Clinical Spectrum of Germline Mutations with Predisposition to Myeloid Neoplasms- 2016 World Health Organization Classification Update

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 300-300
Author(s):  
Thanh Ho ◽  
Juliana Perez Botero ◽  
William J Hogan ◽  
Saad S Kenderian ◽  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms has specifically categorized germline mutations that are associated with myeloid clonal evolution (Arber et al. Blood 2016). This group consists of myeloid neoplasms with an isolated germline predisposition (CEBPA, DDX41), myeloid neoplasms associated with congenital thrombocytopenia (ETV6, RUNX1, ANKRD26) and germline myeloid neoplasms with multi-organ dysfunction (GATA2, chromosomal breakage disorders, telomere biology disorders etc). We carried out this study to describe the clinical spectrum of germline disorders with predisposition to myeloid neoplasms as categorized by the 2016 WHO classification revision. Methods: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, the adult and pediatric bone marrow failure syndrome database (1990-2016) and the electronic medical record were queried for germline disorders involving GATA2, CEBPA, DDX41, ETV6, RUNX1, ANKRD26, Down syndrome and Noonan syndrome. Chromosomal breakage assays (Diepoxybutane/Mitomycin-C), flow-fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for telomere length assessment, Fanconi anemia complementation assays and Sanger/Next Generation sequencing (NGS) for the aforementioned germline disorders with myeloid predisposition were carried out in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratories. These disorders were then classified based on the 2016 WHO classification revision. Results : 54 individuals (37 families) were included in the study. Eleven (20%) patients belonging to 5 families were identified as having germline mutations with a preexisting platelet disorder: ETV6 (n=1), ANKRD26 (n=5), RUNX1 (n=5). Forty-three (79%) patients (32 families) had inherited syndromes with multi-organ dysfunction: GATA2 (n=11, 26%), bone marrow failure syndromes (n=14, 33%) and telomere biology disorder (n=14, 33%). There was one patient with neurofibromatosis with a germline PTPN11 mutation who developed juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, while there were three patients with Down syndrome; 2 with transient abnormal myelopoiesis and one who developed acute megakaryocytic leukemia. The clinical phenotype, prevalence and characteristics of myeloid clonal evolution and outcomes are presented in Table 1. No patients with germline CEBPA or DDX41 mutations were identified. Patients with germline platelet disorders did not have any prominent non-hematological manifestations. Erythrocytosis (20%) with long-standing thrombocytopenia (100%) was a unique feature associated with ANKRD26 mutations. Non-hematologic clues such as human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven warts, primary lymphedema (Emberger syndrome) and frequent atypical infections with monocytopenia were seen in patients with germline GATA2 mutations, and preceded myeloid clonal evolution (morphologic, cytogenetic and molecular). Notably, the age at presentation and penetrance of myeloid transformation was variable, with individuals from the same family developing symptoms during the first decade of life and others remaining asymptomatic to date (fifth decade). Somatic ASXL1 mutations were detected in all 3 (100%) patients with GATA2 mutations and in one patient with ANKRD26 mutation that developed myeloid clonal evolution. In our study myeloid clonal evolution was seen in 40% with RUNX1 mutations, 27% with GATA2 mutations, and 20% with ANKRD26 mutations. We could not calculate the same for bone marrow failure syndromes as the total number of cases seen are still being assessed. Outcomes with allogeneic stem cell transplantation were favorable in appropriately selected patients (Table 1). Conclusion : The 2016 WHO revision to the classification of myeloid neoplasms highlights the importance of recognition and molecular characterization of germline mutations (syndromic and non-syndromic) with risk for myeloid clonal evolution. While some of these disorders (GATA2, Fanconi anemia, telomere biology disorders) may have important non-hematological clues, many present with isolated thrombocytopenia (RUNX1, ETV6). The age and frequency of myeloid evolution is highly variable. Acquisition of somatic ASXL1 mutations at the time of clonal myeloid transformation highlights the role of epigenetic dysregulation in disease evolution. Disclosures Kenderian: Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 3875-3876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Elstrom ◽  
Liang Guan ◽  
Gary Baker ◽  
Khozaim Nakhoda ◽  
Jo-Anne Vergilio ◽  
...  

