Can brachial artery peak velocity variation and changes in this parameter in response to passive leg raising be used as a marker to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing septic patients?

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jost Mullenheim
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Préau ◽  
Florent Dewavrin ◽  
Vincent Soland ◽  
Perrine Bortolotti ◽  
Delphine Colling ◽  
...  

Objective. We hypothesized that the hemodynamic response to a deep inspiration maneuver (DIM) indicates fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing (SB) patients.Design. Prospective study.Setting. ICU of a general hospital.Patients. Consecutive nonintubated patients without mechanical ventilation, considered for volume expansion (VE).Intervention. We assessed hemodynamic status at baseline and after VE.Measurements and Main Results. We measured radial pulse pressure (PP) using an arterial catheter and peak velocity of femoral artery flow (VF) using continuous Doppler. Changes in PP and VF induced by a DIM (ΔPPdim andΔVFdim) were calculated in 23 patients.ΔPPdim andΔVFdim ≥12% predicted responders to VE with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%.Conclusions. In a restricted population of SB patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis,ΔPPdim andΔVFdim are accurate indices for predicting fluid responsiveness. These results should be confirmed in a larger population before validating their use in current practice.


2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662093439
Author(s):  
Adeel Abbasi ◽  
Mohammed Nayeemuddin ◽  
Nader Azab ◽  
Alexandra Schick ◽  
Thomas Lopardo ◽  
...  

Background: Respiratory variation in carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ΔVpeak) assessed by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a noninvasive means to predict fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the ability of carotid ΔVpeak as assessed by novice physician sonologists to predict fluid responsiveness. Methods: This study was conducted in 2 intensive care units. Spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients with signs of volume depletion were included. Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter, cardiogenic, obstructive or neurogenic shock, or those for whom further intravenous (IV) fluid administration would be harmful were excluded. Three novice physician sonologists were trained in POCUS assessment of carotid ΔVpeak. They assessed the carotid ΔVpeak in study participants prior to the administration of a 500 mL IV fluid bolus. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in cardiac index as measured using bioreactance. Results: Eighty-six participants were enrolled, 50 (58.1%) were fluid responders. Carotid ΔVpeak performed poorly at predicting fluid responsiveness. Test characteristics for the optimum carotid ΔVpeak of 8.0% were: area under the receiver operating curve = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.73), sensitivity = 72.0% (95% CI: 58.3-82.56), specificity = 50.0% (95% CI: 34.5-65.5). Conclusions: Novice physician sonologists using POCUS are unable to predict fluid responsiveness using carotid ΔVpeak. Until further research identifies key limiting factors, clinicians should use caution directing IV fluid resuscitation using carotid ΔVpeak.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Préau ◽  
Fabienne Saulnier ◽  
Florent Dewavrin ◽  
Alain Durocher ◽  
Jean-Luc Chagnon

CHEST Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 1279-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Malhotra ◽  
Matthias Eikermann ◽  
Sheldon Magder

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document