Dynamo: A Phase 2 Study Demonstrating the Clinical Activity of Duvelisib in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract DYNAMO: A Phase 2 Study Demonstrating the Clinical Activity of Duvelisib in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Introduction: Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) is characterized by a relapsing clinical course with shorter responses to therapy after each relapse. Duvelisib is an oral dual inhibitor of PI3K-d,γ in development for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, including previously-treated iNHL. Data from a Phase 1 study of duvelisib indicate the potential for duvelisib to be an effective treatment for previously-treated iNHL, with an acceptable safety profile. DYNAMO is a Phase 2 study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of duvelisib in a previously-treated, refractory iNHL population. Methods: DYNAMO is an ongoing, open-label, single-arm, safety and efficacy study that includes adult patients (pts) diagnosed with follicular lymphoma (FL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) whose disease is refractory to rituximab and to a chemotherapy regimen (containing an alkylator or purine analogue) or radioimmunotherapy. Pts received duvelisib 25 mg twice daily (BID) in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or unacceptable tolerability. The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by an independent review committee, according to the revised IWG criteria. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to response (TTR), adverse events (AEs), and changes in safety laboratory values. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis was mandated for all patients. Here we present the results from the final analysis, with a data cut-off of 07 April 2016. Results: 129 iNHL pts received at least 1 dose of duvelisib, including 83 pts with FL, 28 with SLL, and 18 with MZL. The median duration of exposure was 6 months (range 0.4 - 23.8). The median age was 65 years, and 68% were male. The median time from initial diagnosis to the first dose of duvelisib was 4.5 years, and from last anticancer therapy was 3.5 months. Pts had received a median of 3 prior regimens (range 1 - 18), with 40% having received ≥ 4 regimens. 77% of patients had disease refractory to ≥ 2 regimens and 96% were refractory to their most recent regimen. 64% of patients previously received bendamustine, 80% of whom were refractory. The ORR was 46% (all PRs, 95% CI 37 - 55), with a median DoR of 9.9 months (95% CI 4.5 - 10.3). The median TTR was 1.9 months (range 1.4 - 11.7). With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI 5.8 - 11.3) with a 60% estimated probability of being alive and event-free at 6 months, and the median OS was 18.4 months (95% CI 15.7 - NE) with an estimated probability of survival of 74% at 12 months. 83% of pts experienced a reduction in tumor burden following treatment with duvelisib. The response rate across the disease subtypes was: 41% FL, 68% SLL, and 33% MZL (see Table). AEs were predominantly Grade 1-2. The most common ≥ Grade 3 AEs were transient cytopenias (neutropenia [28%], anemia [12%], and thrombocytopenia [13%]), and diarrhea (15%). 63% of pts had dose modifications (interruptions or reductions) due to AEs and 17% of pts discontinued due to an AE. AEs leading to duvelisib discontinuation in ≥ 2 pts included pneumonitis (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 2), and rash generalized (n = 2). Six pts had an AE with an outcome of death, four assessed as related to duvelisib (suspected viral infection, septic shock, and 2 severe cutaneous reactions [TEN and DRESS]). The incidence of ≥ Grade 3 infection was 20%. The incidence of pneumocystis was 0.8% (1 patient) and the incidence of CMV was 2.3% (3 subjects), none of which were fatal. Conclusions: In the Phase 2 DYNAMO study, duvelisib achieved meaningful clinical activity in a heavily pretreated and highly refractory iNHL population. The safety profile was acceptable, with the majority of AEs low grade (≤ Grade 2) and the majority of pts able to remain on duvelisib. These results suggest duvelisib has a favorable benefit-risk profile in this patient population and further development is ongoing. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Flinn: Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Miller:Infinity: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ardeshna:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Expenses, Research Funding. Assouline:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Zinzani:Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mayer:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Pettitt:Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Infinity: Research Funding. Tournilhac:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Crump:Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Santabarbara:Infinity: Consultancy. Shi:Infinity: Employment. Steelman:Infinity: Employment. Wagner-Johnston:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label Phase 2 Study Of Ofatumumab In Combination With a Novel AKT Inhibitor (Afuresertib) In Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4175.4175 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4175-4175

Author(s):

