Anti-HLA Antibodies in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation From HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donors

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4475-4475
Author(s):  
Anna Koclega ◽  
Miroslaw Markiewicz ◽  
Urszula Siekiera ◽  
Alicja Dobrowolska ◽  
Sylwia Mizia ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4475 Introduction: Anti-HLA Antibodies (Abs) are considered an important factor in solid organ transplants and transfusion medicine, but role of humoral arm of immunological response to HLA antigens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is unknown. Large polymorphism and immunogenicity of HLA-antigens and heterogeneity of anti-HLA Abs warrant the need of such investigation. The purpose of this study was to define presence and profiles of anti-HLA Abs detected before or after allo-HSCT from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors and their impact on allo-HSCT results. Material and methods: 35 HLA-mismatched donor/recipient pairs entered the study. Indication for allo-HSCT was: ALL (7pts), AML(18pts), CML(5pts), SAA(2pts), CLL(1pt), MDS(1pt) and PNH (1pt). Preparative regimen was myeloablative in 33pts (94.3%) and reduced in 2pts (5.7%). Standard GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine, methotrexate and pre-transplant anti-thymocyte globulin (34pts) or Alemtuzumab (1pt). HLA A, B, C, DR, DQ alleles were PCR-typed. 21(60%) pts had mismatch of single HLA-antigen: A-4(11.4%), B-1(2.8%), C-13(37%), DQ-3(8,5%); 10(28.5%) pts had mismatch of single HLA-allele: A-3(8.5%), B(11.4%), DQ-3(8.5%); 4 pts had double antigenic (A+C and A+DQ) or combined antigenic/allelic (A/B and C/A) HLA mismatches. Anti-HLA A, B, C, DR, DQ, DP Abs were identified in sera collected before start of the conditioning treatment and +30 days, +100 days and 1 year after allo-HSCT with use of automated DynaChip assay utilizing microchips bearing purified class I and class II HLA antigens. Results: Anti-HLA Abs pre-formed before allo-HSCT were detected in 17(48.5%) pts: against class I, II or both in 6(35%), 4(24%) and 7(41%) pts. Anti-HLA Abs were detected after allo-HSCT in 25(71.4%) pts, against class I, II or both in 9(36%), 3(12%) and 13(52%) pts, respectively. In 7 pts anti-HLA Abs were not detected neither before nor after allo-HSCT. Anti-HLA Abs directed against the mismatched HLA antigens were observed in 4 pts before and in 10 pts after allo-HSCT, no anti-HLA Abs specific against mismatched alleles were detected. Allo-HSCT results obtained in studied subgroups are presented in the Table below: Conclusions: Our preliminary results indicate that anti-HLA Abs are present pre- or post-transplant in mismatched allo-HSCT recipients and may be potentially responsible for the occurrence of complications, what needs to be further investigated and analyzed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4542-4542
Author(s):  
Miroslaw Markiewicz ◽  
Anna Koclega ◽  
Sylwia Mizia ◽  
Urszula Siekiera ◽  
Alicja Dobrowolska ◽  
...  

Introduction Although anti-HLA Antibodies (Abs) are considered an important factor of graft failure in solid organ transplants, their role in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still undiscovered. Large polymorphism and immunogenicity of HLA-antigens and heterogeneity of anti-HLA Abs warrant the need of such investigation. The purpose of this study was to define the presence of anti-HLA Abs before allo-HSCT from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors and their impact on engraftment and post-transplant full donor’s chimerism. Material and Methods 70 HLA-mismatched donor/recipient pairs entered the study. Indication for allo-HSCT was: ALL, AML, CML, SAA, PNH, MDS and CLL. Preparative regimen was myeloablative in 68pts (97%) and reduced in 2pts (2.3%). Standard GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine, methotrexate and pre-transplant anti-thymocyte globulin (69pts) or Alemtuzumab (1pt). HLA A,B,C,DR,DQ alleles were PCR-typed. Single HLA-antigen was mismatched in 46pts, single HLA-allele in 16pts, double antigens or alleles in 2 pts and another 2 pts had combined antigenic/allelic HLA mismatch. Anti-HLA A,B,C,DR,DQ,DP Abs were identified in sera collected prior to the conditioning treatment with use of automated DynaChip assay utilizing microchips bearing purified class I and class II HLA antigens. Post-transplant chimerism was analyzed using STR-PCR method at 30, 100-days and 1-year after allo-HSCT. Results Anti-HLA Abs pre-formed before allo-HSCT were detected in 32pts: against class I, II or both in 13(18.6%), 7(10%) and 12(17.1%) pts. Anti-HLA Abs were detected after allo-HSCT in 49pts: against class I, II or both in 22(32.4%), 7(10.3%) and 20(29.4%) pts, respectively. Anti-HLA Abs directed against the mismatched HLA antigens were observed in 4 pts before allo-HSCT. Although no Abs specific to mismatched HLA alleles were detected, Abs belonging to the same Cross-Reactive Groups (CREGs) were present in 5pts. No graft failure has been observed (graft failure was defined as