scholarly journals Effective peer-to-peer support for young people with end-stage renal disease: a mixed methods evaluation of Camp COOL

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane NT Sattoe ◽  
Susan Jedeloo ◽  
AnneLoes van Staa
2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
Marques Shek Nam Ng ◽  
Cho Lee Wong ◽  
Kai Chow Choi ◽  
Yun Ho Hui ◽  
Eva Hau Sim Ho ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Agudelo-Botero ◽  
María Cecilia González-Robledo ◽  
Hortensia Reyes-Morales ◽  
Liliana Giraldo-Rodríguez ◽  
Mario Rojas-Russell ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Damery ◽  
Kim Sein ◽  
Johann Nicholas ◽  
Jyoti Baharani ◽  
Gill Combes

Abstract Background Lower-level emotional and psychological difficulties (‘distress’) in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), can lead to reduced quality of life and poor clinical outcomes. National guidelines mandate provision of emotional and psychological support for renal patients yet little is known about the support that patients may require, or the challenges that staff experience in identifying and responding to patient distress. Methods Mixed methods study in renal units at four NHS Trusts in the West Midlands, UK involving cross-sectional surveys of ESRD patients and renal unit staff and semi-structured interviews with 46 purposively-sampled patients and 31 renal unit staff. Interviews explored patients’ experience of distress and personal coping strategies, staff attitudes towards patient distress and perceptions of their role, responsibility and capacity. Results Patient distress was widespread (346/1040; 33.3%), and emotional problems were frequently reported. Younger patients, females, those from black and minority ethnic (BME) groups and patients recently initiating dialysis reported particular support needs. Staff recognised the value of supporting distressed patients, yet support often depended on individual staff members’ skills and personal approach. Staff reported difficulties with onward referral to formal counselling and psychology services and a lack of immediate access to less formalised options. There was also a substantial training/skills gap whereby many staff reported lacking the confidence to recognise and respond to patient distress. Staff fell broadly into three groups: ‘Enthusiasts’ who considered identifying and responding to patient distress as integral to their role; ‘Equivocators’ who thought that managing distress was part of their role, but who lacked skills and confidence to do this effectively, and ‘Avoiders’ who did not see managing distress as part of their role and actively avoided the issue with patients. Conclusions Embedding the value of emotional support provision into renal unit culture is the key to ‘normalising’ discussions about distress. Immediately accessible, informal support options should be available, and all renal staff should be offered training to proactively identify and reactively manage patient distress. Emotional support for staff is important to ensure that a greater emphasis on managing patient distress is not associated with an increased incidence of staff burnout.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document