Christine I. Chen ◽

Susi Snitzler ◽

Trina Wang ◽

Harminder Paul ◽

Lisa W Le ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Treatment Phase ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Akt Inhibitor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Ofatumumab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which led to impressive single-agent responses of 47-58% in a phase 2 study of CLL patients (pts) with refractory disease (Wierda et al 2010). Unfortunately, response durations were short (median 5.6-7.1 mos). In order to improve upon these results, we combined ofatumumab with a novel pan-AKT kinase inhibitor, afuresertib (GSK2110183). The AKT pathway plays a centralized role in tumor differentiation, migration, proliferation and survival and is frequently aberrantly activated in CLL (Longo et al 2007). Single agent afuresertib is very well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity in relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies (Spencer et al ASH 2011). We present an interim analysis of the initial 19 of 31 planned pts in an ongoing trial of ofatumumab and afuresertib in relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods Previously treated CLL pts who have received at least one prior fludarabine-containing regimen with disease progression are eligible. During the initial 6 month Treatment Phase, ofatumumab 2000mg IV is administered weekly for 8 doses, then once every 4 week cycle for 4 doses (dose/schedule identical to the pivotal phase 2 trial) with afuresertib 125mg orally daily. An initial 10 day Lead-in Phase with afuresertib alone allows for evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) changes in phosphoproteins and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Pts are assessed for safety and response on day 1 of each cycle. Pts achieving SD, PR or CR by the end of the Treatment Phase proceed to the Maintenance Phase with single-agent afuresertib for a maximum of 12 mos (12 cycles). Results Demographics: To date, 19 pts have been enrolled. Median age is 65 yrs (range 43-76), baseline median Hb 108g/L (range 80-145), absolute lymphocytes 29.7 x109/L (range 1.0-464.9), β2M 4.42mg/L (range 1.42-3.21), bulky nodes ≥5cm in 5 pts (32%), organomegaly in 8 pts (42%), del17p/del11q on FISH in 9 pts (47%), and ZAP70+ in 13 pts (68%). Eight pts (42%) were fludarabine-refractory; only 2 pts had received prior alemtuzumab. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6). Toxicity: Hematologic: 4 pts (21%) developed Gr 3-4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle; 1 pt (5%) had a febrile neutropenia event. Only 2 pts (10.5%) have developed Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia, without bleeding. Nonhematologic toxicity: Most common related grade 3-4 toxicities were GI: dyspepsia (53%), diarrhea (37%), nausea (21%), temporally related to oral afuresertib and easily managed symptomatically. Infusion reactions to ofatumumab were frequent (12 pts; 63%) with grade 3 reactions in 3 pts. Five pts (26%) developed non-infectious pneumonitis, with 3 pts requiring hospitalization. Two pts with preexisting atrial arrhythmias sustained exacerbation with weekly ofatumumab infusions. Most infections were mild, with only 1 grade 3 cellulitis. Efficacy: Of the 19 response-evaluable pts receiving a median of 6 cycles (range 1-9), 8 pts (42%) have achieved a PR, 11 SD (58%), and no CR. Response onset was rapid at a median 0.9 mos (range 0.8-2.8). At a median follow-up of 6.8 mos (range 0.3-12.9 mos), 5 pts (26%) have progressed and one patient has died after cycle 1 on therapy due to progressive CLL. PD Studies: CD19+ cells are assayed for phosphorylated AKT and its downstream targets RAS40 and GSK3 in addition to phospho-proteins of alternative pathways including ERK and pS6 by multiplexed phospho-flow cytometry. Peripheral blood samples are collected at screening and on cycle 1 day 10, after dosing with afuresertib. Of the 7 patients evaluated thus far, 5 demonstrated constitutive AKT phosphorylation at baseline. Partial inhibition of AKT signaling evidenced by increased phosphorylation of AKT and inhibition of GSK3 and/or RAS40 phosphorylation in response to BCR stimulation was observed post-treatment, indicating target engagement by afuresertib. PK Studies: Afuresertib exposure (Cmax and AUC) was similar when afuresertib was administered alone or in combination with ofatumumab. Conclusion Preliminary results from this phase 2 study suggests that a combination of ofatumumab plus a novel oral AKT inhibitor, afuresertib, has activity in previously treated CLL and is generally well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity. Response data are encouraging but whether durable responses can be achieved requires more mature follow-up. Disclosures: Chen: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Off-label use of ofatumumab and afuresertib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL. Smith:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Johnston:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib May Be Safely Combined with Y-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular or Transformed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Phase I Trial of Combined Induction Therapy and Bortezomib Consolidation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1749.1749 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1749-1749

Author(s):

Rupali Roy ◽

Andrew M Evens ◽

David P. Patton ◽

Annette Larsen ◽

Alfred Rademaker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Ibritumomab Tiuxetan ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1749 Background: Preclinical studies suggest that bortezomib, through inhibition of NF-kB activation, may act as a radiosensitizer and enhance the effects of radioimmunotherapy. Methods: This phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bortezomib induction combined with Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients 18 years or older with relapsed/refractory follicular or transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In addition, we assessed the tolerability of weekly bortezomib consolidation following induction therapy. Cohorts consisting of three patients each were treated with bortezomib induction at doses of 1.0, 1.3, or 1.6 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, rituximab 250 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15, and Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan 0.4 mCi/kg on day 15. Consolidation, consisting of bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of three 28 day cycles, was initiated on day 71 after recovery of the platelet count to 100,000/uL and ANC> 1,000/uL. At least three patients per cohort were followed for 7 weeks or had recovery of blood counts without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) before dose escalation was allowed. MTD was defined as the dose previous to that in which two patients had DLTs. To be evaluable, patients were required to have received at least two doses of bortezomib and the Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapeutic dose. Response was assessed by CT scanning following induction therapy and PET/CT and diagnostic CT scans after completion of consolidation. Results: Nine patients with a median age of 55 (range: 29–71) were treated with bortezomib combined with Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan. Eight patients had FL and one had evidence of a transformation to diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma. All had a performance status of 0 or 1, and all had been previously treated with rituximab either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. All but one had received prior chemotherapy [R-CHOP (n=7), chlorambucil (n=1), or R-CVP (n=2)], and three had received radiotherapy. Only one had bone marrow involvement. The median number of prior therapies was one (range: 1–3). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in all but one of the patients and as expected, all but one of these toxicities were hematologic (leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and/or thrombocytopenia). One patient had grade 3 cardiotoxicity characterized by palpitations and shortness of breath on day 15 of her first consolidation, with PVC's noted on subsequent EKG. Though uncommon, cardiotoxicity has been reported in association with bortezomib in the form of systolic heart failure, arrhythmias, and angina. It should be noted that this patient was previously treated with an anthracycline as have the majority of patients reported to have experienced cardiotoxicity in association with bortezomib. A DLT of grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than ten days was observed in two of three patients treated with bortezomib at 1.6 mg/m2. One of these two patients was the only one to receive .3 mCi/kg rather than .4 mCi/kg of the radioisotope because of thrombocytopenia on the day of treatment. Thus, the MTD of bortezomib was 1.3 mg/m2. All patients are alive, and the median followup for those patients who have not progressed is 6.5 months (range: 3 – 15 mo.). All but one patient responded to therapy (4 CR/CRu, 4PR, 1 SD). The four complete responders remain in remission at 3.0, 5.0, 5.0 and 15.0 months. All of the partial responders have progressed (3.5, 3.5, 11.5, and 17.5 months), as has the patient with stable disease (5.0 months). Conclusions: The MTD for weekly bortezomib combined with Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan induction therapy is 1.3 mg/m2. Consolidation with bortezomib at 1.6 mg/m2 was well tolerated in this group of relapsed/refractory follicular and transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Nearly all patients responded. A phase II trial at the MTD is underway to better define the toxicity and effectiveness of this regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory FL. Disclosures: Evens: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ziopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Research Funding; Ortho- Biotec: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gordon:Cure Tech, Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Winter:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer/Wyeth: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results From RETRIEVE, a Prospective International Phase 2 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3866.3866 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3866-3866 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Igor W. Blau ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Johannes Drach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bortezomib Treatment ◽

