scholarly journals Social affiliation motives modulate spontaneous learning in Williams syndrome but not in autism

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Vivanti ◽  
Darren R. Hocking ◽  
Peter Fanning ◽  
Cheryl Dissanayake
1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Howlin ◽  
Mark Davies ◽  
Orlee Udwin

Author(s):  
Wendy Jones ◽  
John Hesselink ◽  
Eric Courchesne ◽  
Tim Duncan ◽  
Kevin Matsuda ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (09) ◽  
pp. 617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho Nakamura ◽  
Kazuyoshi Watanabe ◽  
Akiko Matsumoto ◽  
Tsutomu Yamanaka ◽  
Toshiyuki Kumagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
Gérald Delelis ◽  
Véronique Christophe

Abstract. After experiencing an emotional event, people either seek out others’ presence (social affiliation) or avoid others’ presence (social isolation). The determinants and effects of social affiliation are now well-known, but social psychologists have not yet thoroughly studied social isolation. This study aims to ascertain which motives and corresponding regulation strategies participants report for social isolation following negative emotional events. A group of 96 participants retrieved from memory an actual negative event that led them to temporarily socially isolate themselves and freely listed up to 10 motives for social isolation. Through semantic categorization of the 423 motives reported by the participants, we found that “cognitive clarification” and “keeping one’s distance” – that is, the need for cognitive regulation and the refusal of socioaffective regulation, respectively – were the most commonly and quickly reported motives for social isolation. We discuss the findings in terms of ideas for future studies aimed at clarifying the role of social isolation in health situations.


Author(s):  
Stefanie J. Sharman ◽  
Samantha Calacouris

People are motivated to remember past autobiographical experiences related to their current goals; we investigated whether people are also motivated to remember false past experiences related to those goals. In Session 1, we measured subjects’ implicit and explicit achievement and affiliation motives. Subjects then rated their confidence about, and memory for, childhood events containing achievement and affiliation themes. Two weeks later in Session 2, subjects received a “computer-generated profile” based on their Session 1 ratings. This profile suggested that one false achievement event and one false affiliation event had happened in childhood. After imagining and describing the suggested false events, subjects made confidence and memory ratings a second time. For achievement events, subjects’ explicit motives predicted their false beliefs and memories. The results are explained using source monitoring and a motivational model of autobiographical memory.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Goolkasian
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Barbara Landau ◽  
Laura Lakusta ◽  
Banchiamlack Dessalegn
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document