scholarly journals Cigarette ignition propensity, smoking behavior, and toxicant exposure: A natural experiment in Canada

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristie M June ◽  
David Hammond ◽  
Andreas Sjödin ◽  
Zheng Li ◽  
Lovisa Romanoff ◽  
...  
Addiction ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 1667-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal L. Benowitz ◽  
Natalie Nardone ◽  
Katherine M. Dains ◽  
Sharon M. Hall ◽  
Susan Stewart ◽  
...  

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (28) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
John L. Pauly ◽  
Richard J. O'Connor ◽  
Geraldine M. Paszkiewicz ◽  
K. Michael Cummings ◽  
Mirjana V. Djordjevic ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 3321-3333 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Pauly ◽  
Richard J. O'Connor ◽  
Geraldine M. Paszkiewicz ◽  
K. Michael Cummings ◽  
Mirjana V. Djordjevic ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E Adkison ◽  
Richard J O’Connor ◽  
Ron Borland ◽  
Hua-Hie Yong ◽  
K Cummings ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel L Denlinger-Apte ◽  
Michael Kotlyar ◽  
Joseph S Koopmeiners ◽  
Jennifer W Tidey ◽  
Xianghua Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Because 30% of cigarettes sold in the United States are characterized as menthol cigarettes, it is important to understand how menthol preference may affect the impact of a nicotine reduction policy. Methods In a recent trial, non-treatment-seeking smokers were randomly assigned to receive very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNC; 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or normal nicotine cigarettes (NNC; 15.5 mg/g) for 20 weeks. On the basis of preference, participants received menthol or non-menthol cigarettes. We conducted multivariable regression analyses to examine whether menthol preference moderated the effects of nicotine content on cigarettes per day (CPD), breath carbon monoxide (CO), urinary total nicotine equivalents (TNE), urinary 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid (CEMA), and abstinence. Results At baseline, menthol smokers (n = 346) reported smoking fewer CPD (14.9 vs. 19.2) and had lower TNE (52.8 vs. 71.6 nmol/mg) and CO (17.7 vs. 20.5 ppm) levels than non-menthol smokers (n = 406; ps < .05). At week 20, significant interactions indicated that menthol smokers had smaller treatment effects than non-menthol smokers for CPD (–6.4 vs. –9.3), TNE (ratio of geometric means, 0.22 vs. 0.10) and CEMA (ratio, 0.56 vs. 0.37; ps < .05), and trended toward a smaller treatment effect for CO (–4.5 vs. –7.3 ppm; p = .06). Odds ratios for abstinence at week 20 were 1.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8 to 4.4) for menthol and 9.11 (95% CI = 3.3 to 25.2) for non-menthol VLNC smokers (p = .02) relative to the NNC condition. Conclusions Although menthol smokers experienced reductions in smoking, toxicant exposure, and increases in quitting when using VLNC cigarettes, the magnitude of change was smaller than that observed for non-menthol smokers. Implications Results of this analysis suggest that smokers of menthol cigarettes may respond to a nicotine reduction policy with smaller reductions in smoking rates and toxicant exposure than would smokers of non-menthol cigarettes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1011-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. O'Connor ◽  
V. W. Rees ◽  
K. J. Norton ◽  
K. M. Cummings ◽  
G. N. Connolly ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Amelang ◽  
Petra Hasselbach ◽  
Til Stürmer

Abstract. Ten years ago a sample of N = 5.133 male and female subjects (age 28-74) responded to questionnaires including scales for personality, life style, work stress as well as questions on prevalent disease. We now report on the follow-up regarding self-reported incidence of cardiovascular disease and cancer. During a mean follow-up of 10 years, 257 participants had died. Of those alive, N = 4.010 (82%) participated in the follow-up. Of these, 120 and 180 persons reported incident cardiovascular disease and cancer, respectively. The incidence of cardiovascular disease could be significantly predicted by the personality factors “Emotional Lability”, “Behavioral Control” and “Type-A-Behavior” as well as by the “Rationality/Antemotionality”-scale according to Grossarth-Maticek. After controlling for age, gender and smoking behavior only the significant effect of “Emotional Lability” remained and the predictors according to Grossarth-Maticek had no incremental validity. Cancer could not be predicted by any personality factors.


1970 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-76
Author(s):  
ANTHONY DAVIDS
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document