scholarly journals Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Yang Meng ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used to treat one- and two-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Studies have shown the effectiveness of CDR in preserving range of motion (ROM) and delaying adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Cervical sagittal alignment is an important factor affecting favorable clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. This study aimed to explore whether cervical sagittal alignment can be maintained after CDR and to identify the impact of cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes after CDR. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study. 132 patients who underwent one-level CDR were included. Cervical sagittal alignments, including cervical lordosis (CL), segmental alignment (SA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1s), and T1s minus CL (T1s-CL), were measured. The effects of cervical sagittal alignment on the CDR outcomes were analyzed. Patients were divided into the heterotopic ossification (HO) group and ASD group to determine the potential impacts of cervical sagittal parameters. Results The cervical sagittal alignment parameters, except for the SVA, were significantly improved after CDR and showed decreasing trends at the last follow-up. Significantly higher CL and T1s were found in patients with better ROM after CDR. SVA ≥ 20 mm increased the risk of anterior HO (odds ratio = 2.945, P = 0.007). Significantly kyphotic SA and lower T1s values were found in the ASD patients than in the non-ASD patients (P < 0.05). Patients with ASD at the inferior level showed significantly worse CL (P < 0.05). Conclusion CDR had limited function of improving cervical sagittal alignment. Poor cervical sagittal alignment after CDR was associated with HO, ASD, and less ROM.

scholarly journals Association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration and heterotopic ossification following cervical disc replacement with Prestige-LP disc

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902096829
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Yang Meng ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment

Purpose: Cervical sagittal balance plays important roles in transmitting the load of the head and maintaining global spinal balance. This study aimed to identify the association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and heterotopic ossification (HO) after Prestige-LP cervical disc replacement (CDR). Methods: We enrolled 132 patients who underwent one-level Prestige-LP CDR with 2–10 years of follow-up. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters, including the degree of C2–C7 lordosis (CL), functional spinal unit angle (FSUA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA),, and T1 slope (T1s), were measured. ASD and HO were evaluated at the last follow-up. Unpaired t tests and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the associations of cervical sagittal alignment with ASD and HO. Results: We found that patients who developed ASD showed significantly lower FSUA (2.1° vs. −1.4°, p < 0.001) and T1s values (28.4° vs. 25.5°, p = 0.029) after surgery. Similarly, the postoperative CL was significantly better in patients without ASD or HO (18.0° vs. 14.4°, p = 0.043). The decrease in the T1s at the last follow-up was significantly larger in the patients with ASD (−11.0° vs. −3.2°, p = 0.003), HO (−6.7° vs. −2.7°, p = 0.050), and ASD or HO (−7.0° vs. −0.8°, p < 0.001) than in those without ASD or HO. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both the FSUA and T1s are associated with ASD and that the degree of CL is associated with postoperative complications. Conclusion: The results imply that maintaining cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige-LP CDR is important.

scholarly journals Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Jörg Meisel ◽  
Lubomír Jurák ◽  
Jussi Antinheimo ◽  
Ricardo Arregui ◽  
Bernhard Bruchmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Disc Replacement ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Radiographic Outcome ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Facet Joint Degeneration

OBJECTIVE Recent studies have described encouraging outcomes after cervical total disc replacement (cTDR), but there are also critical debates regarding the long-term effects of heterotopic ossification (HO) and the prevalence of adjacent-level degeneration. The aim in this paper was to provide 4-year clinical and radiographic outcome results on the activ C disc prosthesis. METHODS A total of 200 subjects underwent single-level activ C (Aesculap AG) implantation between C-3 and C-7 for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge, and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years. Radiographic evaluations were done by an independent core laboratory using a specific software for quantitative motion analysis. RESULTS Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck and arm pain decreased significantly from baseline to the 4-year follow-up. The mean improvement for NDI was 20, for VAS severity and frequency of neck pain 26.4 and 28, and for VAS severity and frequency of arm pain 30.7 and 35.1, respectively. The neurological situation improved for the majority of patients (86.4%); 76.1% of cases were asymptomatic. Subsequent surgical interventions were reported in 7% of the cases, including device removals in 3%. In 2.5% a subsidence greater than 3 mm was recorded; 1 of these cases also had a migration greater than 3 mm. No device displacement, expulsion, disassembly, loose or fractured device, osteolysis, or facet joint degeneration at the index level was observed. Segmental lordotic alignment changed from −2.4° preoperatively to −6.2° at 4 years, and postoperative height was maintained during the follow-up. Advanced HO (Grade III and IV) was present in 27.1% of the cases; 82.4% showed segmental mobility. A progression of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration occurred in 28.2%, but only 4.5% required surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS The activ C is a safe and effective device for cervical disc replacement confirming the encouraging results after cTDR. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02492724 (clinicaltrials.gov)

scholarly journals Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year’s results

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 934-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Nabhan ◽  
B. Ishak ◽  
W. I. Steudel ◽  
S. Ramadhan ◽  
O. Steimer
Keyword(s):  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement

scholarly journals The impact of smoking on outcomes following anterior cervical fusion-nonfusion hybrid surgery: a retrospective single-center cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Wang ◽  
Yang Meng ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Ying Hong
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Hybrid Surgery ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Early Fusion ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background There is mixed evidence for the impact of cigarette smoking on outcomes following anterior cervical surgery. It has been reported to have a negative impact on healing after multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, however, segmental mobility has been suggested to be superior in smokers who underwent one- or two-level cervical disc replacement. Hybrid surgery, including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc replacement, has emerged as an alternative procedure for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to examine the impact of smoking on intermediate-term outcomes following hybrid surgery. Methods Radiographical and clinical outcomes of 153 patients who had undergone continuous two- or three-level hybrid surgery were followed-up to a minimum of 2-years post-operatively. The early fusion effect, 1-year fusion rate, the incidence of bone loss and heterotopic ossification, as well as the clinical outcomes were compared across three smoking status groups: (1) current smokers; (2) former smokers; (3) nonsmokers. Results Clinical outcomes were comparable among the three groups. However, the current smoking group had a poorer early fusion effect and 1-year fusion rate (P < 0.001 and P < 0.035 respectively). Both gender and smoking status were considered as key factors for 1-year fusion rate. Upon multivariable analysis, male gender (OR = 6.664, 95% CI: 1.248–35.581, P = 0.026) and current smoking status (OR = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.020–0.411, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with 1-year fusion rate. A subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in both early fusion process (P < 0.001) and the 1-year fusion rate (P = 0.006) across the three smoking status groups in female patients. Finally, non-smoking status appeared to be protective against bone loss (OR = 0.427, 95% CI: 0.192–0.947, P = 0.036), with these patients likely to have at least one grade lower bone loss than current smokers. Conclusions Smoking is associated with poor outcomes following hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical disc disease. Current smokers had the poorest fusion rate and most bone loss, but no statistically significant differences were seen in clinical outcomes across the three groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document