Best Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3866 Poster Board III-802 Bortezomib (Velcade®) retreatment has been shown to be active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) in a number of retrospective studies and a small prospective phase 4 study (EVEREST). This large, prospective, international, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib in MM patients who had previously responded (at least partial response [PR]) to bortezomib-based therapy as their most recent prior treatment. Patients had to have previously tolerated bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 alone or in combination and have had a treatment-free interval (TFI; time from last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of bortezomib retreatment) of ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria included progressive disease or relapse from complete response (CR) by EBMT criteria, no MM therapy (except maintenance with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or interferon) since the last dose of initial bortezomib treatment, KPS ≥60, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain (as defined by NCI CTCAE v3.0) were excluded. Patients received bortezomib at the last tolerated dose (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) during initial treatment on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone at the investigator's discretion. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria every 6 weeks during treatment and then every 2 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v3.0. A total of 130 patients received at least 1 dose of bortezomib retreatment and were included in the safety population. Patients had a median age of 67 years, 57% were male, and 16% had KPS '70%. Median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years); median number of prior therapies was 2; 15, 80, 23, and 12 patients had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib therapy). Best response by EBMT criteria to initial bortezomib treatment was CR in 26% and PR in 74% of patients; median time to progression and TFI after initial bortezomib treatment were 17.9 months and 14.3 months, respectively. Last tolerated dose of previous bortezomib therapy was 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 for 62% and 29% of patients, respectively; 9% received another dose. Patients received a median 7.0 (range 1–8) cycles of bortezomib retreatment (23% of patients completed all 8 cycles); 72% of patients received concomitant dexamethasone. A total of 126 patients were evaluable for response. In the 126 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) by best confirmed response (EBMT criteria) was 40%; in addition, 18% of patients achieved minimal response (MR), to give a CR+PR+MR rate of 58%. After a planned secondary efficacy analysis, the ORR (CR+PR) by single best response was 55% (75% ≥MR). Median time to best confirmed response (≥MR) was 2.9 months; time to first response was 1.5 months. Analysis of ORR by patient subgroups showed comparable results in patients who did versus did not receive concomitant dexamethasone (42% vs 32%), in those who received ≤1.0 mg/m2 vs 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (35% vs 41%), and in those aged ≤65 years vs >65 years (45% vs 36%). ORR was 67%, 39%, 33%, and 25% in patients who had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib), respectively. Analysis of best confirmed responses according to response to initial bortezomib showed that 63% and 52% of patients who achieved a CR or PR, respectively, to initial bortezomib treatment responded to retreatment. Most (98%) patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE; 60% experienced a grade 3/4 AE, and 32% experienced a serious AE; there were 8 deaths, 2 of which (due to sepsis and stroke) were possibly treatment-related. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), and pneumonia (5%). AEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuations were reported for 22% and 12% of patients, respectively. The incidence of neuropathy was 39%, including 9% grade 3; 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to PN; 61% of neuropathy events resolved or improved within a median 1.3 months. These results confirm that bortezomib retreatment is a well-tolerated, feasible, and active therapeutic option for heavily pretreated MM patients without evidence of cumulative toxicity. Disclosures: Petrucci: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Drach:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Study of Nilotinib 400 Mg Twice Daily in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Accelerated Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Results after 5.7 Years of Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-120155 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3011-3011 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lucia Masarova ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Keyur P. Patel ◽