Abstract We retrospectively evaluated 18fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans in 172 patients with lymphoma and correlated results with pathologic diagnosis using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. In total, FDG-PET detected disease in at least one site in 161 patients (94%) and failed to detect disease in 11 patients (6%). The most frequent lymphoma diagnoses were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL; n = 51), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; n = 47), follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 42), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL; n = 12), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 7), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL; n = 5). FDG-PET detected disease in 100% of patients with LBCL and MCL and in 98% of patients with HL and FL. In contrast, FDG-PET detected disease in only 67% of MZL and 40% of PTCL. Comparison with bone marrow biopsies showed that FDG-PET was not reliable for detection of bone marrow involvement in any lymphoma subtype.


Hematology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Vardiman ◽  
Elizabeth Hyjek

Abstract There is no single category in the fourth edition (2008) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms that encompasses all of the diseases referred to by some authors as the myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) “variants.” Instead, they are considered as distinct entities and are distributed among various subgroups of myeloid neoplasms in the classification scheme. These relatively uncommon neoplasms do not meet the criteria for any so-called “classical” MPN (chronic myelogenous leukemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, or essential thrombocythemia) and, although some exhibit myelodysplasia, none meets the criteria for any myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). They are a diverse group of neoplasms ranging from fairly well-characterized disorders such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia to rare and thus poorly characterized disorders such as chronic neutrophilic leukemia. Recently, however, there has been a surge of information regarding the genetic infrastructure of neoplastic cells in the MPN variants, allowing some to be molecularly defined. Nevertheless, in most cases, correlation of clinical, genetic, and morphologic findings is required for diagnosis and classification. The fourth edition of the WHO classification provides a framework to incorporate those neoplasms in which a genetic abnormality is a major defining criterion of the disease, such as those associated with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and FGFR1, as well as for those in which no specific genetic defect has yet been discovered and which remain clinically and pathologically defined. An understanding of the clinical, morphologic, and genetic features of the MPN variants will facilitate their diagnosis.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2906-2906
Author(s):  
Animesh D. Pardanani ◽  
Ken-Hong Lim ◽  
Terra L Lasho ◽  
Christy Finke ◽  
Rebecca McClure ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2906 Poster Board II-882 Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system recognizes indolent SM (ISM) as an entity characterized by low systemic mast cell (MC) burden but frequent skin involvement. The WHO system also recognizes 2 provisional ISM sub-variants: smoldering SM (SSM) and bone marrow (BM) mastocytosis (BMM). The two are respectively characterized by increased systemic MC burden (presence of ≥ 2 ‘B-findings') and BM MC infiltration in the absence of skin or multiorgan visceral lesions. The prognostic relevance of this sub-classification remains unclear. Methods: The study population was drawn from a larger cohort of 342 adult SM patients (Blood. 2009 Jun 4;113(23):5727). Clinical data and BM histology were reviewed, and the diagnosis of ISM and its subclassification confirmed per the 2008 WHO proposal. The primary objectives of the study were to: (i) describe the clinical characteristics of a large cohort of ISM patients, within the context of the WHO classification; (ii) evaluate the prevalence of molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities; (iii) evaluate whether ISM subclassification is prognostically relevant on the basis of survival and risk of transformation to acute leukemia or aggressive SM (ASM). Results: (i) Clinical characteristics: 159 ISM patients were evaluated (69 males; median age 49 years, range 19-84); 22 (14%) had SSM, 36 (23%) BMM, and 101 (63%) ‘ISM-other' (ISMo). By definition, ‘B-findings' were absent in BMM patients. ‘B-findings' in SSM (and ISMo) patients was as follows: hepatosplenomegaly and/or lymphadenopathy 91% (21%), BM MC >30% or serum tryptase level >200ng/mL 68% (8%), and hypercellular BM or dysmyelopoiesis without cytopenias 50% (2%). SSM patients were older (p<0.01) and more frequently displayed constitutional symptoms (p<0.01), and anemia (p<0.01). MC mediator-release symptoms (p=0.01), including anaphylaxis (p<0.01), were more frequent in BMM. The following MC-mediators were studied: serum tryptase (57%), beta prostaglandin F2alpha (45%), urine methylhistamine (32%), and urine histamine (21%) – significant differences were noted amongst the ISM subgroups with the following relationship: SSM>ISMo>BMM (p<0.01). (ii) Molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities: Complete karyotype information was available for 55 patients; only 1 patient (with ISMo) had an abnormal karyotype. Fifty nine patients were screened for KITD816V and JAK2V617F; JAK2V617F was universally absent, and distribution of KITD816V was not significantly different amongst the ISM subgroups: SSM (100%), BMM (92%), and ISMo (69%). (iii) Survival and risk of disease transformation: At a median follow of 27 months (range <1-417), 26 deaths were recorded (ISMo 14, SSM 10, and BMM 2), and the combined median survival was 198 months: ISMo 301 months, SSM 120 months, and BMM (not reached) (p<0.01; Figure). Transformation to acute leukemia and ASM was seen in 1 patient (SSM) and 3 patients (2 SSM and 1 ISMo), respectively. Conclusions: Among WHO-defined ISM patients, SSM is associated with significantly shorter survival whereas BMM and ISMo are prognostically similar. If these observations are confirmed by others, consideration may be given to classifying SSM as a distinct subcategory of SM, instead of a sub-variant of ISM as it currently stands. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 2292-2302 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Vardiman ◽  
Nancy Lee Harris ◽  
Richard D. Brunning

