scholarly journals Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs - current status and future challenges

Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Nangalia ◽  
David R Prytherch ◽  
Gary B Smith
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Future Challenges

scholarly journals Health technology assessment: what is it? Current status and perspectives in the field of electrophysiology

EP Europace ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii49-ii53 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Fattore ◽  
N. Maniadakis ◽  
L. G. Mantovani ◽  
G. Boriani
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status

scholarly journals The Use of Societal Criteria in Priority Setting for Health Technology Assessment in the Netherlands: Initial Experiences and Future Challenges

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wija J. Oortwijn ◽  
Hindrik Vondeling ◽  
Lex Bouter
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
The Cost

AbstractPriority setting for the evaluation of health technologies in the Netherlands is exclusively based on the scientific merits of individual research proposals. This process has not resulted in satisfactory allocation of resources. Therefore, societal criteria for setting priorities for health technology assessment have been proposed as an adjunct to scientific criteria. These societal criteria include the burden of disease, uncertainty about the (cost-)effectiveness of the intervention at issue, the potential benefits of the research project, and its potential impact on health care. To realize the full potential of this model for priority setting, a number of methodological issues need to be addressed. Joint efforts of researchers and policy makers in this field are necessary for future progress.

scholarly journals PHP300 - HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ROADMAP FOR UKRAINE - THE PERSPECTIVE OF STAKHOLDERS ON CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S201
Author(s):  
M. Csanádi ◽  
A. Inotai ◽  
B. Németh ◽  
O. Oleshchuk ◽  
O. Lebega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status

A 10-YEAR HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN ARGENTINA

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graciela Demirdjian
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Services Research ◽  
Technology Acquisition ◽  
Organizational Effects ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Organizational Results

Objectives: To describe the first hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) program in a public hospital in Argentina, and report some clinical, educational, economic and organizational results after 10 years of its implementation.Methods: A hospital-based HTA program was created in March 2001 at Hospital Garrahan (Buenos Aires, Argentina), a national pediatric facility with a self-managed budget. Its main goal is to promote a rational and evidence-based technologic development. The program consists of HTA reports for technology acquisition, clinical practice guidelines (CPG), capacity building in research and management, and technical support for health services research (HSR). The evaluation cycle comprises: prioritization, evidence synthesis, dissemination and monitoring. We report program performance, comment educational and organizational effects, and discuss unresolved issues and future challenges.Results: During the first 10 years the program produced 18 HTA reports on drugs (6 = 33 percent), therapeutic (6 = 33 percent), preventive (2 = 11 percent) or diagnostic (2 = 11 percent) procedures and institutional programs (3 = 17 percent). The scope covered effectiveness (12 = 67 percent), safety (10 = 56 percent), budget impact (6 = 33 percent), cost-effectiveness (2 = 11 percent) and organizational impact (3 = 17 percent). Mean time from request to report was 10 months. Eleven pediatric CPGs were submitted to expert consensus and disseminated for full-text Web access. A 1-year course on research and management was completed by 225 professionals in 6 years, and twenty-two projects for HSR were coached.Conclusions: Our experience shows that an HTA program is both feasible and useful in a public hospital of a developing country. Promotion of hospital-based HTA, professional integration in HTA activities and network collaboration to discuss unresolved issues with colleagues can multiply the benefits and optimize the use of hospital budgets.

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Access Policies

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-289
Author(s):  
Verena Stühlinger
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Pricing And Reimbursement ◽  
Application Decision ◽  
Access Policies

Abstract For patients, innovations in healthcare can be both a great blessing (when saving people’s life or improving quality of life), as well as a curse (when only few people have access, e.g., because of high prices). Thus, when healthcare innovations are proven safe and ready for application, decision makers have to apply access policies and sometimes face difficult assessments. In this context, health technology assessment (HTA) plays a crucial role at European Union level, forming an evidence-based, transparent basis for decision making through joint assessments. However, pricing and reimbursement aspects are exempt from collaborative assessments, since these are in the responsibility of the EU Member States: according to Art. 168(7) TFEU the ‘organisation and delivery of health services and medical care [… including] the allocation of the resources assigned to them’ remain an exclusive competence of Member States. However, future challenges may require further cooperation.

VP18 Early Awareness And Alert System In Sweden: History And Current Status

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 154-155
Author(s):  
Irene Eriksson ◽  
Björn Wettermark ◽  
Marie Persson ◽  
Morgan Edström ◽  
Brian Godman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
National Level ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Health Technologies

INTRODUCTION:Over the past decades, early awareness and alert (EAA) activities and systems have gained importance and become a key early Health Technology Assessment (HTA) tool. While a pioneer in HTA, Sweden had no national level EAA activities until recently. We describe the evolution and current status of the Swedish EAA System.METHODS:This was a historical analysis based on the knowledge and experience of the authors supplemented by a targeted review of published and grey literature, as well as documents produced by or relating to the Swedish EAA System. Key milestones and a description of the current state of the Swedish EAA System are presented.RESULTS:Initiatives to establish a system for the identification and assessment of emerging health technologies in Sweden date back to the 1980s. Since the 1990s, the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) supported the development of EuroScan and was one of its founding members. In the mid-2000s, an independent regional initiative, driven by the Stockholm Drug and Therapeutics Committee, resulted in the establishment of a regional horizon scanning unit. By 2009, this work had expanded to a collaboration between the four biggest regions in Sweden. The following year it was further expanded to the national level. Today, the Swedish EAA System carries out identification, filtration and prioritization of new drugs, early assessment of the prioritized drugs, and dissemination of the information. Its outputs are used to select new drugs for inclusion in the Swedish national process for managed introduction and follow-up.CONCLUSIONS:The Swedish EAA System started as a regional initiative and rapidly grew to become a national level activity. An important feature of the system today is its complete integration into the national process for managed introduction and follow-up of new drugs. The system will continue to evolve as a response both to the changing landscape of health innovations and to new policy initiatives at the regional, national and international levels.

Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcell Csanádi ◽  
András Inotai ◽  
Oleksandra Oleshchuk ◽  
Oksana Lebega ◽  
Brodovskaya Alexandra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Patient Organizations ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Status

AbstractObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document