Evaluation of pulmonary hypertension by right heart catheterisation: does timing matter?

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 1901892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athiththan Yogeswaran ◽  
Manuel Jonas Richter ◽  
Natascha Sommer ◽  
Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani ◽  
Werner Seeger ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (138) ◽  
pp. 642-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Rosenkranz ◽  
Ioana R. Preston

Right heart catheterisation (RHC) plays a central role in identifying pulmonary hypertension (PH) disorders, and is required to definitively diagnose pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite widespread acceptance, there is a lack of guidance regarding the best practice for performing RHC in clinical practice. In order to ensure the correct evaluation of haemodynamic parameters directly measured or calculated from RHC, attention should be drawn to standardising procedures such as the position of the pressure transducer and catheter balloon inflation volume. Measurement of pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, in particular, is vulnerable to over- or under-wedging, which can give rise to false readings. In turn, errors in RHC measurement and data interpretation can complicate the differentiation of PAH from other PH disorders and lead to misdiagnosis. In addition to diagnosis, the role of RHC in conjunction with noninvasive tests is widening rapidly to encompass monitoring of treatment response and establishing prognosis of patients diagnosed with PAH. However, further standardisation of RHC is warranted to ensure optimal use in routine clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1800458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Guth ◽  
Christoph B. Wiedenroth ◽  
Andreas Rieth ◽  
Manuel J. Richter ◽  
Ekkehard Gruenig ◽  
...  

Symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) without pulmonary hypertension often show an excessive increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) during exercise.We report on the impact of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) on pulmonary haemodynamics in a prospective series of 32 consecutive CTED patients who underwent PEA. All patients had a comprehensive diagnostic work-up including right heart catheterisation at baseline and 12 months after PEA. Furthermore, in 12 patients exercise right heart catheterisation was performed before and after PEA.After PEA, MPAP was lower at rest (20±3 versus 17±3 mmHg; p=0.008) and during maximal exercise (39±8 versus 31±6 mmHg; p=0.016). The mean total pulmonary resistance (TPR) decreased from 3.6±0.8 Wood Units (WU) pre-operatively to 2.7±0.7 WU 1 year after PEA (p=0.004) and the mean slope of the MPAP/cardiac output (CO) relationship decreased from 3.6±1.0 to 2.3±0.8 WU (p=0.002). Peak oxygen uptake increased from 1.2±0.4 to 1.5±0.3 L·min−1 (p=0.014) and ventilatory equivalents of carbon dioxide decreased from 39±2 to 30±2 (p=0.002). There was a significant improvement in quality of life assessed by the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review questionnaire.In CTED patients, PEA resulted in haemodynamic and clinical improvements. The means of TPR and MPAP/CO slopes decreased to <3.0 WU.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. H. Fonseca ◽  
R. Souza ◽  
V. M. C. Salemi ◽  
C. V. P. Jardim ◽  
S. F. M. Gualandro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document