was 2 (range 1–4). Twenty-two (69%) patients collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; the median time to collect the target cell dose was 2 days (range 1–3 days). The median CD34+ cell yield for patients with germ cell tumors was 3.16 × 106 cells/kg. Twenty-four (75%) patients proceeded to transplant; 8/21 patients with germ cell tumors received tandem transplants. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 and 20 days, respectively. Drug-related adverse events were observed in 12 (38%) patients; most were mild and commonly included injection site reactions (n=6), diarrhea (n=3), nausea (n=2) and bone pain (n=2). None of the patients experienced serious adverse events. Conclusions: Mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF facilitates collection of an adequate number of HSC in the majority of adult patients with non-hematologic malignancies who have failed prior mobilization with growth factor ± chemotherapy. Using this salvage approach 75% of patients who otherwise would not have had the option could successfully undergo autologous transplantation. Disclosures: Horwitz: Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Plerixafor (Mozobil®), a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer, is approved by the US FDA in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Huebner: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mody: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schriber: Genzyme Corporation: Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2161-2161
Author(s):  
Alessandro de Moura Almeida ◽  
Helma Pinchemel Cotrim ◽  
Dayanne Costa Fonseca ◽  
Dora Marcia Alencar ◽  
Daniela Dourado Dutra ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (AHCT) is an integral part of the treatment for many hematological and immunological diseases. However, the AHCT is associated with several complications, including liver diseases, such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), viral hepatitis, and sepsis-associated cholestasis. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most common and serious adverse drug side effects. This issue is particularly important in the context of high dose chemotherapy but it is still understudied. This study aims to determine the incidence of SOS and DILI among patients who underwent the autologous stem cell transplant. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all patients who had undergone an autologous stem cell transplant at the hospital of Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Brazil, from July 2010 to July 2017. Daily weight and clinical and laboratory data ̶ aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamaGT (GGT), and total bilirubin (TB) levels ̶ were collected from beginning of the conditioning regimen to D+21 post-transplant. SOS diagnosis was based on modified Seattle Criteria (2 of 3 of the following items during the first 21 days post-transplant: TB ≥ 2mg/dl, hepatomegaly or upper right quadrant abdominal pain, and weight gain above 2% of pre-transplant weight). SOS severity was based on EBMT criteria. The International Serious Adverse Events Consortium 2011 criteria was used for DILI diagnosis, considering any of the following: (1) hepatocellular DILI: ALT ≥ 5 x upper limit normal (ULN); (2) cholestatic DILI: ALP ≥ 2 x ULN, especially in patients with elevated GGT, and without bone-disease-related ALP elevation; (3) mixed DILI: ALT ≥ 3 x ULN and total bilirubin (TB) ≥ 2 x ULN. All patients with SOS were excluded for the DILI diagnosis. All statistics were calculated using SPSS v 20.0 (SPSS Inc). Descriptive analysis and chi-square were applied, and the alpha error was 5%. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. Results: One hundred and seventy-five patients were included in the study. The mean age was 44.2 ± 15.4 years old, and 56.6% of patients (n= 99) were male. The main transplant indications were the following: multiple myeloma (55.4%, n= 97), lymphoma (36.0%, n= 63), acute myeloid leukemia (3.4%, n= 6), and germ cell tumor (3.4%, n= 6). Most patients presented aminotransferases (73.1%, n= 128) or ALP (44.0%, n= 77) elevations, but DILI incidence was 12% (n= 21). Hepatic, cholestatic, and mixed DILI were found in 3 (1.7%), 15 (8.6%), and 3 (1.7%) patients respectively. Five of six patients who developed hepatocellular or mixed DILI were exposed to etoposide (p=0.006). Cholestatic DILI occurred in 12 melphalan-based and 3 busulfan-based patients. The prophylactic use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was associated with lower incidence of DILI (incidence among UDCA users: 1/43; incidence among non-users of UDCA: 20/132; p= 0,028). Mortality among DILI patients was 12% (n=2). SOS incidence was 6.9% (n= 12); 4 (33.3%) patients with mild, 4 (33.3%) with moderate, 2 (16.7%) with severe, and 2 (16.7%) with severe SOS. A higher incidence of SOS was found among recipients who was transplanted for germ cell tumors (p= 0.004); those previously submitted to abdominal irradiation (p= 0.068) and iron overload (p= 0.068); only one patient died from this syndrome. Almost all (83.3%; n=5) patients submitted to AHCT for germ cell tumors (using carboplatin + etoposide as conditioning regimen) developed liver injury (3 patients developed SOS and 2 developed DILI). Conclusion: Liver injury associated with the autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, represented mainly by DILI and SOS, had a high incidence (18.9%) among the subjects in the study and was associated with an elevated mortality rate. Drug induced liver injury has been underestimated and deserves further studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