Susan M. O'Brien ◽

Graciela M. Nogueras González ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract OBJECTIVES Nilotinib is a potent, second generation inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase (TKI) and represent a standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including accelerated phase (AP-CML). In 2005, we initiated a phase 2 study of nilotinib 400 mg twice daily as a frontline therapy in patients with AP-CML, and herein present the efficacy and safety data after a median follow-up of 68.4 months (range, 0.3-124.8). METHODS This was a prospective, single institution, phase 2 study in patients of age ≥18 years with a newly diagnosed, untreated AP-CML (except for <1 month of previous imatinib) defined according to MD Anderson criteria (Kantarjian, 1988). Patients were treated with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID). Data are presented on an intention to treat analysis with a cutoff date of June 30st, 2018. Response criteria are standard. Fisher exact test and χ2 were used for analysis of categorical variables; and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time to events (e.g., overall survival, event free survival) was calculated from the date of treatment to the date of an event or to last follow-up as previously reported (Cortes et al, 2010). RESULTS Twenty two patients of a median age of 53.7 years (range, 26-79.7) were enrolled. Table 1 summarizes clinical characteristics of all patients. The median treatment duration was 47.3 months (range; 0.3-124.4), and the median follow-up 68.4 months (range, 0.3-124.8). All patients discontinued study as of January 2017 due to planned study closure; but 11 patients (50%) continued on nilotinib off protocol at data cut-off (400 mg BID [3]; 300 mg BID [2]; and 200 mg BID [6]). Median time to treatment discontinuation in the remaining 11 patients was 12.9 months (range, 0.3-112); reason for discontinuation was: inadequate response [3], toxicity [2], non-compliance/financial [4]; elective discontinuation after sustained MR4.5 >2 years [1]; and death due to stroke [1]. Sixteen patients (73%) achieved complete hematologic response (CHR). Overall rates of CCyR, MMR, MR4.5 and CMR (undetectable transcripts with at least 100,000 ABL copies) were 73%, 73%, 55%, and 41%, respectively. Median times to CCyR, MMR, and MR4.5 were 2.9 months (range, 2.7-6.4), 5.7 months (range, 2.7-99.2) and 6.0 months (range, 2.7-36), respectively. Seven patients (32%) achieved sustained MR4.5 >2 years. In total, 4 patients lost their best achieved response (CHR [1], CCyR [2] and MR4.5 [1]) while on study. All events were associated with acquired ABL domain mutation; Y253H [2], T315I [1], and F359I [1] with a median time to detection of 16.7 months (range, 7-40). During the study conduct, one patient progressed to blast phase after 2 months on nilotinib. Two patients died while on study, one due to stroke and one due to unrelated medical condition, after being on therapy for 3 and 0.4 months, respectively. One patient electively discontinued nilotinib after being in sustained MR4.5 for 107 months, and remains in MR4.5 after 6 months off therapy. Estimated overall survival and event free survival at 5 years were 84% and 70%, respectively (Figures 1a & 1b). On univariate analysis, age >55 years was associated with lower rate of MMR (p = 0.034; HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.92); MR4 (p = 0.013; HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.75); and MR4.5 (p = 0.01; HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.63). Overall survival was inferior in patients older than 55 years (p = 0.014; HR 2.4; 95% CI 2.36-not estimated); and in those with > 1 AP-CML defining abnormality (p = 0.018; HR 9.53; 95% CI 0.98-92). The most frequent non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were hyperbilirubinemia (63% of patients), rash (63%), hypertension (59%), and transaminitis (50%). Grade ≥3 AEs observed in more than one patient were hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and transaminitis (=2). Two patients developed arterio-thrombotic AEs: stroke and myocardial infarction (one each). Hematologic AEs included (all grades; grade ≥3): anemia (36%; 9%), thrombocytopenia (32%; 14%) and neutropenia (14%; 9%). Two patients (9%) discontinued therapy due to nilotinib related AE, one for G3 peripheral neuropathy and one for G3 hyperbilirubinemia with G2 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION Nilotinib is safe and highly effective in patients with AP-CML, and induces fast and durable responses. More than 50% of patients can achieve MR4.5. Clinical trial.gov: NCT00129740. Disclosures Cortes: novartis: Research Funding. O'Brien:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences Inc.: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kadia:Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ravandi:Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The MP0250-CP201 Mirror Study: A Phase 2 Study Update of MP0250 Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Previously Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129827 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1899-1899 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Norbert Grząśko ◽

Stefan Knop ◽

Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽

Marc S Raab ◽

Jan Dürig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Proteasome Inhibitors ◽

Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Background Bone marrow neovascularization is a hallmark of multiple myeloma and progression is associated with a substantial increase in pro-angiogenic factors that promote bone marrow angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). At present, anti-angiogenic agents are not part of treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, neither alone nor in combination with approved agents. MP0250 is a first-in-class, tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-A and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase plasma half-life. This is a report on early safety and efficacy of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd) in RRMM patients that have previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM (MiRRoR, NCT03136653). Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarkers for HGF and cMET in bone marrow biopsies are detected by IHC; MM specific markers, circulating HGF and VEGF levels are measured using patient plasma samples. Results As of 01 July 2019, 20 patients (7 ongoing) received a total of 137 doses (1-33 cycles) of MP0250 at the maximum tolerated dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Vd. Median age was 61 years (46-76), median time since diagnosis was 6.7 years. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-9). All 20 patients had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 9 patients received PI-based regimens as their immediate prior line of therapy before start of MP0250 + Vd. Importantly, 6 out of these 9 patients achieved responses ≥ Partial Response (PR). Treatment had been discontinued in 40% of patients due to PD, 15% due to Adverse Event (AE), 5% due to physician's decision and in 1 case at patient's request. The most frequent drug-related grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension in 7/1 patients, thrombocytopenia in 4/1 patients, grade 3 proteinuria in 4 patients and grade 3 anemia in 4 patients. There were no infusion-related reactions. No treatment-related deaths were reported. 20 patients received ≥ 1 dose of MP0250 + Vd and had at least 1 assessment of response and were included in the efficacy analysis. 1 patient (5%) achieved Complete Response, 4 patients achieved Very Good Partial Response (20%) and 3 patients achieved PR (15%) for an ORR of 40%. DOR at cutoff date is 6 months (range, 2-21). Pharmacokinetic data show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days (range, 6-17). No indication of ADA-mediated drug clearance was observed. Summary Combining MP250 at 8 mg/kg with standard doses of bortezomib and dexamethasone was generally well tolerated with discontinuation due to AE in only 15% of patients. No unexpected toxicity was observed and AEs consistent with the toxicity profile of the individual agents. Analysis of the preliminary efficacy results showed an encouraging ORR of 40%. Recruitment to this Phase 2 study is ongoing. Disclosures Knop: Janssen, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dürig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel or accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Bringhen:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gamberi:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lang:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VTD) Versus VTD Plus Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients Eligible for HDT-ASCT: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2312.2312 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2312-2312 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Luisa Viterbo ◽

Richard Greil ◽

Tamas Masszi ◽

Ivan Spicka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2312 Poster Board II-289 Bortezomib (Velcade®) has shown substantial activity and manageable toxicity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with thalidomide (Thalomid®) and dexamethasone (VTD) in a phase 3 study (Cavo et al, ASH 2008), and with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) in a phase 2 study (Knop et al, ASCO 2009). Four-drug combinations may be more effective than 3-drug regimens, but may also be associated with increased toxicity. This randomized, non-comparative, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VTD and VTD plus cyclophosphamide (VTDC) as induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy plus autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT). A total of 98 previously untreated MM patients with measurable disease who were candidates for HDT-ASCT were enrolled. Additional eligibility criteria included: age 18–70 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60%, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, and no grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN)/neuropathic pain. Patients were randomized (1:1), stratified by International Staging System (ISS) disease stage (I / II / III), to receive four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, thalidomide 100 mg daily, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 9–12 (VTD), or VTD plus cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, as induction therapy prior to HDT-ASCT. All patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis. Patients who became ineligible for HDT-ASCT or had a complete response (CR) after induction therapy could receive an additional 4 cycles of treatment. Responses were categorized using modified IMWG Uniform Response Criteria (stringent CR [sCR] were unconfirmed by immunohistochemistry) through blinded review by the principal investigator and medical monitor, using central laboratory M-protein data and local bone marrow data. The primary efficacy endpoint was combined CR rate (sCR + CR + near-CR) following induction therapy. Secondary objectives included combined CR rate post-HDT-ASCT, overall response rate (ORR: ≥partial response) post-induction and post-HDT-ASCT, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Forty nine patients were randomized to each arm; median age was 57 and 58 years in the VTD and VTDC arms, respectively, 53% and 51% of patients were male, 49% and 43% had KPS ≤80%, and 24 / 45 / 31% and 18 / 47 / 35% had ISS stage I / II / III MM. All but 7 patients completed induction; these patients discontinued due to AEs (3 [6%] each arm) and disease progression (1 [2%] VTDC). Four VTDC patients received additional cycles of treatment. One patient (VTDC arm) was not evaluable for response. Response rates following induction are shown in the table. Median CD34+ stem cell yields were 8.16 (VTD; n=48) and 8.13 (VTDC; n=40) x 106/kg. At data cut-off (April 10, 2009), 47 VTD and 35 VTDC patients had undergone HDT-ASCT; response rates post-HDT-ASCT in 38 and 27 evaluable patients are shown in the table. Time-to-event data are not mature (median follow-up: 9.8 months). The 1-year survival rate was estimated to be 94% in each arm. At least one AE was reported in 98% and 96% of patients on the VTD and VTDC arms, with at least one grade ≥3 AE reported in 47% and 59%, respectively. The most common non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (2% and 8%) and constipation (6% and 2%); analyses of hematology laboratory values indicated grade 3/4 AEs of lymphopenia (39% and 77%), anemia (8% and 18%), neutropenia (14% and 18%), and thrombocytopenia (6% each). PN was reported in 35% (VTD) and 29% (VTDC) of patients, including 8% grade 3 in each arm and 2% grade 4 in the VTD arm. Two patients (1 [2%] each arm) had deep vein thrombosis; one (VTDC arm) was a grade 3 SAE. At least one serious AE (SAE) was reported in 22% (VTD) and 41% (VTDC) of patients, including 6% and 14% with SAEs of infections (MedDRA SOC), and 2% and 14% with musculoskeletal-related pain. In conclusion, both VTD and VTDC are highly active induction regimens, with CR rates and ORRs among the highest reported; the efficacy profiles were similar between the arms, but there were higher rates of toxicity in the VTDC arm compared with the VTD arm. Table. Response rates following induction and post-HDT-ASCT. Post-induction n=49 n=48 Combined CR*, % 51 44 sCR†, % 27 27 ORR, % 100 96 Post-HDT-ASCT n=38 n=27 Combined CR*, % 76 78 sCR, % 39 33 ORR, % 100 100 * sCR + CR + near-CR † unconfirmed Disclosures: Ludwig: Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech : Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Masszi:Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hajek:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Dmoszynska:Milllennium: Research Funding. Cakana:Janssen Cilag: Employment, Equity Ownership. Enny:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2737.2737 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2737-2737 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Naokuni Uike ◽

