Phase I Trial Of The Targeted Alpha-Particle Nano-Generator Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) In Combination With Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) For Older Patients With Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1460-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Jae H Park ◽  
Dan Douer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Abnormalities ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells and has modest activity against AML. To increase the antibody’s potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity seen with β-emitting isotopes, the isotope generator 225Ac (t½=10 days), which yields 4 α-particles, was conjugated to lintuzumab. A phase I trial demonstrated that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 μCi/kg and has anti-leukemic activity across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods Patients ≥ 60 yrs who had untreated AML with poor-prognostic factors, such as an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD), unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities, were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg bid for 10 days every 4-6 weeks. During cycle 1, beginning 4-7 days after LDAC, two doses of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given approximately one week apart. Results Seven patients (median age, 76 yrs; range, 72-80 yrs) were treated, all of whom had AHDs. Five (71%) had intermediate-risk cytogenetics, and two (29%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. The median CD33 expression was 76% (range, 69-95%). Prior therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome included hypomethylating agents (n=4) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). Patients received 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3) or 1 (n=4) μCi/kg/fraction, two fractions per patient (total administered activity, 68-199 μCi). Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in one patient receiving 1 μCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia in the setting of an aplastic bone marrow that persisted > 6 wks after completing the second fraction of 225Ac-lintuzumab. Other toxicities included grade 3 febrile neutropenia (n=5), bacteremia (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient increase in creatinine (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=1). Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 4 of 6 evaluable patients (67%) after cycle 1 (mean blast reduction, 58%; range, 34-100%). No CRs, however, were observed. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range, 1-4), and the median time to progression was 2.5 months (range, 2-7+ months). Conclusions Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab in combination with LDAC is feasible, safe, and has anti-leukemic activity. Accrual continues to define the MTD, with planned dose levels up to 2 μCi/kg/fraction. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Disclosures: Jurcic: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ravandi:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pagel:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Douer:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Estey:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Ac-225-Lintuzumab, Ac-225-Lintuzumab Patents & Royalties, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Immunotherapy with Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) in Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3794-3794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Jae H. Park ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: The use of short-ranged (50-80 µm), high-energy (~100 keV/µm) α particle-emitting isotopes for radioimmunotherapy may result in more specific tumor cell kill and less damage to normal tissues than β-emitters. 225Ac-lintuzumab consists of a radiometal that emits four α-particles linked to an anti-CD33 antibody. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-tumor activity against relapsed/refractory AML across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 years with untreated AML not suitable for standard induction chemotherapy (e.g., antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities) were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 days every 4-6 weeks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, two fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given one week apart, beginning 4-7 days following completion of LDAC. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. 225Ac doses were escalated using a 3+3 design. Four dose levels were studied with a total accrual of up to 24 patients. In planned analyses, dose escalation proceeded if < 33% of patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Fourteen patients (median age, 77 years; range, 68-87 years) completed therapy. An additional patient received only one of two planned fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab due to technical issues and is excluded from analysis. Nine (64%) had prior myelodysplastic syndrome, for which seven received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=6) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (7%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in molecular remission prior to development of AML. Nine patients (64%) had intermediate-risk and five (36%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. Median CD33 expression was 81% (range, 45-100%). 225Ac-lintuzumab was given at 0.5 (n=3), 1 (n=6), 1.5 (n=3), or 2 (n=2) μCi/kg/fraction. Up to 4 cycles of LDAC were administered. DLT was seen in one patient at 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with marrow aplasia for more than 6 weeks following therapy. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=4) and thrombocytopenia (n=6). