scholarly journals Motivating smokers at outdoor public smoking hotspots to have a quit attempt with a nicotine replacement therapy sample: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yee Tak Derek Cheung ◽  
Jessica Pui Kei Leung ◽  
Chelsia Ka Ching Cheung ◽  
William Ho Cheung Li ◽  
Man Ping Wang ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Cunningham ◽  
Scott T Leatherdale ◽  
Peter L Selby ◽  
Rachel F Tyndale ◽  
Laurie Zawertailo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abu S. Abdullah ◽  
Anthony J. Hedley ◽  
Sophia S. C. Chan ◽  
Tai-Hing Lam

This study examined if 2-week free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) would be more effective than 1-week free NRT to help smokers quit smoking at 6 and 12 months. In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial design, 562 Chinese smokers who attended a smoking cessation clinic in Hong Kong, China, were randomly allocated into two groups (A1 and A2): A1 (n=284) received behavioural counselling with free NRT for 1 week; A2 (n=278) received similar counselling with free NRT for 2 weeks. All subjects received printed self-help materials to support their quitting efforts. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection, including pattern of NRT use and self-reported 7-day point prevalence quit rate at 6 months and 12 months. Among the participants, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day was 18.8 (SD=10.9). By intention-to-treat analysis, 7-day point prevalence quit rates were not significantly different between A1 and A2 groups at 6-month (27.5% versus 27.3%;P=0.97) and 12-month (21.1% versus 21.2%;P=0.98) followup. The findings suggest that two-week free NRT was not more effective than 1-week free NRT to increase smoking cessation rate among Chinese smokers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document