Michinora Ogura ◽

Yoshitaka Imaizumi ◽

Norio Asou ◽

Atae Utsunomiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2737 Introduction: ATL is prevalent in Japan and has the worst prognosis among T-cell malignancies. PTCL also has a poor prognosis with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens, and both would benefit from better treatment modality. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity, and is approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone after at least 1 prior therapy and for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 5q deletion. We conducted a phase 1 study of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed ATL or PTCL to establish the recommended dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed advanced ATL or PTCL. Dose-escalation was conducted according to the standard 3+3 design. Up to one PTCL patient was allowed to be included in each cohort of 3 patients. Patients in Cohort 1 received oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received 25 and 35 mg/day, respectively, on each day of the 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia lasting 5 or more days; thrombocytopenia (platelets <10,000/uL or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion); ALT/AST elevation of Grade 4 or that of Grade 3 lasting 7 or more days; and/or clinically unacceptable Grade 3 or higher other non-hematological adverse events (AEs). Treatment was continued until the development of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). Response was assessed by internationally accepted standard criteria for ATL and PTCL. Results: From July 2010–June 2012, 13 Japanese patients (9 ATL and 4 PTCL; age 32–74 years [median, 64]; 1–11 prior therapies [median, 1]) were enrolled: 3 in Cohort 1, 6 in Cohort 2, and 4 in Cohort 3. The 3 patients in Cohort 1 received lenalidomide for 21, 103, and 637 days, respectively, until PD with no instances of DLT. In Cohort 2, 1 patient experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL) and 4 patients received lenalidomide for 37, 56, 138, and 387 days, respectively, until PD in 3 patients and unrelated death in one. The sixth patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 28+ days without a DLT. In Cohort 3, 2 patients had DLTs (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL in one patient and Grade 3 prolongation of QTc interval in one patient on concomitant fluconazole with preexisting cardiac disease and grade 1 QTc prolongation at baseline), 1 patient received lenalidomide for 71 days before withdrawal of consent, and 1 patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 323+ days without a DLT. Based on these results, 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle was regarded as the MTD. Other Grade 3/4 non-DLT AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included neutropenia (n=8), lymphocytopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=3), skin rash (n=3), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and increased ALT/AST (n=2). Among the 9 ATL patients, 3 achieved partial responses (PR) with hematological complete response in 2 patients, including the disappearance of skin lesions in 1 patient. These responses occurred between 54 and 57 days, and lasted for 92, 279+ and 505 days. Among the 4 PTCL patients, 1 achieved a PR at day 106 with >75% reduction in lymph nodes, which lasted for 282 days. PK profiles of patients in the study were generally consistent with that observed in Japanese MM patients. Plasma exposure of lenalidomide increased with increasing dose with a mean Cmax on Day 1 for 25 mg and 35 mg of 493 ng/mL and 628 ng/mL, respectively, and a mean AUC24 of 2774 ng/mL and 3062 ng/mL, respectively. There was no evidence of accumulation following multiple dosing for 8 days. Conclusions: This phase 1 study identified lenalidomide 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle as the dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study in patients with ATL or PTCL. Based on the preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ATL and PTCL patients, a phase 2 study in patients with relapsed ATL in Japan is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide (CC-5013) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult ATL patients. Tobinai:Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomedics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Chugai/Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ixazomib and Daratumumab without Dexamethasone (I-Dara) in Elderly Frail RRMM Patients. a Multicenter Phase 2 Study (IFM 2018-02) of the Intergroupe Francophone Du Myélome (IFM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148152 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 83-83

Author(s):

Magaret Macro ◽

Cyrille Touzeau ◽

Clara Mariette ◽

Salomon Manier ◽

Sabine Brechignac ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Frail Patients ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Frailty Score

