scholarly journals First known case of catatonia due to cyclosporine A-related neurotoxicity in a pediatric patient with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. David Heekin ◽  
Kalonda Bradshaw ◽  
Chadi A. Calarge
Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (49) ◽  
pp. e28186
Author(s):  
Juan Lv ◽  
Shizhi Luo ◽  
Yunxia Zhang ◽  
Enlai Dai

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Drube ◽  
Christoph Geerlings ◽  
Ruth Taylor ◽  
Michael Mengel ◽  
Jochen H. H. Ehrich

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 403-412
Author(s):  
Mohamed S. El-Farsy ◽  
Magid A. A. F. Ibrahim ◽  
Fathy N. Fatouh ◽  
Ahmed T. Abd El-Fattah

2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (15-16) ◽  
pp. 579-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danica Batinić ◽  
Danko Milošević ◽  
Boris Filipović-Grčić ◽  
Marija Topalović-Grković ◽  
Nina Barišić ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 407-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilsana Mulic ◽  
Gordana Milosevski-Lomic ◽  
Dusan Paripovic ◽  
Divna Kruscic ◽  
Mersudin Mulic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNF) is manifested at birth or within the first three months of life. The Finnish-type of CNF is caused by the mutation of the NPHS1 gene, which encodes nephrin in the podocyte slit diaphragm. It is a very severe disease, for which immunosuppressive therapy is not advised. Here we describe a patient with CNF who responded to CsA by partial remission. Case outline. A girl aged 2.5 months presented with severe non-syndromic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. She needed aggressive support including daily albumin infusions and diuretics. Substitution of vitamin D, thyroxin, and anticoagulants were regularly administered. She was also treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, without clear benefits regarding proteinuria. In addition, she received intravenous gamma-globulin replacement therapy and antibiotics during frequent infections. While waiting for the results of genetic analyses and faced with many problems related to daily albumin infusions, infections, and thromboembolic complications, cyclosporine A (CsA) was introduced as an alternative to early nephrectomy and consequent renal failure. The patient responded by partial remission and CsA treatment continued at home without the albumin infusions. After almost five years since the beginning of the treatment, the patient?s renal function remains unreduced. Conclusion. Our case demonstrates that CsA can induce partial remission in patients with genetic forms of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome without influencing the glomerular filtration rate. However, its long-term effect and safety should carefully be monitored.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Yan Li ◽  
Xialan Zhang ◽  
Tianbiao Zhou ◽  
Zhiqing Zhong ◽  
Hongzhen Zhong

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A (CsA) for patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Methods The Cochrane Library and PubMed were searched to extract the associated studies on Oct 10, 2018, and the meta-analysis method was used to pool and analyze the applicable investigations included in this study. The P(opulation) I(ntervention) C(omparison) O(utcome) of the study were defined as follows: P: Patients with SRNS; I: treated with CsA, cyclophosphamide (CYC), tacrolimus (TAC) or placebo/not treatment (P/NT); C: CsA vs. placebo/nontreatment (P/NT), CsA vs. CYC, CsA vs. TAC; O: complete remission (CR), total remission (TR; complete or partial remission (PR)), urine erythrocyte number, proteinuria levels, albumin, proteinuria, serum creatinine, and plasma cholesterol, etc. Data were extracted and pooled using RevMan 5.3. Results In the therapeutic regimen of CsA vs. placebo/nontreatment (P/NT), the results indicated that the CsA group had high values of CR, TR, and low values of proteinuria, serum creatinine, and plasma cholesterol when compared with those in the placebo group. In comparing CsA vs. cyclophosphamide (CYC), the results indicated that the CsA group had higher TR than the CYC group. In comparing CsA vs. tacrolimus (TAC), the results revealed insignificant differences in CR, and TR between the CsA and TAC groups. The safety of CsA was also assessed. The incidence of gum hyperplasia in CsA group was higher than that in the P/NT group, with no differences in incidence of infections or hypertension between CsA and P/NT groups. There was no difference in the incidence of hypertension between the CsA and TAC groups. Conclusions CsA is an effective and safe agent in the therapy of patients with SRNS.


2005 ◽  
Vol 205 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Tanaka ◽  
Koji Tsugawa ◽  
Tohru Nakahata ◽  
Masanobu Kudo ◽  
Shun-ichi Onuma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document