scholarly journals Approaches to quality improvement in nursing homes: Lessons learned from the six-state pilot of CMS's Nursing Home Quality Initiative

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Kissam ◽  
David Gifford ◽  
Peggy Parks ◽  
Gail Patry ◽  
Laura Palmer ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S381-S381
Author(s):  
Ramona Backhaus ◽  
Hilde Verbeek ◽  
Bram De Boer ◽  
Erik Van Rossum ◽  
Jos Schols ◽  
...  

Abstract Related to the Dutch nursing home quality framework implemented in 2017, a staffing guideline was developed, aimed at assisting nursing homes to adequately staff their wards. For the Dutch Ministry of Health, we investigated the evidence base of this guideline. We critically reviewed scientific literature (n=65) and interviewed (inter)national experts (n=8) and potential guideline users (n=5). We found that departing a quality improvement dialogue directly from teams, clients and their families is positive. However, weaknesses were identified as well. Several risks exist for employees to adequately assess resident needs. Furthermore, buy-in is needed from board level to develop a vision on which competencies and amount of staff are needed to fulfill these needs. Examples of guideline improvement recommendations were assisting teams in how to assess resident needs, critically reflect on care provision and considering a role for (top)management. Overall, it was concluded that the value of the guideline was limited.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Gillespie ◽  
Tobie Olsan ◽  
Dianne Liebel ◽  
Xueya Cai ◽  
Reginald Stewart ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1498-1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Baier ◽  
Kristen Butterfield ◽  
Gail Patry ◽  
Yael Harris ◽  
Stefan Gravenstein

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 24-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Abrahamson ◽  
Heather Davila ◽  
Christine Mueller ◽  
Thomas Inui ◽  
Greg Arling

2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn J. Rantz ◽  
Gregory F. Petroski ◽  
Richard W. Madsen ◽  
David R. Mehr ◽  
Lori Popejoy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872093165
Author(s):  
R. Tamara Konetzka ◽  
Kevin Yan ◽  
Rachel M. Werner

Approximately two decades ago, federally mandated public reporting began for U.S. nursing homes through a system now known as Nursing Home Compare. The goals were to provide information to enable consumers to choose higher quality nursing homes and to incent providers to improve the quality of care delivered. We conduct a systematic review of the literature on responses to Nursing Home Compare and its effectiveness in meeting these goals. We find evidence of modest but meaningful response by both consumers and providers. However, we also find evidence that some improvement in scores does not reflect true quality improvement, that disparities by race and income have increased, that risk-adjustment of the measures is likely inadequate, and that several key domains of quality are not represented. Our results support moderate success of Nursing Home Compare in achieving intended goals but also reveal the need for continued refinement.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Carlstedt ◽  
Håkan Jönson

PurposeMedia reporting is one of many circumstances that nursing homes have to relate to, because of the reputational risks. The aim of this article is to investigate media representations of Swedish nursing homes in relation to reports on an annual national user survey.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical data consist of 381 Swedish newspaper articles about the survey results. The questions guiding the analysis were: what messages on nursing homes are communicated, and how are claims organized in order to appear factual?FindingsThe data show that press reports focus on comparisons of care units' survey results, eldercare representatives' explanations of the results, and what improvements will be made in order to do better in the next year's survey. With their use of truth-making rhetoric, press articles construct survey results as credible and valid, thus mirroring user perceptions and ultimately nursing home quality. The selection of nursing home representatives' comments equally reinforces the validity of claims.Originality/valueGiven nursing homes' problems with demonstrating success, the authors argue that media reports on the user survey is a way for eldercare organizations to achieve results in an otherwise resultless field, and while media reports might be seen as prompting change in nursing home care, what is ultimately achieved is the legitimation of a costly survey with low response rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document