Abstract Purpose: Frail patients with multiple myeloma have an inferior outcome, especially in the relapse setting. This adverse prognosis is mainly related to a high discontinuation rate due to treatment related adverse events. The aim of this phase 2 study is to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of Ixazomib-Daratumumab (I-Dara) without Dexamethasone in elderly frail patients with relapsed myeloma (NCT03757221). Methods: Fifty Ixa-Dara naïve RRMM patients (1-2 prior therapy) were planned to receive oral Ixa (4 mg: days 1, 8, 15), IV Dara (16 mg/kg; days 1, 8, 15, 22, cycles 1-2; days 1, 15, cycles 3-6; days 1, cycles 7+) and IV Methylprednisolone before Dara (100 mg at day 1, 8, cycle 1 and then 60 mg). They were enrolled if frailty score was ≥2 by IMWG score and FIRST proxy score (Facon T et al, Leukemia, 2020). The primary endpoint was ≥very good partial response rate at one year. Secondary endpoints included ORR, PFS, OS & toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE version 5.0. Results: Among 52 patients screened during this ongoing trial, 44 were included between 03/2018 and 05/2021. Patient were at first (n=28) or second relapse (n=16). Thirty -eight patients (86%) were previously exposed to bortezomib and 8 (18%) were previously refractory to lenalidomide. Median age was 82 (80-84). All patients had a frailty score ≥2. In 22 patients ISS was stage I (n=5), II (n=10) or III (n=7). Eleven (32%) patients harbored high-risk cytogenetic, including t(4;14) (n=3) or del17p (n=8). The median duration of Tx among 23 pts with ongoing Tx was 6 months [0-27] at data cutoff (July 19)]. The median duration of Tx among 21 pts who stopped Tx was 7 months [0-21]: 13 had progressive disease. Six patients died during the study: Daratumumab-related bronchospasm (D1C1); Ixazomib-related overdose (C2); progressive disease (C2 & C4), sepsis (C1 & C2). Regarding toxicity, 28 ≥grade 3 AE occurred amongst 24 pts (54%). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (n=5), other cytopenias (n=4), infection (n=4) and gastrointestinal disorders (n=2). Fourteen out of 28 were SAE including 1 bronchospasm, 1 acute respiratory failure and 2 ixazomib overdoses. Overall response rate, including minimal response, was 86 % in pts with ongoing treatment and 71% in pts who stopped Tx; ≥VGPR rate was 33% and 6% respectively. Conclusions: These preliminary results show a favorable safety profile of ixazomib and daratumumab combination, without dexamethasone, in this specific population of very elderly frail patients with RRMM and high risk cytogenetic for almost one third of them. Efficacy results will be analyzed when the 50 patients will be enrolled in the study and evaluable for the primary endpoint. Disclosures Macro: GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgen/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel accomodation, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel accomodation, Research Funding. Manier: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Vincent: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Decaux: Amgen BMS Celgene Janssen Sanofi Takeda: Honoraria. Leleu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Carsgen Therapeutics Ltd: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib and Daratumumab association is not approved in NDMM or in RRMM

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of MLN4924, a Novel NAE Inhibitor, in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1854.1854 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1854-1854 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jatin J Shah ◽

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

Owen A O’Connor ◽

Robert Z Orlowski ◽

Molly Patterson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Whole Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1854 Poster Board I-880 Background: MLN4924 is a first-in-class small molecule inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE), an essential component of the NEDD8 conjugation pathway in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Inhibition of NAE with MLN4924 prevents conjugation of NEDD8 to the Cullin Ring Ligases (CRLs). This subsequently prevents ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of CRL substrates, which include proteins involved in cell cycle regulation (p27), signal transduction (pIκBá), DNA replication (Cdt-1), stress response (Nrf-2), and other processes important to tumor cell growth and survival. MLN4924 has demonstrated potent antitumor activity in vitro against multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cell lines as well as in mouse xenograft models of NHL. This phase 1 dose-escalation study is the first investigation of MLN4924 in MM or NHL patients (pts). The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of MLN4924, describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in blood (inhibition of NEDD8-Cullin levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]; Nrf-2 target gene transcription in whole blood), and investigate PD effects in skin (Cdt-1, Nrf-2 accumulation). Methods: Pts aged ≥18 yrs with relapsed and/or refractory MM or NHL after ≥2 prior lines of therapy were eligible. Pts received escalating doses of MLN4924 by IV infusion on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of 21-day cycles; once the MTD for this schedule was reached, MTDs for other schedules will be investigated. MTD determination was based on an adaptive approach using a Bayesian continual reassessment method, with the MTD defined as the dose level closest to that predicted to result in a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25%. DLT was defined as: grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia for >7 days; grade 3 neutropenia with fever/infection or thrombocytopenia with bleeding; grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity except arthralgia/myalgia, brief fatigue, or fever without neutropenia; and grade ≥2 MLN4924-related toxicities requiring dose reduction/discontinuation. For PD analysis, PBMCs and whole blood were isolated at screening, baseline, and following MLN4924 administration; skin biopsies for Cdt-1 and Nrf-2 assays were performed at baseline and after the second dose. Results: Among 22 pts enrolled to date, median age was 65 years, 13 were male, 14 had MM, and 8 had NHL (4 FL, 1 MCL, 1 DLBCL, 1 B-cell CLL/SLL, 1 transformed CLL). All MM pts had received prior autologous SCT, and 13, 9, and 9 had prior bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide, respectively. Seven NHL pts had received prior autologous SCT, 1 had a prior allogeneic SCT, and 8 had prior rituximab. Pts received MLN4924 at 6 dose levels: 25 (n=3), 50 (n=2), 65 (n=3), 83 (n=2), 110 (n=9), and 147 mg/m2 (n=3). Of the 15 (68% of the 22 enrolled) pts who received all 4 scheduled doses or had a DLT in cycle 1 (DLT-evaluable pts), 4 experienced a DLT: 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia at 65 mg/m2; 1 grade 3 liver function tests at 110 mg/m2, and 1 grade 4 muscle cramps and 1 grade 2 myalgia that was considered dose limiting at 147 mg/m2. Thus, the MTD for this schedule was determined to be 110 mg/m2. The most common adverse events (AEs, NCI CTCAE v3.0) included fatigue, nausea, myalgia, and elevated liver enzymes. With the exception of the grade 4 neutropenia seen at 65 mg/m2, myelosuppression was limited. No infusion-related reactions were noted. Elevated CRP levels appeared transient in most cases. There have been no treatment-related deaths; 1 MM pt died due to progressive disease. MLN4924 displayed a multiexponential PK profile with a half life of 4–9 hours, relatively low PK variability, and approximately dose-proportional increases in total plasma exposure over the 25–147 mg/m2 dose range. NEDD8-Cullin levels in PBMCs were inhibited and Nrf-2 target gene transcripts in whole blood were higher vs baseline after MLN4924 administration, indicative of NAE inhibition. Cdt-1 and Nrf-2 levels in skin increased above baseline following the second dose of MLN4924, indicative of NAE inhibition in peripheral tissue. The 110 mg/m2 dose level is being expanded to more fully characterize safety, PK, and PD in MM and NHL. Subsequent pts will be enrolled to receive MLN4924 on 2 other schedules. Conclusions: This early analysis provides evidence of PD inhibition of NAE activity by MLN4924 in blood and skin, and supports continued investigation of MLN4924. Disclosures: Shah: Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: MLN4924 is not approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma.. Jakubowiak:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Berger:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Mulligan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Petruzzelli:Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Pickard:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Smith:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Venkatakrishnan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