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=7), pneumonia (n=4), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient creatinine increase (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), rectal hemorrhage (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=2). Eight of 11 patients (73%) evaluated after Cycle 1 had bone marrow blast reductions (mean reduction, 72%; range, 34-100%). Seven (64%) had blast reductions of at least 50%. Objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRp, 2 CRi) were seen in four of the 14 patients (29%) after one cycle of therapy (Table 1). Responses were seen only at doses ≥ 1 µCi/kg/fraction (4 of 11 patients, 36%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months (range, 1.7-16.9 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 months (range, 2.2-24 months). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab can be safely combined with LDAC and produce remission in older patients with untreated AML. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Table 1. Objective Responses Response Dose Level (μCi/kg/fraction) Total (n=14) 0.5 (n=3) 1 (n=6) 1.5 (n=3) 2 (n=2) CR 0 0 1 (33%) 0 1 (7%) CRp 0 0 0 1 (50%) 1 (7%) CRi 0 1 (17%) 1 (33%) 0 2 (14%) Overall Response 0 1 (17%) 2 (67%) 1 (50%) 4 (29%) Abbreviations: CR, complete remission; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; CRi, CR with incomplete count recovery. Disclosures Jurcic: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma US, Invc.: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck and Co.: Consultancy; Celgene Corp.: Research Funding; Actrinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ac-225-lintuzumab is an investigational agent being developed for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.. Pagel:Actinium Pharmacetuicals, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy. Levy:Takeda: Consultancy. Perl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy Using Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) in Combination with Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) for Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5293-5293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G Jurcic ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Jae H Park ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Particle Therapy ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Molecular Abnormalities ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells but has only modest activity in AML. To increase the antibody’s potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity of β-emitting isotopes, 225Ac (t½=10 d), a radiometal that yields 4 α-particles, was conjugated to lintuzumab. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-leukemic activity across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 yrs who had untreated AML with poor prognostic factors, e.g., an antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities, were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 d every 4-6 wks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, beginning 4-7 days after completion of LDAC, two doses of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given approximately one week apart. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. Results: Nine patients (median age, 76 yrs; range, 73-81 yrs) were treated. Seven patients (78%) had a history of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for which five (56%) received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=4) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (11%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in a molecularly undetectable state at the time of AML diagnosis. Six patients (67%) had intermediate-risk cytogenetics, and three (33%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. The median CD33 expression was 76% (range, 45-100%). Patients received 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3) or 1 (n=6) μCi/kg/fraction. Total administered activity ranged from 68-199 μCi. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range, 1-4). Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in one patient receiving 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with bone marrow aplasia persisting > 6 wks after receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=1) and thrombocytopenia (n=3). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=2), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient increase in creatinine (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=1). Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 5 of 7 patients (71%) evaluated after Cycle 1. Mean blast reduction was 61% (range, 34-100%). Three of the 7 patients (43%) had marrow blast reductions of ≥ 50%; however, no remissions were observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.5 mos (range, 1.7-15.7+ mos). Median overall survival (OS) from study entry was 5.4 mos (range, 2.2-24 mos). For the 7 patients with prior MDS, median OS was 9.1 mos (range 2.3-24 mos). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab in combination with LDAC is feasible, safe, and has anti-leukemic activity. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD, with planned doses up to 2 µCi/kg/fraction. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Disclosures Ravandi: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pagel:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wahl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.

Phase I Trial of the Targeted Alpha-Particle Nano-Generator Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33; HuM195) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 768-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Todd L. Rosenblat ◽  
Michael R. McDevitt ◽  
Neeta Pandit-Taskar ◽  
Jorge A. Carrasquillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Bone Marrow Blast ◽  