JBMTCT ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Claudio Galvao de Castro Junior

The indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in solid tumors in children do not change a lot since our first Brazilian consensus publication in 2009.  In this article, we are going to review indications to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric germ cell tumors and wilms tumor. For the consensus, a review was made using the most relevant articles, and a series of meetings was done to discuss the recommendations.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2245-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Shenoy ◽  
Barbara Asselin ◽  
Jignesh Dalal ◽  
Rakesh Goyal ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2245 Background: High dose chemo/radiotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is indicated in several pediatric malignant disorders such as neuroblastoma and relapsed Hodgkin's disease. Ideally, 2–5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg should be infused during autologous peripheral blood (PB) HSCT to support timely and durable engraftment and improve transplant outcomes. In patients who have received repetitive cycles of intensive chemotherapy, this target is not always achieved with standard mobilization regimens. Plerixafor, a novel CXCR4 antagonist, when combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), can safely and predictably mobilize adequate numbers of CD34+ HSC to support transplantation in adult patients with myeloma and lymphoma. We report on the safety and efficacy of PB HSC mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF in pediatric patients with cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all children with various malignant disorders who were enrolled in the US plerixafor compassionate use program (CUP; NCT00291811). Patients who had previously failed HSC mobilization (defined as the inability to collect ≥2 x106 CD34+ cells/kg or achieve an adequate PB CD34+ cell count, typically ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl) with growth factor +/− chemotherapy were treated with plerixafor + G-CSF. The goal was to collect ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for autologous HSCT. G-CSF (10μg/kg SC) was administered daily for 5 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was given in the evening on Day 4, ~11 hours prior to apheresis. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg had been collected. Results: A total of 16 patients with non Hodgkin's lymphoma (3), Hodgkin's disease (1), CNS tumors (4), Ewing's sarcoma (4), neuroblastoma (2), osteogenic sarcoma (1) and desmoplastic small cell tumor (1) underwent the procedure. The median age was 14 years and 7 (44%) patients were male. In previous mobilization attempts, 5 patients failed to collect the minimum transplantable cell dose with a median yield of 0.44 x106 (range: 0.17–2.2 × 106) CD34+ cells/kg. Apheresis was never attempted in11 patients due to low PB CD34+ cell levels; median cells/μl was 1.0 (range, 0.01–12) in 9 patients with available data. Initial mobilization regimens included growth factor alone in 6 patients and growth factor + chemotherapy in 9 patients (data unavailable for 1 patient). When re-challenged for mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF, 14 (88%) patients successfully collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; this included all 4 (100%) patients with lymphoma and 10 (83%) patients with solid tumors. The median time to collect the target cell dose was 1.5 days (range 1–5 days). The median CD34+ cell yield from all patients was 3.5 × 106 cells/kg (range 0.96 – 9.80 × 106); patients with lymphoma and solid tumors collected a median of 7.2 (range 3.2 – 7.9) × 106 and 3.3 (range 0.96 –9.8) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Eleven (69%) patients proceeded to transplant including all 4 (100%) patients with lymphoma and 7 (58%) patients with solid tumors. One patient with neuroblastoma received a tandem transplant. The median infused cell dose was 4.18 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.7 – 7.6 × 106). The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 14 and 33 days, respectively. Plerixafor-related adverse events were mostly mild, and observed in 5 (31%) patients. They included administration site reactions (4), vomiting (2), nausea (1) and oral paraesthesia (1). No patient experienced a serious adverse event. Conclusions: Treatment with plerixafor + G-CSF safely and effectively mobilized HSC in the majority of pediatric patients with malignant disorders after failure of standard mobilization with growth factor ± chemotherapy. Successful stem cell mobilization allowed consideration of autologous HSCT when indicated. Mobilization with plerixafor was safe and resulted in prompt engraftment. Many of these patients could not have proceeded to transplant without this intervention. