scholarly journals Prospective data-driven respiratory gating of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sigfridsson ◽  
Elin Lindström ◽  
Victor Iyer ◽  
Maria Holstensson ◽  
Irina Velikyan ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate a data-driven gating software’s performance, in terms of identifying the respiratory signal, comparing [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC and [18F]FDG examinations. In addition, for the [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC examinations, tracer uptake quantitation and liver lesion detectability were assessed. Methods Twenty-four patients with confirmed or suspected neuroendocrine tumours underwent whole-body [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT examinations. Prospective DDG was applied on all bed positions and respiratory motion correction was triggered automatically when the detected respiratory signal exceeded a certain threshold (R value ≥ 15), at which point the scan time for that bed position was doubled. These bed positions were reconstructed with quiescent period gating (QPG), retaining 50% of the total coincidences. A respiratory signal evaluation regarding the software’s efficacy in detecting respiratory motion for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC was conducted and compared to [18F]FDG data. Measurements of SUVmax, SUVmean, and tumour volume were performed on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET and compared between gated and non-gated images. Results The threshold of R ≥ 15 was exceeded and gating triggered on mean 2.1 bed positions per examination for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC as compared to 1.4 for [18F]FDG. In total, 34 tumours were evaluated in a quantitative analysis. An increase of 25.3% and 28.1%, respectively, for SUVmax (P < 0.0001) and SUVmean (P < 0.0001), and decrease of 21.1% in tumour volume (P < 0.0001) was found when DDG was applied. Conclusions High respiratory signal was exclusively detected in bed positions where respiratory motion was expected, indicating reliable performance of the DDG software on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. DDG yielded significantly higher SUVmax and SUVmean values and smaller tumour volumes, as compared to non-gated images.

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 1356-1365
Author(s):  
Kenta Miwa ◽  
Noriaki Miyaji ◽  
Kosuke Yamashita ◽  
Tensho Yamao ◽  
Yuto Kamitaka

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1678-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Walker ◽  
Andrew J. Morgan ◽  
Kevin M. Bradley ◽  
Daniel R. McGowan

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1935-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J Schleyer ◽  
Michael J O'Doherty ◽  
Sally F Barrington ◽  
Paul K Marsden

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2216-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lyngby Lassen ◽  
Thomas Beyer ◽  
Alexander Berger ◽  
Dietrich Beitzke ◽  
Sazan Rasul ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Wiesmüller ◽  
Harald H. Quick ◽  
Bharath Navalpakkam ◽  
Michael M. Lell ◽  
Michael Uder ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 193 (6) ◽  
pp. 1640-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias K. Werner ◽  
J. Anthony Parker ◽  
Gerald M. Kolodny ◽  
Jeffrey R. English ◽  
Matthew R. Palmer

2021 ◽  
pp. 20201350
Author(s):  
Michael Messerli ◽  
Virginia Liberini ◽  
Hannes Grünig ◽  
Alexander Maurer ◽  
Stephan Skawran ◽  
...  

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of fully automatic motion correction by data-driven respiratory gating (DDG) on positron emission tomography (PET) image quality, lesion detection and patient management. Materials and Methods: A total of 149 patients undergoing PET/CT for cancer (re-)staging were retrospectively included. Patients underwent a PET/CT on a digital detector scanner and for every patient a PET data set where DDG was enabled (PETDDG) and as well as where DDG was not enabled (PETnonDDG) was reconstructed. All PET data sets were evaluated by two readers which rated the general image quality, motion effects and organ contours. Further, both readers reviewed all scans on a case-by-case basis and evaluated the impact of PETDDG on additional apparent lesion, change of report, and change of management. Results: In 85% (n = 126) of the patients, at least one bed position was acquired using DDG, resulting in mean scan time increase of 4:37 min per patient in the whole study cohort (n = 149). General image quality was not rated differently for PETnonDDG and PETDDG images (p = 1.000) while motion effects (i.e. indicating general blurring) was rated significantly lower in PETDDG images and organ contours, including liver and spleen, were rated significantly sharper using PETDDG as compared to PETnonDDG (all p < 0.001). In 27% of patients, PETDDG resulted in a change of the report and in a total of 12 cases (8%), PETDDG resulted in a change of further clinical management. Conclusion: Deviceless DDG provided reliable fully automatic motion correction in clinical routine and increased lesion detectability and changed management in a considerable number of patients. Advances in knowledge: DDG enables PET/CT with respiratory gating to be used routinely in clinical practice without external gating equipment needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document