Elimination Kinetics ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 768 Background: Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells and has modest activity against AML. To increase the antibody's potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity seen with β-emitting isotopes, the α-emitter bismuth-213 (213Bi) was conjugated to lintuzumab. Substantial clinical activity was seen in phase I and II trials, but the use of 213Bi is limited by its 46-min half-life. The isotope generator, 225Ac (t½=10 days), yields 4 α-emitting isotopes and can be conjugated to a variety of antibodies using DOTA-SCN. 225Ac-labeled immunoconjugates kill in vitro at radioactivity doses at least 1,000 times lower than 213Bi analogs and prolong survival in mouse xenograft models of several cancers (McDevitt et al. Science 2001). Methods: We are conducting a first-in-man phase I dose escalation trial to determine the safety, pharmacology, and biological activity of 225Ac-lintuzumab in AML. Results: Fifteen patients (median age, 62 yrs; range, 45–80 yrs) with relapsed (n=10) or refractory (n=5) AML were treated to date. Patients received a single infusion of 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3), 1 (n=4), 2 (n=3), 3 (n=3), or 4 (n=2) μCi/kg (total administered activity, 23–402 μCi). No acute toxicities were seen. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity; the median time to resolution of grade 4 leukopenia was 26 days (range, 0–71 days). DLT was seen in 3 patients, including myelosuppression lasting >35 days in 1 patient receiving 4 μCi/kg and death due to sepsis in 2 patients treated at the 3 and 4 μCi/kg dose levels. Febrile neutropenia was seen in 4 patients, and 4 patients had grade 3/4 bacteremia. Extramedullary toxicities were limited to transient grade 2/3 liver function abnormalities in 4 patients. With a median follow-up of 2 mos (range, 1–24 mos), no evidence of radiation nephritis was seen. We analyzed plasma pharmacokinetics by gamma counting at energy windows for 2 daughters of 225Ac, francium-221 (221Fr) and 213Bi. Two-phase elimination kinetics were seen with mean plasma t½-α and t½-β of 1.9 and 35 hours, respectively. These results are similar to other lintuzumab constructs labeled with long-lived radioisotopes. Peripheral blood blasts were eliminated in 9 of 14 evaluable patients (64%), but only at doses of ≥1 μCi/kg. Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 8 of 12 evaluable patients (67%) at 4 weeks, including 6 patients (50%) who had a blast reduction of ≥50%. Three patients treated with 1, 3, and 4 μCi/kg achieved bone marrow blast reductions to ≤5%. Conclusions: This is the first study to show that therapy with a targeted α-particle generator is feasible in humans. 225Ac-lintuzumab has antileukemic activity across all dose levels. Accrual to this trial continues to define the MTD. Disclosures: Jurcic: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. McDevitt:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals p53 Mediated Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Expansion Supports Acute Myeloid Leukemia Development

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Rasoul Pourebrahimabadi ◽  
Zoe Alaniz ◽  
Lauren B Ostermann ◽  
Hung Alex Luong ◽  
Rafael Heinz Montoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Osteoblast Differentiation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease that develops within a complex microenvironment. Reciprocal interactions between the bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and AML cells can promote AML progression and resistance to chemotherapy (Jacamo et al., 2014). We have recently reported that BM-MSCs derived from AML patients (n=103) highly express p53 and p21 compared to their normal counterparts (n=73 p&lt;0.0001) (Hematologica, 2018). To assess the function of p53 in BM-MSCs, we generated traceable lineage specific mouse models targeting Mdm2 or Trp53 alleles in MSCs (Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl and Osx-Cre;mTmG;Mdm2fl/+) or hematopoietic cells (Vav-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl and Vav-Cre;mTmG;Mdm2fl/+). Homozygote deletion of Mdm2 (Osx-Cre;Mdm2fl/fl) resulted in death at birth and displayed skeletal defects as well as lack of intramedullary hematopoiesis. Heterozygote deletion of Mdm2 in MSCs was dispensable for normal hematopoiesis in adult mice, however, resulted in bone marrow failure and thrombocytopenia after irradiation. Homozygote deletion of Mdm2 in hematopoietic cells (Vav-Cre;Mdm2fl/fl) was embryonically lethal but the heterozygotes were radiosensitive. We next sought to examine if p53 levels in BM-MSCs change after cellular stress imposed by AML. We generated a traceable syngeneic AML model using AML-ETO leukemia cells transplanted into Osx-Cre;mTmG mice. We found that p53 was highly induced in BM-MSCs of AML mice, further confirming our findings in primary patient samples. The population of BM-MSCs was significantly increased in bone marrow Osx-Cre;mTmG transplanted with syngeneic AML cells. Tunnel staining of bone marrow samples in this traceable syngeneic AML model showed a block in apoptosis of BM-MSCs suggesting that the expansion of BM-MSCs in AML is partly due to inhibition of apoptosis. As the leukemia progressed the number of Td-Tomato positive cells which represents hematopoietic lineage and endothelial cells were significantly decreased indicating failure of normal hematopoiesis induced by leukemia. SA-β-gal activity was significantly induced in osteoblasts derived from leukemia mice in comparison to normal mice further supporting our observation in human leukemia samples that AML induces senescence of BM-MSCs. To examine the effect of p53 on the senescence associated secretory profile (SASP) of BM-MSCs, we measured fifteen SASP cytokines by qPCR and found significant decrease in Ccl4, Cxcl12, S100a8, Il6 and Il1b upon p53 deletion in BM-MSCs (Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl) compared to p53 wildtype mice. To functionally evaluate the effects of p53 in BM-MSCs on AML, we deleted p53 in BM-MSCs (Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl) and transplanted them with syngeneic AML-ETO-Turquoise AML cells. Deletion of p53 in BM-MSCs strongly inhibited the expansion of BM-MSCs in AML and resulted in osteoblast differentiation. This suggests that expansion of BM-MSCs in AML is dependent on p53 and that deletion of p53 results in osteoblast differentiation of BM-MSCs. Importantly, deletion of p53 in BM-MSCs significantly increased the survival of AML mice. We further evaluated the effect of a Mdm2 inhibitor, DS-5272, on BM-MSCs in our traceable mouse models. DS-5272 treatment of Osx-cre;Mdm2fl/+ mice resulted in complete loss of normal hematopoietic cells indicating a non-cell autonomous regulation of apoptosis of hematopoietic cells mediated by p53 in BM-MSCs. Loss of p53 in BM-MSCs (Osx-Cre;p53fl/fl) completely rescued hematopoietic failure following Mdm2 inhibitor treatment. In conclusion, we identified p53 activation as a novel mechanism by which BM-MSCs regulate proliferation and apoptosis of hematopoietic cells. This knowledge highlights a new mechanism of hematopoietic failure after AML therapy and informs new therapeutic strategies to eliminate AML. Disclosures Khoury: Angle: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding. Bueso-Ramos:Incyte: Consultancy. Andreeff:BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NIH/NCI: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Reata: Equity Ownership; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Mdm2 inhibitor-DS 5272

