scholarly journals The applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery: protocol of a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelos Mantelakis ◽  
Ankur Khajuria
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mantelakis

Abstract Background Machine learning (ML) is a set of models and methods that can automatically detect patterns in vast amounts of data and use this information to perform various kinds of decision-making under uncertain conditions. The aim of this review is to evaluate the applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Method EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched from 1990 to 2020 for studies in which machine learning has been employed in the clinical setting of reconstructive surgery. Primary outcomes will be the evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning models in predicting a clinical diagnosis and post-surgical outcomes. Results The database identified 1181 articles, of which 51 articles were included in this review. The clinical utility of these algorithms was to assist clinicians in diagnosis prediction (n = 22), outcome prediction (n = 21) and pre-operative planning (n = 8). The mean accuracy for diagnosis prediction, outcome prediction and pre-operative planning was 88.80%, 86.11% and 80.28% respectively. The most commonly used models were neural networks (n = 31), support vector machine (n = 13), decision trees/random forests (10) and logistic regression (n = 9). Discussion ML has demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosis and outcome predictions, but it is still in its infancy. Further research is warranted to evaluate its applications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
Shweta Kedia ◽  
Bhavya Pahwa ◽  
Ojasvini Bali ◽  
Sarvesh Goyal

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-712
Author(s):  
Christian Tapking ◽  
Alexis L. Boson ◽  
Victoria G. Rontoyanni ◽  
Karl F. Kowalewski ◽  
Gabriel Hundeshagen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 736-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna S. Vyas ◽  
H. Rhodes Hambrick ◽  
Afaaf Shakir ◽  
Shane D. Morrison ◽  
Duy C. Tran ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. M. Knoops ◽  
Athanasios Papaioannou ◽  
Alessandro Borghi ◽  
Richard W. F. Breakey ◽  
Alexander T. Wilson ◽  
...  

Abstract Current computational tools for planning and simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery lack sufficient precision and are time-consuming, thus resulting in limited adoption. Although computer-assisted surgical planning systems help to improve clinical outcomes, shorten operation time and reduce cost, they are often too complex and require extensive manual input, which ultimately limits their use in doctor-patient communication and clinical decision making. Here, we present the first large-scale clinical 3D morphable model, a machine-learning-based framework involving supervised learning for diagnostics, risk stratification, and treatment simulation. The model, trained and validated with 4,261 faces of healthy volunteers and orthognathic (jaw) surgery patients, diagnoses patients with 95.5% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity, and simulates surgical outcomes with a mean accuracy of 1.1 ± 0.3 mm. We demonstrate how this model could fully-automatically aid diagnosis and provide patient-specific treatment plans from a 3D scan alone, to help efficient clinical decision making and improve clinical understanding of face shape as a marker for primary and secondary surgery.


JPRAS Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Nehme ◽  
Jonathan James Neville ◽  
Ali Nehme Bahsoun

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (04) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidong Weng ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
William Lineaweaver ◽  
Weiyang Gao ◽  
Hede Yan

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1022-1034
Author(s):  
Malke Asaad ◽  
Jacob K Dey ◽  
Ahmad Al-Mouakeh ◽  
Mohamad Baraa Manjouna ◽  
Mohammad A Nashed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The use of eye-tracking technology in plastic surgery has gained popularity over the past decade due to its ability to assess observers’ visual preferences in an objective manner. Objectives The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of eye-tracking studies in plastic and reconstructive surgery, which can aid in the design and conduct of high-quality eye-tracking studies. Methods Through application of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of articles published on eye-tracking across several databases was conducted from January 1946 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria included studies evaluating the use of eye-tracking technology in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The resulting publications were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Results A total of 595 articles were identified, 23 of which met our inclusion criteria. The most common application of eye-tracking was to assess individuals with cleft lip/palate (9 studies). All 19 studies that evaluated fixation patterns among conditions vs controls reported significant differences between the 2 groups. Five out of 7 studies assessing visual data between preoperative and postoperative patients identified significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative groups, whereas 2 studies did not. Nine studies examined the relation between severity indices, attractiveness scores, or personality ratings and gaze patterns. Correlation was found in 7 out of the 9 studies. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates the utility of eye-tracking technology as a quantifiable objective assessment and emerging research tool for evaluating outcomes in several domains of plastic and reconstructive surgery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 519-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yena Lee ◽  
Renee-Marie Ragguett ◽  
Rodrigo B. Mansur ◽  
Justin J. Boutilier ◽  
Joshua D. Rosenblat ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document