scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators for clinical trial participation among diverse Asian patients with breast cancer: a qualitative study

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guek Eng Lee ◽  
Mandy Ow ◽  
Desiree Lie ◽  
Rebecca Dent
2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn P. Quinn ◽  
Alexis Koskan ◽  
Kristen J. Wells ◽  
Luis E. Gonzalez ◽  
Cathy D. Meade ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly L Peay ◽  
Barbara B Biesecker ◽  
Benjamin S Wilfond ◽  
Jill Jarecki ◽  
Kendall L Umstead ◽  
...  

Background/aims: Pediatric rare disease presents a challenging situation of high unmet need and a limited pool of potential clinical trial participants. Understanding perspectives of parents of children who have not participated in trials may facilitate approaches to optimize participation rates. The objective of this study was to explore factors associated with parental interest in enrolling children with pediatric neuromuscular disorders in clinical trials. Methods: Parents of individuals with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy were recruited through advocacy organizations, a registry, and clinics. These parents ( N = 203) completed a questionnaire including assessments of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation, parents’ interest in trial participation, and their perceptions of others’ views about participation in a clinical trial. Results: Trial interest in participating parents was high (64% combined group). The most highly endorsed barrier to participation was the possibility of receiving placebo, followed by not having enough information on risks and trial procedures. Compared to parents of children with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy, parents of children with spinal muscular atrophy endorsed significantly more information and knowledge barriers. The greatest facilitators of participation were (1) confidence in improving disease understanding and (2) guarantee to receive the treatment after a successful trial. A logistic regression model, χ2 (4, n = 188) = 80.64, p < .001, indicated that higher perceived barriers and more frequent trial communication by the provider were associated with lower interest, while positive trial perceptions by the child’s providers and concordance in trial perceptions among those close to the decision-maker were associated with higher interest. Conclusion: We found high parental interest in pediatric neuromuscular trials that was tempered by concerns about the potential for randomization to a placebo arm. Participants perceived that their trial participation would be facilitated by additional education and guidance from their clinicians. Yet, intentions were negatively associated with frequency of provider communication, perhaps reflecting waning parental interest with a greater understanding of limitations in trial access, increased sophistication in their understanding of trial design, and appreciation of potential burden. To support parents’ informed decisions, it is important to educate them to evaluate the quality of research, as well as providing lay information explaining the use of placebo, trial processes, and potential barriers to long-term drug access. Our findings should inform the development of targeted educational content, clinician training, and decision support tools.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14031-e14031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Zdenkowski ◽  
James F. Lynam ◽  
Laura Wall ◽  
Scott Brown ◽  
Kathryn Wells ◽  
...  

e14031 Background: The option of clinical trial participation is an important component of high quality care for oncology patients. Despite a recognised need for generalizable research results to guide future practice, and the desire of current oncology patients to participate in trials, only 2-5% of oncology patients in developed nations enroll in a clinical trial. We aimed to determine the willingness of patients to travel, change location and/or clinician to participate in a clinical trial. Methods: Members of a national breast cancer consumer organization were invited by email to respond to an online cross-sectional survey. Questions included demographics, remoteness of residence, prior involvement in clinical trials and location of usual care. This was followed by a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) comprising an introduction and 10 hypothetical scenarios to test the effect of variation in travel time, clinician, treating centre, travel cost and type of trial. Results: Between July and August 2016, 288 responses were received, mean age 58. 86% had early stage disease, 51% were currently receiving treatment, 21% had prior clinical trial involvement. Ninety percent were willing to participate in a clinical trial in at least one scenario. Factors that decreased the likelihood of interest in clinical trial participation were increasing travel time, change in oncologist and out of pocket expenses. Type of trial (randomised placebo controlled; randomised open label; single arm) did not influence the decision. If the oncologist remained the same and there were no costs, respondents were willing to travel a mean extra 127 minutes, however if the oncologist changed and there were additional costs, they were willing to travel a mean of 30 minutes. If the oncologist changed and there was no cost, they were willing to travel a mean of 82 minutes. Conclusions: This group of respondents with a past history of breast cancer expressed interest in clinical trial participation, however willingness to travel in the most likely scenario (change oncologist and pay no additional cost) was 82 minutes. To facilitate optimal access to clinical trials, clinicians should consider referral within and between institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document