scholarly journals EZH2 Mutations and Impact on Clinical Outcome Analyzed in 1604 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1528-1528
Author(s):  
Sebastian Stasik ◽  
Jan Moritz Middeke ◽  
Michael Kramer ◽  
Christoph Rollig ◽  
Alwin Krämer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose: The enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyltransferase and key epigenetic regulator involved in transcriptional repression and embryonic development. Loss of EZH2 activity by inactivating mutations is associated with poor prognosis in myeloid malignancies such as MDS. More recently, EZH2 inactivation was shown to induce chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Göllner et al., 2017). Data on the frequency and prognostic role of EZH2-mutations in AML are rare and mostly confined to smaller cohorts. To investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of this alteration in more detail, we analyzed a large cohort of AML patients (n = 1604) for EZH2 mutations. Patients and Methods: All patients analyzed had newly diagnosed AML, were registered in clinical protocols of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) (AML96, AML2003 or AML60+, SORAML) and had available material at diagnosis. Screening for EZH2 mutations and associated alterations was done using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, Illumina) on an Illumina MiSeq-system using bone marrow or peripheral blood. Detection was conducted with a defined cut-off of 5% variant allele frequency (VAF). All samples below the predefined threshold were classified as EZH2 wild type (wt). Patient clinical characteristics and co-mutations were analyzed according to the mutational status. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was used to identify the impact of EZH2 mutations on outcome. Results: EZH2-mutations were found in 63 of 1604 (4%) patients, with a median VAF of 44% (range 6-97%; median coverage 3077x). Mutations were detected within several exons (2-6; 8-12; 14-20) with highest frequencies in exons 17 and 18 (29%). The majority of detected mutations (71% missense and 29% nonsense/frameshift) were single nucleotide variants (SNVs) (87%), followed by small indel mutations. Descriptive statistics of clinical parameters and associated co-mutations revealed significant differences between EZH2-mut and -wt patients. At diagnosis, patients with EZH2 mutations were significantly older (median age 59 yrs) than EZH2-wt patients (median 56 yrs; p=0.044). In addition, significantly fewer EZH2-mut patients (71%) were diagnosed with de novo AML compared to EZH2-wt patients (84%; p=0.036). Accordingly, EZH2-mut patients had a higher rate of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (21%), evolving from prior MDS or after prior chemotherapy (tAML) (8%; p=0.036). Also, bone marrow (and blood) blast counts differed between the two groups (EZH2-mut patients had significantly lower BM and PB blast counts; p=0.013). In contrast, no differences were observed for WBC counts, karyotype, ECOG performance status and ELN-2017 risk category compared to EZH2-wt patients. Based on cytogenetics according to the 2017 ELN criteria, 35% of EZH2-mut patients were categorized with favorable risk, 28% had intermediate and 37% adverse risk. No association was seen with -7/7q-. In the group of EZH2-mut AML patients, significantly higher rates of co-mutations were detected in RUNX1 (25%), ASXL1 (22%) and NRAS (25%) compared to EZH2-wt patients (with 10%; 8% and 15%, respectively). Vice versa, concomitant mutations in NPM1 were (non-significantly) more common in EZH2-wt patients (33%) vs EZH2-mut patients (21%). For other frequently mutated genes in AML there was no major difference between EZH2-mut and -wt patients, e.g. FLT3ITD (13%), FLT3TKD (10%) and CEBPA (24%), as well as genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, namely, DNMT3A (21%), IDH1/2 (11/14%), and TET2 (21%). The correlation of EZH2 mutational status with clinical outcomes showed no effect of EZH2 mutations on the rate of complete remission (CR), relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (with a median OS of 18.4 and 17.1 months for EZH2-mut and -wt patients, respectively) in the univariate analyses. Likewise, the multivariate analysis with clinical variable such as age, cytogenetics and WBC using Cox proportional hazard regression, revealed that EZH2 mutations were not an independent risk factor for OS or RFS. Conclusion EZH mutations are recurrent alterations in patients with AML. The association with certain clinical factors and typical mutations such as RUNX1 and ASXL1 points to the fact that these mutations are associated with secondary AML. Our data do not indicate that EZH2 mutations represent an independent prognostic factor. Disclosures Middeke: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rollig:Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Scholl:Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbivie: Other: Travel support; Alexion: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Brümmendorf:Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Burchert:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Krause:Novartis: Research Funding. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Mayer:Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Serve:Bayer: Research Funding. Ehninger:Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Genetic Dissection of p53 Driven Senescence of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2625-2625
Author(s):  
Rasoul Pourebrahim ◽  
Peter P. Ruvolo ◽  
Steven M. Kornblau ◽  
Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos ◽  
Michael Andreeff
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Mscs ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Cells ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a genetically heterogeneous malignancy characterized by bone marrow infiltration of abnormally proliferating leukemic blasts which results in fatal anemia, bleeding and infectious complications due to compromised normal hematopoiesis. Patients with complete remission (CR) but incomplete blood cell count recovery (CRi) have significantly shorter survival compared to CR patients. Although there is a correlation between CRi and minimal residual disease (MRD), the two variables were shown to be independent risk factors for relapse development (1). The mechanism by which AML induces bone marrow failure in patients is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that AML derived MSCs highly express p53 and p21 proteins and are more senescent compared to their normal age-matched controls as demonstrated by high β-galactosidase staining (figure 1. A, B&C). Emerging evidence indicates that the aging of endosteal niche cells results in lower reconstitution potential of hematopoietic stem cells (2). To functionally evaluate the effects of AML on bone marrow MSCs, we utilized a murine leukemia model of the AML microenvironment. We transplanted Osx-Cre;mTmG mice with AML cells and compared the senescence of MSCs in normal bone marrow (Figure 1.D) with AML (Figure 1.E). Consistent with our initial findings in human, AML strongly induced senescence of osteoblasts. This suggests that AML suppresses normal hematopoiesis by inducing senescence in the hematopoietic niche. To address the role of p53 signaling in senescence of MSCs we generated a traceable conditional p53 gain/loss model specifically in bone marrow MSCs using Osx-Cre;mTmG; Mdm2fl/+ and Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl mice respectively (Figure 1.F). Deletion of p53 in bone marrow MSCs resulted in an increased population of osteoblasts (GFP+) in Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl mice in comparison to Osx-Cre;mTmG mice suggesting that p53 loss in osteoblasts inhibits senescence of osteoblasts. In order to evaluate p53 activity after recombination of p53fl alleles in the osteoblasts, we isolated MSCs from bone marrows and analyzed the expression of p21.P21 was significantly down regulated in osteoblasts (GFP+) derived from Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl mice whereas its expression in the hematopoietic cells from same tissue (tdTomato+) remained comparable to p53 wild type suggesting that p21 as the master regulator of senescence is regulated by p53 in bone marrow mesenchymal cells. To evaluate the effect of p53 loss in osteoblasts and its impact on hematopoietic cells, we isolated the GFP+ cells (osteoblasts) and RFP + cells (hematopoietic) by FACS. Senescent cells, non-cell autonomously, modulate the bone marrow microenvironment through the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). We analyzed the expression of fifteen SASP cytokines by QPCR. Deletion of p53 in bone marrow mesenchymal cells strongly abrogated the expression of several SASP cytokines. Interestingly several Notch target genes such as Hey1 and Hey2 were highly induced in MSCs following p53 deletion suggesting a role for Notch signaling in hematopoietic failure following AML induced MSCs senescence. Our data suggest that AML induces senescence of endosteal niche resulting in hematopoietic failure. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of p53 in leukemia MSCs and could have broad translational significance for the treatment of hematopoietic failure in patients with AML.Chen X, et al. (2015) Relation of clinical response and minimal residual disease and their prognostic impact on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 33(11):1258-1264.Li J, et al. (2018) Murine hematopoietic stem cell reconstitution potential is maintained by osteopontin during aging. Sci Rep 8(1):2833. Disclosures Andreeff: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer ; Celgene: Consultancy; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Reata: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Acute Myeloid Leukemia Expands Osteoprogenitor Rich Niche in the Bone Marrow but Resorbs Mature Bone Causing Osteopenia/Osteoporosis in Animal Models

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 86-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Yuan ◽  
Stanley Ly ◽  
Khoa Nguyen ◽  
Vivien Tran ◽  
Kiersten Maldonado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Surface ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Osteoprogenitor Cells ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Mature Bone

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most aggressive hematological malignancy that originates in the bone marrow (BM). Despite advances in the molecular characterization of AML, factors regulating its progression are still not known. Among several BM niches that support AML growth in the BM, the osteogenic niche has gained attention in recent years owing to its potential role in leukemogenesis. Genetic alterations in osteoprogenitor cells have been shown to induce myeloid leukemia in mouse models. We reported recently that AML cells induce osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the BM to facilitate faster AML engraftment in mice (Battula et al., JCI Insight, 2017). However specifics of this osteogenic niche generated by AML are not known. Here we hypothesize that AML expands osteo-progenitor rich niche in the BM, but that the mature bone is reduced. To determine the type of AML-induced osteo-lineage differentiation in the BM, we generated transgenic reporter mice by crossing Osx-CreERt2 mice with Ocn-GFP; ROSA-tdTomato mice. The resulting triple transgenic mice has the genotype of Osx-CreERt2;Ocn-GFP;ROSA-tdTomato. In these mice the tdTomato (red) positive cells represents osteo-lineage cells that originate from Osterix expressing (Osx+) cells, whereas a GFP+ cell represents an osteocalcin-expressing (Ocn+) mature osteoblast. Seven day old triple transgenic mice were injected with tamoxifen to activate Osx-CreERT2 