scholarly journals Custom-made reverse shoulder arthroplasty for severe glenoid bone loss: review of the literature and our preliminary results

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Porcellini ◽  
G. M. Micheloni ◽  
L. Tarallo ◽  
P. Paladini ◽  
G. Merolla ◽  
...  

Abstract The treatment of severe glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty represents a challenge, and the results of current prosthetic designs with only glenoid fixation still remain unsatisfactory. In the past decade, customized glenoid prostheses have been developed to address severe glenoid arthritis and in the revision setting. In this review, we analyzed the current surgical options, the classification limits, past literature evidence, and our preliminary results of 6 patients (3 male, 3 female) treated with a reverse implant and custom-made glenoid implant (ProMade; LimaCorporate, Italy). Computer analysis of the residual shape and the amount of glenoid bone stock in association with new classifications could help the surgeon to obtain good clinical and radiological outcomes. The development of navigation systems could improve the adequacy of the implant and, thus, the reliability and longevity of the implant itself.

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 2131-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Valenti ◽  
Johanna Sekri ◽  
Jean Kany ◽  
Imen Nidtahar ◽  
Jean-David Werthel

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5274
Author(s):  
Marko Nabergoj ◽  
Lionel Neyton ◽  
Hugo Bothorel ◽  
Sean W. L. Ho ◽  
Sidi Wang ◽  
...  

There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of patients who underwent RSA with severe glenoid bone loss requiring reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: BMA versus BA alone. Clinical outcome measurements included two years postoperative ROM, Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score. Radiological outcomes included radiographic evidence of scapular complications and graft incorporation. The BMA group had significantly different glenoid morphology (p < 0.001) and greater bone loss thickness than the BA group (16.3 ± 3.8 mm vs. 12.0 ± 0.0 mm, p = 0.020). Both groups had significantly improved ROM (anterior forward flexion and external rotation) and clinical scores (Constant, SSV and ASES scores) at 2 years. Greater improvement was observed in the BMA group in terms of anterior forward flexion (86.3° ± 27.9° vs. 43.8° ± 25.6°, p = 0.013) and Constant score (56.6 ± 10.1 vs. 38.3 ± 16.7, p = 0.021). The BA group demonstrated greater functional and clinical improvements with higher postoperative active external rotation and ASES results (active external rotation, 49.4° ± 17.0° vs. 29.4° ± 14.7°, p = 0.017; ASES, 89.1 ± 11.3 vs. 76.8 ± 11.0, p = 0.045). The combination use of bone graft and metallic augments in severe glenoid bone loss during RSA is safe and effective and can be considered in cases of severe glenoid bone loss where bone graft alone may be insufficient.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. e160-e161
Author(s):  
Ashish Gupta ◽  
Christoph Thussbas ◽  
Michael Koch ◽  
Ludwig Seebauer

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. e312-e319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan T. Formaini ◽  
Nathan G. Everding ◽  
Jonathan C. Levy ◽  
Brandon G. Santoni ◽  
Aniruddh N. Nayak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document