PX-171-004, An Ongoing Open-Label, Phase II Study of Single-Agent Carfilzomib (CFZ) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Myeloma (MM); Updated Results From the Bortezomib-Treated Cohort.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.303.303 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 303-303 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

David Siegel ◽

Luhua Wang ◽

Robert Z Orlowski ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

A. Keith Stewart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Insufficiency ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Ortho Biotech ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 303 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a novel proteasome inhibitor that binds its target selectively and irreversibly, resulting in greater and more sustained proteasomal inhibition compared to BTZ (Demo et al, Cancer Res 2007). CFZ overcomes BTZ-resistance in vitro (Kuhn et al, Blood 2007) and in a previous Phase 2 study (PX-171-003), single-agent CFZ achieved durable responses and maintained disease control [e.g. ≥ Stable Disease (SD)] in patients with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) despite treatment with essentially all available agents. PX-171-004 is an ongoing Phase 2 study of CFZ monotherapy in MM patients with relapsed or refractory disease following 1–3 prior therapies. Here we report updated data for the BTZ-treated cohort. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory (defined as < 25% response or disease progression during therapy) MM were enrolled and stratified based on prior BTZ exposure (e.g. BTZ-naïve and BTZ-treated). For the BTZ-treated cohort, tolerability and response to prior BTZ [≥ Minor Response (MR)] was not required. CFZ 20 mg/m2 IV was administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 every 28 days, for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was Overall Response Rate (ORR) [≥ Partial Response (PR)] by IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Benefit Response (CBR = ORR + MR) and safety. Results: Thirty-five BTZ-treated patients were enrolled. Six (17%) patients had previously received BTZ exclusively as a single agent, 15 (43%) received BTZ as part of a chemotherapy combination and 10 (29%) received BTZ as part of a stem cell transplant (SCT) regimen. An additional 4 (11%) received BTZ in a chemotherapy combination as well as part of a separate transplant regimen. Other prior therapies included alkylators (89%), SCT (81%), thalidomide (69%), lenalidomide (37%), and anthracyclines (31%). Six (17%) patients had disease refractory to BTZ and 9 (26%) additional patients had discontinued BTZ due to toxicities. At baseline, 19 (54 %) patients had an ECOG score ≥ 1, 17 (49%) patients had neuropathy of Grade ≥ 1, 9 (26%) patients had impaired renal function (CrCl <60 mL/min) and 9 (26%) had diabetes. The median time since diagnosis was 3.6 years (range 1.2–13.2). To date, the mean number of CFZ doses administered was 29.3 (∼5 four-week cycles; range 4–72 doses, 0.7–12 cycles). Thirty-three patients who initiated therapy were evaluable for response per protocol. The ORR was 18% (6/33), including 1 CR and 5 PRs. An additional 4 (12%) patients had MR (CBR= 30%) and 13 (39%) had SD for ≥ 6 weeks. For evaluable patients who were either refractory or intolerant to their prior BTZ therapy, responses to CFZ included 1 PR and 1 MR and 8 SDs. The most common adverse events (AEs) (≥ 30% patients) were primarily Grades 1/2 and included fatigue (57%), nausea (54%), vomiting (37%), dyspnea (34%), diarrhea (34%), anemia (31%), increased creatinine (31%) and upper respiratory tract infection (31%). Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥ 10% of patients were anemia (14.3%) and neutropenia (11.4%). There were no reports of febrile neutropenia. Dose modifications were rarely required. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was uncommon (4 patients, 11%); only 1 patient had a Grade 3 event that lasted < 36 hours and did not result in missed doses or dose modification. None of the 9 patients with baseline renal impairment were discontinued for renal AEs. To date, 6 (17%) patients have completed the full 12-cycle protocol at the initial dose and schedule, 6 (17%) remain on study and 1 patient has received > 19 cycles on a recently initiated extended treatment protocol. Conclusions: In a BTZ-exposed population that includes BTZ treatment failures and significant comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, renal insufficiency, etc), the 18% ORR (CBR 30%) is notable for this steroid- and anthracycline-sparing regimen. Single-agent CFZ is well tolerated, even in patients with renal insufficiency, and both myelosuppression and PN are uncommon. These data support the continuing evaluation of CFZ as a safe and effective treatment option in MM. Disclosures: Siegel: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Wang:Proteolix, Inc.: Research Funding. Stewart:Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McDonagh:Proteolix: Research Funding. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Le:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Kunkel:Proteolix: Consultancy, Employment. Bennett:Proteolix: Employment. Kauffman:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Vij:Proteolix, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text