to mark the Osx+ cells with tomato reporter. To investigate the osteogenic cell type that is induced by AML cells in the bone marrow, we implanted murine AML cells with MLL-ENL fusion proteins into Osx-CreERt2;Ocn-GFP;ROSA-tdTomato mice. Three weeks after implantation of AML cells, the femurs and tibia of these mice were dissected and subjected to histological evaluation using fluorescence microscopy. In control BM without AML, the GFP+ (Ocn+) cells were found in the trabecular bone surface as well as the periosteum of the bone, whereas the tdTomato+ (Osx+)cells were found in the marrow and the bone matrix; this suggests that some of the osteocytes originated from tamoxifen-induced Osx+ osteoprogenitor cells. Interestigly, in mice implanted with AML cells, we found a 3-4 fold increase in Osx+ cells in the marrow compared to normal BM (Fig 1A). However, the number of GFP+ cells on the endosteum and trabecular bone surface was reduced, suggesting that AML cells might expand osteoprogenitor cells but not fully differentiated mature osteoblasts. Next, to investigate whether AML cells affect the mature bone, AML PDX cells developed in our laboratory were implanted into NSG mice. The PDX models usually take 12-14 weeks to achieve >90% engraftment in the peripheral blood which provides ample time to observe alterations in bone composition. At this stage, the mice were subjected to computed tomography imaging to measure bone architecture, volume (BV), mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BVF). Interestingly, we observed large bone cavities close to epiphysis and metaphysis areas in the femur and tibia of mice with AML (Fig 1B). In addtion, BMD and BVF in these mice were reduced by 20-30% compared to control mice without leukemia. To validate the bone resorption in these mice, bone histomorphometric analysis was performed on femurs and tibias from mice with and without AML. Masson-Goldner's Trichrome staining revealed a 5- to 10-fold decrease in the trabecular and cortical bone thickness in AML femurs compared to normal femurs. Moreover, measurements of osteoclast activation by tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) revealed positive staining for osteoclasts on the endosteal surface and massive bone resorption in AML bone compared to normal bone. Mechanistic studies showed that AML cells inhibit osteoprotegerin (OPG) ~10 fold in MSCs, a factor that inhibits the RNAK ligand which in turn activates osteoclasts that breakdown the bone. In conclusion, our data suggest that bone homeostasis is dysregulated in AML by induction of osteogenic and osteolytic activities simultaneously. AML cells induce an osteoprogenitor niche but also activate osteoclasts resulting in osteopenia/osteoporosis in mouse models. In-depth analysis of bone remodeling in AML patients could result in new insights into the pathobiology of the disease and provide therapeutic avenues for AML. Disclosures Andreeff: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer ; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership. Battula:United Therapeutics Inc.: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Nascent Transcript and Single Cell Rnaseq Analysis Defines the Mechanism of Action of the LSD1 Inhibitor INCB059872 in Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2509-2509
Author(s):  
Gretchen Johnston ◽  
Haley E. Ramsey ◽  
Kristy Stengel ◽  
Shilpa Sampathi ◽  
Pankaj Acharya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloid Differentiation ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Upregulated Genes

Drugs targeting chromatin-modifying enzymes have entered clinical trials for myeloid malignancies, including INCB059872, a selective irreversible inhibitor of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1). LSD1 is a component of the CoREST complex, in which it associates with histone deacetylases 1 and 2, the transcriptional co-repressor, mSin3A or mSin3B, and the REST corepressor (RCOR1), so a role in gene expression was expected. While initial studies of LSD1 inhibitors have suggested these compounds may be used to induce differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia, the mechanisms underlying this effect and dose-limiting toxicities are not well understood. Here, we have used precision nuclear run-on sequencing (PROseq) and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) to show that INCB059872 de-represses GFI1/GFI1B-regulated genes to promote a myeloid differentiation gene signature in AML cells while stalling maturation of megakaryocyte progenitor cells. Within 3 days of treatment with INCB059872, the majority of THP-1, which contain an the MLL-translocation, undergo myeloid differentiation. RNAseq analysis indicated that 24h drug treatment upregulated genes involved in hematopoietic cell lineage, which is consistent with the differentiation. In addition, PROseq was used to measure the effects of INCB059872 on nascent transcription at genes and enhancers, as this is one of the best methods to define enhancer activity. In THP-1 cells after 24h treatment, there were 203 genes with at least a 1.5-fold increase in transcription, while there are nearly 1300 enhancers meeting this threshold. Upregulated genes include those associated with myeloid cell differentiation, such as CSF1R and CD86. Given that LSD1 catalyzes the removal of mono- and di-methyl marks from histone H3, we expected that INCB059872 would cause a buildup of histone methylation. Surprisingly, ChIPseq for H3K4me2 and H3K4me1 showed only subtle changes in these marks after 48h drug treatment in THP-1. Only a handful of LSD1i-induced enhancers overlapped with detectable changes in H3K4 methylation. However, our PROseq data is consistent with the increases in H3K27 acetylation seen with OG86 (a compound that disrupts the LSD1:GFI1 interaction) at GFI1 binding sites (PMID: 29590629). Indeed, motif analysis of INCB059872-upregulated enhancers identified the GFI1 recognition sequence as the most highly enriched. Moreover, siRNA inhibition of key components of LSD1-containing chromatin remodeling complexes pinpointed the CoREST complex as mediating the THP-1 myeloid differentiation effects of INCB059872. To investigate on-target thrombocytopenia seen with LSD1 inhibitors in preclinical