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Plerixafor (Mozobil®), a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer, is approved by the US FDA in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. McCarty: Genzyme, Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Angell: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1283-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
M E Horwitz ◽  
G Long ◽  
P Holman ◽  
E Libby ◽  
G C Calandra ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1921-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Kathy Hogan ◽  
Cindy Kramer ◽  
Coleen Butcher ◽  
Amanda Littleton ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1921 Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell (AHSC) mobilization is often performed utilizing filgrastim (G-CSF) without prior chemotherapy. The CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor enhances the ability of filgrastim to mobilize CD34+ cells but adds substantial cost to the mobilization. Several algorithms have been proposed utilizing the patient's actual capacity to mobilize CD34+ cells to determine the need to add plerixafor after filgrastim has been initiated. The pegylated form of filgrastim (pegfilgrastim) has been used as an alternative and more convenient method of mobilization and has in a few instances been utilized with plerixafor. We hypothesize that replacing weight-based filgrastim with flat dose pegfilgrastim in a validated cost-saving mobilization algorithm for patient-adapted use of plerixafor will add convenience without increase in cost. Methods: Single center retrospective analysis comparing mobilization outcomes and estimated total cost of mobilization in two consecutive cohorts undergoing filgrastim mobilization (FIL) or pegfilgrastim mobilization (PEG) prior to AHSCT for multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoma (LY). Subjects in FIL received filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously continuing until completion of collection while subjects in PEG received one flat dose of 12 mg of pegfilgrastim. In both cohorts peripheral blood CD34+ cells (PB-CD34+) enumeration was performed on the fourth day after initiation of growth factor. Subjects surpassing a certain target-specific threshold of PB-CD34+ (e.g 14 cells/mm3 for target of 3 × 106 CD34+/kg and 25 cells/mm3 for target of 6 × 106 CD34+/kg) started apheresis on the same day while subjects with lower PB-CD34+ received plerixafor 240 mcg/kg subcutaneously in the evening of the fourth day and apheresis was started on the fifth day (Figure 1). Decision to use of plerixafor followed the same previously validated algorithm in both cohorts. Apheresis, and growth factor +/− plerixafor were continued until the mobilization target was met. Analysis of estimated total cost of mobilization utilized average wholesale price (AWP) for drugs and institutional average charges for apheresis, cryopreservation and laboratory tests from a representative sample of subjects. Results: Seventy-four consecutive subjects were included in FIL and 47 in PEG. The two cohorts were comparable in terms of age (57.5 vs. 52.2), proportion of patients with diagnosis of MM (63.5% vs.66%), proportion of MM patients previously exposed to lenalidomide (63.8% vs. 51.6%), average body weight (82.9 vs.84 kg) and average mobilization target (4.5 vs. 5 × 106 CD34+/kg). Overall 68/74 in FIL and 43/47 patients in PEG met the mobilization target (Table). Only one patient in each cohort required re-mobilization before proceeding to AHSCT. Median PB-CD34+ on day 4 was significantly higher in PEG. Consequently, by utilizing the same decision algorithm, patients in PEG received fewer subcutaneous injections and were less likely to require administration of plerixafor. Cohorts had near identical average number of apheresis sessions and comparable CD34+ yield. The estimated cost associated with growth factor was on average US$3,069 higher in PEG, but it was counterbalanced by an estimated $4,287 saving in plerixafor cost, resulting in no significant difference in the estimated overall cost of mobilization. Conclusion: Single administration of pegfilgrastim 12 mg is associated with better CD34+ mobilization than filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day in patients with MM and LY allowing for effective mobilization with less frequent use of plerixafor. Pegfilgrastin with patient adapted used of plerixafor is a reliable, convenient and cost-neutral strategy for AHSC mobilization. Disclosures: Costa: Genzyme: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Pegfilgrastim - autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document