absence of neutrophil recovery by day 30 after allo-HSCT or loss of donor’s chimerism). The detection of anti-HLA Abs before allo-HSCT was associated with decrease of post-transplant donor’s chimerism (18/31 vs 11/35, p=0.03). Anti-HLA Abs had no significant impact on engraftment of platelets and neutrophils. The median time to neutrophils engraftment was 16.9 days (range 7-31 days) in pts with and 18.9 days (range 13-30 days) in pts without anti-HLA Abs (p=0.188). The median time to platelets engraftment was 16.9 days (range 9-31 days) in patients with and 18.3 days (range 10-32 days) in pts without anti-HLA Abs (p=0.274). Conclusions Our preliminary results indicate, that anti-HLA Abs are present before transplantation in mismatched allo-HSCT recipients. They influence the post-transplant full donor’s chimerism, but they did not influence engraftment and graft failure. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3087-3087
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Stephane Morisset ◽  
Marie Y. Detrait ◽  
Helene Labussiere ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3087 Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents the only potential to cure wide types of hematological diseases. A patient has 30% of chance to find a HLA-identical sibling donor while the rest of patients should find an alternative unrelated donor. The use of 10/10 HLA matched unrelated transplants has been used as a main alternative and with its unavailability, when available, a 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated transplant has been used. The outcome of this last mismatched transplant is not very clear and its use according to patient and disease conditions has not been well defined yet. Aims To evaluate the outcome of allo-HSCT from 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donors compared to those from 10/10 HLA identical unrelated donors and siblings; and to define which category of patients can benefit the more in each alternative. Material and methods We have retrospectively studied the outcome of 213 patients who received allo-HSCT for different hematological malignancies, 121 (57%) from HLA identical siblings, 63 (29%) from 10/10 HLA identical unrelated donors and 29 (14%) from 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donors treated during the same period of time between 2006 and 2011 at our institution. In the mismatched group, 12 patients had the mismatch at HLA-A locus, 7 at the HLA-B, 7 at the HLA-C and 3 at the HLA-DQ. Characteristics between the 3 groups were comparable except for: disease type between the 2 unrelated groups, sex-matching, CMV-matching and ABO-matching. The different characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Results After HSCT, engraftment was significantly lower in the 9/10 HLA group (90%) than in the 10/10 HLA group (95%) than in the sibling group (99%), (p=0.03); the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD ≥2 at 3 months was 32% (23–41), 20% (15–26) and 27% (23–32) respectively; the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD at one year was 21% (13–30), 9% (5–13) and 17% (14–21) for the 3 groups respectively. After a median follow-up of 8 months (0–54) in the 9/10 HLA group, 10 months (0–60) in the 10/10 HLA group and 18 months in the siblings group, the median overall survival (OS) was 10 months (5–21), 18 months (11-NR) and 60 months (31-NR) respectively with a 2-years probability of 19% (8–44), 43% (31–59) and 63% (54–74) respectively. There was a higher but not significant relapse incidence at one year in the 9/10 HLA group compared to other groups while the transplant related mortality was significantly higher with a cumulative incidence at 1 year of 45% (35–55), (p<0.001) (Table1-results). In multivariate analysis, OS was negatively affected by unrelated donors [9/10 HR=5 (2.7–10), p=0.0001; 10/10 HR=2 (1.2–4), p=0.01], female donors [HR=2 (1.4–4), p=0.03] and disease status < CR1 or <chronic phase (CP) 1 [HR=3 (1.4–6), p=0.003]; while the TRM was negatively affected by unrelated donors [9/10 HR=9 (4–20), p<0.001; 10/10 HR=4 (1.2–10), p=0.03], female donors [HR=3 (1.2–7); p=0.01] and ABO minor incompatibility [HR=2.5 (1.2–5), p=0.01]. The funnel plot showing the adjusted TRM according to all covariates and comparing to the global population death rate, shows that the 9/10 HLA group has the worse TRM independently of any other factor. Conclusion We showed that allo-HSCT from 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donors have a significantly worse OS than those from matched unrelated donors and siblings; this was mainly due to an increased TRM in this group. Patients in first CR or CP could benefit the more from matched or 9/10 unrelated allo-HSCT while the use of transplants from 9/10 HLA unrelated donors in patients not in CR1 or CP1 should be limited to clinical trials. In view of these results, we should consider and evaluate the use of cord blood as an alternative source of transplant according to patient and disease conditions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document