studies, we analyzed the bone marrow of wild-type mice treated daily with INCB059872 for 0, 4, or 6 days before harvesting and sorting lin-bone marrow cells for scRNA-seq. Notably, one of the most highly upregulated genes in treated cells was Gfi1b. Unsupervised clustering identified 22 clusters, corresponding to unique subpopulations (Fig. 1A). While the distribution of cells into different progenitor populations was mostly unaffected by drug treatment, these data revealed a striking increase in the proportion of cells from treated mice assigned to a megakaryocyte stem/progenitor cluster. Cells within this expanded cluster expressed stem cell markers such as MYCN and PBX1, but also expressed VWF (Fig. 1B). Thus, LSD1 inhibition caused accumulation of megakaryopoiesis-biased stem cells that failed to mature into efficient platelet producers. Finally, we used scRNAseq to analyze bone marrow from an AML patient who responded to treatment with INCB059872 plus azacytidine (AZA). A pre-treatment bone marrow sample was divided into separate cultures to study the effects of INCB059872, AZA, or the combination. Remarkably, unsupervised clustering of patient cells assigned the majority of INCB059872 and combination-treated cells to clusters that were not found in control- or AZA-treated samples. Cells exposed to INCB059872 had upregulated GFI1 and GFI1B, as well as differentiation-related genes that were also observed in AML cell lines. Overall, these data indicate that INCB059872 affects gene expression with kinetics consistent with a loss of CoREST activity to stimulate differentiation of AML blasts, but the inactivation of GFI1/GFI1B impairs megakaryocyte maturation likely explaining thrombocytopenia seen in preclinical models. Disclosures Stubbs: Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Burn:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hiebert:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Savona:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Patents & Royalties; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A Phase I Trial of Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation (TMLI)-Based Transplant Conditioning in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 735-735
Author(s):  
Anthony Selwyn Stein ◽  
Jeffrey Y. C. Wong ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Margaret O'Donnell ◽  
David S. Snyder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Organ Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Extramedullary Disease ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Current hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) regimens for patients with relapsed refractory acute leukemia have 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) of 19% and 16% respectively. Previous studies demonstrated that intensification of total body irradiation (TBI) is not possible due to excessive regimen-related toxicity. Because image-guided targeted radiation therapy (e.g., total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI)) allows for the precise delivery of radiation through the sculpting of radiation to areas of high risk and disease burden, intensification of radiation dose to target structures as part of a HCT preparative may be possible without increased radiation-related toxicities or non-relapse mortality. Herein we report the results of a phase I trial that combines TMLI (1200-2000 cGy) with fixed doses of etoposide (VP16) and cyclophosphamide (CY); the primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose of TMLI. Methods: TMLI together with VP16 and CY before allogeneic HCT was assessed for patients with relapsed/refractory AML and ALL. TMLI was administered on days -10 to -6, VP16 60 mg/kg (adj bw) on day -5, and CY 100 mg/kg (ideal bw) on day -3. The initial radiation dose was 1200 cGy, delivered in 150 cGy fractions twice daily. The radiation dose was escalated in increments of 150 cGy, up to 1500 cGy, by use of a standard 3x3 design. At this point, the dose was raised in 100 cGy increments to a 2000 cGy maximum with a rolling 6 design. Bone marrow (n=3) or peripheral blood stem cells (n=48) were given on day 0. Tacrolimus and sirolimus were administered for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined according to the Bearman and CTCAE 3.0 scales, the latter for hematologic toxicity. The radiation dose delivered to the liver and brain was kept at 1200 cGy. Median normal organs received 16-60% of the dose (oral cavity 28%, lung 44%, esophagus 33%). Results: From 3/14/2008 to 1/30/2014, 51 patients underwent transplantation on this trial. (See table.) Our phase I trial/safety studies found the TMLI/CY/VP16 conditioning regimen to be well tolerated at TMLI doses up to 2000 cGy; 1-year estimates of non-relapse mortality and overall survival were 8.3% (95% CI: 2.6-18.4) and 54.4% (95% CI: 39.3-67.3) respectively (median follow-up: 23.5 months).Relapsed, progressed, or persistent disease after transplant occurred in 33 patients (bone marrow, 26; extramedullary disease, 6; concurrent bone marrow/extramedullary, 1). Of the 18 patients who were treated with a dose of 1700 cGy or higher, 17 achieved a complete remission at the day +30 evaluation. No radiological-based maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. We determined that the median organ dose at 2000 cGy would be lower than that seen for total body irradiation (TBI), but a higher dose may result in reaching or exceeding TBI organ dose levels. We therefore stopped at 2000 cGy, above which non-targeted organs may no longer be protected. Acute GVHD (aGVHD) developed in 28 (55%) of patients; of those 7 (14%) developed grades 3-4. The most common toxicities across the tested dose levels were grade 1 GI toxicity and grade 2 stomatitis. One patient (treated at 1500cGy) developed grade 3 stomatitis. No additional DLTs were experienced across all dose levels. Conclusion: A dose of 2000 cGy targeted to lymph nodes and marrow in combination with CY and VP16 can be safely administered in the context of related and unrelated HCT, using tacrolimus and sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. We did not see increased incidence of aGVHD, and the day +100 NRM rate was <5%. A phase II trial is currently being