scholarly journals The effectiveness of specialized legal counsel and case management services for indigent offenders with mental illness

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bouffard ◽  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Gaylene S. Armstrong
1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Draine ◽  
Phyllis Solomon

Sixty-five homeless mentally ill clients leaving jail were followed into the community for six months after being assigned an intensive case manager upon leaving jail. With demographic and clinical controls, service intensity variables were entered into an event history analysis to predict jail recidivism by service month. Less satisfaction with quality of life, fewer case management services provided in clients' homes, more service time face to face with case managers, and more services involving interaction with other providers were associated with return to jail within six months. Special attention needs to be paid to the appropriate intensity of services and the overreliance of public mental health service providers on monitoring, as opposed to treatment for forensic clients with mental illness, who are especially vulnerable to the stresses of poverty, addiction, homelessness and arrest.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Eno Louden ◽  
Sarah M. Manchak ◽  
Elijah P. Ricks ◽  
Patrick J. Kennealy

Recommendations for supervising offenders with mental illness have evolved from a narrow focus on treating psychopathology to an integration of mental health treatment and correctional interventions. Probation officers likely have inflated perceptions of risk for offenders with mental illness, which may result in improper risk assessment and misinformed risk management practices. In a sample of 89 probation officers, we examined perceptions of risk for probationers with and without mental illness and explored whether stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness affect perceptions of risk and risk management strategies. Officers did not overestimate risk for offenders with mental illness, and stigma toward mental illness bore little influence on risk ratings and case management decisions. However, officers did rate the offender with mental illness as higher risk than the nondisordered offender and chose more punitive responses to a violation he committed—despite being informed that the offenders were of the same risk classification.


Author(s):  
H. Virginia McCoy ◽  
◽  
Sally Dodds ◽  
James E. Rivers ◽  
Clyde B. McCoy

Author(s):  
Shelli B. Rossman ◽  
Janeen Buck Willison ◽  
Kamala Mallik-Kane ◽  
KiDeuk Kim ◽  
Sara Debus-Sherrill ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Morgan ◽  
Naihua Duan ◽  
William Fisher ◽  
Christopher Romani ◽  
Jon Mandracchia ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 665-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly R. Jacob Arriola ◽  
Ronald L. Braithwaite ◽  
Elizabeth. Holmes ◽  
Renata M. Fortenberry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document