scholarly journals Changes in the magnitude of social inequality in the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Taiwan, a country implementing a population-based organized screening program

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Ti Chiou ◽  
Chien-Yuan Wu ◽  
Baai-Shyun Hurng ◽  
Tsung-Hsueh Lu
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Portela ◽  
V Cruz ◽  
H Monteiro ◽  
F Tavares

Abstract Management of a population-based screening program circuit depends on characteristics and technical barriers of its application and implementation. The aim is to clarify the information flow, to understand and build a vision of cervical screening information flows in Northern Regional Health Administration Portuguese Public System and to identify the constraints among them. A total of 5 cluster meetings were presented and two expert interviews were conducted allowing to present an informational flow and its constraints. Aims addressed in each interview where based on the expertise of the interviewed. Cervical cancer screening program depends on the use of SiiMA application. This is an information system for the management of population-based screening program which involves mainly 3 entities and allows a longitudinal data collection and study. Three main constraints were reported. The time for updating data for the list of eligible women was bigger than accorded reaching up to 3 months delay. A duplicate of records and discharges in hospital care since the discharge was done both in the hospital system and the SiiMA platform manually in order to the woman re-enter the screening program. Pendencies were seen due to other screening programs running in parallel which had to be sorted out manually in the regional level or by the entity involved. The existence of a screening application is vital for the implementation purposes of a screening program. The lack of integration of the systems increases bureaucratic work, costs and causes time delay. To improve the efficiency of digital transformation ensuring the quality of the process it is necessary to adapt the design of the health informatic systems to the daily practice and its wants and needs. The strategies of forcing an ever-increasing number of frameworks have demonstrated not to be so effective. Therefore, it is a cornerstone to understand these flows in order to improve its structure, intervention and optimization. Key messages The existence of a screening digital application is vital but its expanding use arises constraints. Due to the complexity of such programs, a digital strategy is crucial for management and monitoring of the screening at this scale.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Nessler ◽  
Francis Ball ◽  
Sze Kay Florence Chan ◽  
Michal Chwalek ◽  
Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Healthcare systems have adopted different strategies to reduce the burden of cervical cancer. In Poland, a population-based screening program was implemented in 2006, leading to a downward trend in cervical cancer burden. However, screening rates are still low in relation to other EU member states. In Poland, Pap smears are mainly performed by gynecologists rather than Primary Health Care (PHC) physicians. Little is known about the experiences and attitudes of the latter regarding cervical cancer screening in a PHC setting. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was carried out among 43 PHC physicians from the Malopolska region in Poland. Barriers and attitudes towards cytology in a PHC setting were evaluated. Results Approximately 35% of surveyed physicians reported having experience in performing cytology. Almost 75% of PHC physicians lacked the necessary equipment in their office to perform the screening. None of the studied physicians performed Pap smears in their office at the time. The reasons included: shortage of competence (78.57%) and time (69.05%), the perception of Pap smears as a task for gynecologists (69.05%), the lack of financial incentives (61.90%), and the belief that their patients would be unwilling to undergo the test in their PHC physician’s office (33.33%). More than three quarters (76.74%) declared they would be ready to perform Pap smears if the tests were additionally paid. No significant associations between PHC physicians’ characteristics and their willingness to perform cytology screening were found. Conclusion The primary barrier to perform Pap smears by PHC physicians does not lie in their personal reluctance but in the organization of the healthcare system. Provision of required training and proper funding allocation can likely improve the screening rate of cervical cancer in Poland.


2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
pp. 1952-1958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Gultekin ◽  
Mujdegul Zayifoglu Karaca ◽  
Irem Kucukyildiz ◽  
Selin Dundar ◽  
Guledal Boztas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sharonjit K. Dhillon ◽  
Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak ◽  
Lan Xu ◽  
Mario Poljak ◽  
Marc Arbyn

Only clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) tests should be used in cervical cancer screening. VALGENT provides a framework to validate new HPV tests. In the VALGENT-3 study, the clinical accuracy of the recently launched Abbott Alinity m HR HPV assay (Alinity m) to detect cervical precancerous lesions was assessed against the standard comparator test (Hybrid Capture 2; HC2) and additionally against two previously validated alternative comparator tests (Abbott RealTime HR HPV and Roche cobas 4800 assays). Validation was conducted using 1,300 consecutive cervical samples from women attending an organized population-based cervical screening program enriched with 300 cytologically abnormal samples. Overall hrHPV test concordance was assessed by kappa values; the concordance for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was assessed for Alinity m, RealTime, and cobas, and the Linear Array (Roche) was used for more detailed genotyping concordance. In the total study population, the relative sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ and CIN3+ of Alinity m compared to HC2 was 1.02 (95% CI:0.99–1.06) and 1.03 (95% CI:0.99–1.06), respectively. The relative specificity for ≤ CIN1 was 1.01 (95% CI:1.00–1.02) (all pni ≤ 0.001). Alinity m showed non-inferior clinical accuracy among women 30 years or older when cobas or RealTime were used as comparators. HPV genotype-specific concordance between Alinity m and the three comparator tests showed excellent agreement, with kappa values ranging between 0.82 and 1.00. In conclusion, Alinity m fulfils the international accuracy requirements for use in cervical cancer screening and shows excellent HPV genotype-specific concordance with three clinically validated HPV tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document