conducted. Table. Patient characteristics Variable Median (range) or N Age at transplant (yrs) 34 (16-57) Disease diagnosis AML ALL Ph- ALL Ph+ biphenotypic undifferentiated 3313221 Disease status at HSCT 1 RL 2 RL IF 14334 Cytogenetic risk (SWOG criteria) favorable intermediate unfavorable unknown significance 122199 KPS at HSCT 80 (60-100) Donor source sibling HLA matched unrelated mismatched (1 allele) unrelated 25521 WBC at HSCT 1.4 (0.1-14.9) % Blasts in blood at transplant* 4 (0-93) % Blasts in marrow at transplant* 52 (8-98) Extramedullary disease at time of HSCT 11 *Excludes patients with solely extramedullary disease, n=4 Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Snyder:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forman:Mustang: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Indatuximab Ravtansine (BT062) in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Activity in Patients Already Exposed to Lenalidomide and Bortezomib

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4736-4736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Kelly ◽  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Leonard T Heffner ◽  
George Somlo ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: BT062 (Biotest AG Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), comprising the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the maytansinoid DM4 as a cytotoxic agent. It is designed to bind to CD138 on cancer cells, and then release DM4 after internalization to cause cell death. CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly overexpressed on various solid tumors and in hematological malignancies, and represents one of the most specific target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. BT062 was investigated as a single agent and found to have an acceptable tolerability profile and evidence of activity in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory MM (1). Preclinical studies showed enhanced anti-MM activity when BT062 was combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len/Dex). Based on these data, a Phase I/IIa study in MM was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 in combination with Len/Dex. Objectives: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose (RPTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062 (days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) used in combination with Len (25 mg, daily on days 1-21) and low dose Dex (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, multicenter Phase I/IIa study. The Phase I part includes dose escalation, and the Phase IIa the expansion of the RPTD cohort. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed and/or refractory MM who have failed at least one prior therapy were eligible to participate. Prior treatment with Len and/or Dex was allowed. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for additional treatment cycles. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of at least 3 at each dose level; DLT in the first cycle triggered cohort expansion. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4 and clinical response was assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: The maximum administered dose (MAD) was 120 mg/m². Two of six patients treated at this dose had a DLT: mucosal inflammation (CTC grade 3) and anemia (CTC grade 3). The MTD was defined as 100 mg/m² and selected as RPTD. Additional patients are being treated at this RPTD to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Enrollment into the study is ongoing. As of July 2014, a total of 45 patients had received BT062 at dose levels of 80 mg/m² (N=3), 100 mg/m² (N=36) or 120 mg/m² (N=6). Fifteen patients discontinued study treatment: 5 for disease progression, 7 for adverse events, 1 died (not treatment related) and 2 for withdrawal of consent. The other 30 patients remain on treatment. The median treatment duration was 123 days (range 1–597). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–11). 68% of patients had prior exposure to both Len and bortezomib, 73% of patients had prior Len exposure, and 30% were Len-refractory. According to preliminary data from this ongoing study, about 89% of reported Adverse Events (AEs) were CTC grade 1 or 2. The most common reported AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and hypokalemia. Amongst the 36 patients across all dose levels currently evaluable for efficacy, the overall response rate (ORR) is 78%; including 1 stringent complete response, 2 complete responses, 10 very good partial responses, and 15 partial responses. Two patients achieved a minor response and 6 patients disease stabilization, resulting in a clinical benefit in 100% of the evaluable patients. The ORR was 83% among the 30 evaluable patients receiving the RPTD. Interestingly, the ORR was 70% among the 23 patients with prior exposure to Len and bortezomib, and among 10 patients refractory to prior treatment with Len. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this ongoing study indicate that BT062 is well tolerated in combination with Len/Dex at dose levels that induce responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, including patients with prior exposure to both Len and bortezomib and patients refractory to prior treatment with Len. Updated results on safety and efficacy will be presented. References Heffner et al, BT062, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Directed Against CD138, Given Weekly for 3 Weeks in Each 4 Week Cycle: Safety and Further Evidence of Clinical Activity. Blood. 2012; 120: Abstract 4042. Disclosures Kelly: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Heffner:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Research Funding; Dana Farber CI: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Talon Therapeutics: Research Funding. Somlo:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Ocopep: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Jagannath:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ailawadhi:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barmaki-Rad:Biotest AG: Employment. Chavan:Biotest Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Patel:Biotest Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document