A World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms has recently been published. This classification was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society for Hematopathology, the European Association of Hematopathologists, and more than 100 clinical hematologists and scientists who are internationally recognized for their expertise in hematopoietic neoplasms. For the lymphoid neoplasms, this classification provides a refinement of the entities described in the Revised European-American Lymphoma (REAL) Classification—a system that is now used worldwide. To date, however, there has been no published explanation or rationale given for the WHO classification of the myeloid neoplasms. The purpose of this communication is to outline briefly the WHO classification of malignant myeloid diseases, to draw attention to major differences between it and antecedent classification schemes, and to provide the rationale for those differences.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 937-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Vardiman ◽  
Jüergen Thiele ◽  
Daniel A. Arber ◽  
Richard D. Brunning ◽  
Michael J. Borowitz ◽  
...  

Recently the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the European Association for Haematopathology and the Society for Hematopathology, published a revised and updated edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. The 4th edition of the WHO classification incorporates new information that has emerged from scientific and clinical studies in the interval since the publication of the 3rd edition in 2001, and includes new criteria for the recognition of some previously described neoplasms as well as clarification and refinement of the defining criteria for others. It also adds entities—some defined principally by genetic features—that have only recently been characterized. In this paper, the classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia is highlighted with the aim of familiarizing hematologists, clinical scientists, and hematopathologists not only with the major changes in the classification but also with the rationale for those changes.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (20) ◽  
pp. 2391-2405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Arber ◽  
Attilio Orazi ◽  
Robert Hasserjian ◽  
Jürgen Thiele ◽  
Michael J. Borowitz ◽  
...  

Abstract The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues was last updated in 2008. Since then, there have been numerous advances in the identification of unique biomarkers associated with some myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, largely derived from gene expression analysis and next-generation sequencing that can significantly improve the diagnostic criteria as well as the prognostic relevance of entities currently included in the WHO classification and that also suggest new entities that should be added. Therefore, there is a clear need for a revision to the current classification. The revisions to the categories of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia will be published in a monograph in 2016 and reflect a consensus of opinion of hematopathologists, hematologists, oncologists, and geneticists. The 2016 edition represents a revision of the prior classification rather than an entirely new classification and attempts to incorporate new clinical, prognostic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic data that have emerged since the last edition. The major changes in the classification and their rationale are presented here.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document