scholarly journals Peripheral and local predictive immune signatures identified in a phase II trial of ipilimumab with carboplatin/paclitaxel in unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma

Author(s):  
Rahima Jamal ◽  
Réjean Lapointe ◽  
Eftihia Cocolakis ◽  
Paméla Thébault ◽  
Shirin Kazemi ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 117 (8) ◽  
pp. 1704-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Kottschade ◽  
Vera J. Suman ◽  
Thomas Amatruda ◽  
Robert R. McWilliams ◽  
Bassam I. Mattar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8524-8524 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Fruehauf ◽  
Beverly Alger ◽  
Basmina Parmakhtiar ◽  
James G. Jakowatz ◽  
Claudette Bettis ◽  
...  

8524 Background: Metastatic melanoma lacks effective therapy. Pazopanib is a small-molecule inhibitor of VEGFR-1,2,3, PDGFR-B and c-KIT that has antiangiogenic activity in renal cell cancer as well as inhibition of melanoma tumor xenografts. We designed a phase II single arm, open label clinical trial evaluating pazopanib in combination with metronomic paclitaxel as first line therapy for subjects with unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma. Methods: This protocol utilizes a Simon 2-stage Minimax design, with a planned interim analysis to confirm >3 responders to move to the second stage. To date, 20 eligible patients have been enrolled with 17 evaluable for response. All subjects were treatment naïve and received paclitaxel at 80mg/m2 weekly for three weeks in a 4 week cycle and pazopanib at 800mg as a continuous daily oral dose. The primary endpoint is 6 month progression free survival. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker analysis that may be associated with treatment outcomes (serum VEGF, soluble VEGF R2, serum HIF, serum TSP1 and BRAF mutation status). An additional exploratory endpoint includes the in vitro activity of pazopanib and paclitaxel on patient biopsy material co-cultured with vascular endothelial cells. RECIST criteria were used to define treatment response. Results: For the 17 evaluable patients treated to date the following results were seen: 1 CR, 6 PR’s, 8 SD’s and 2 PD’s. The overall RR (CR+PR) was 40%. Total disease control rate was 80% (PR+SD). The most common AEs/lab abnormalities were nausea (71%), hypertension (57%), fatigue (57%) and vomiting (43%). Grade 3-4 AEs included hypertension (28%), transaminitis (21%) and neutropenia (14%). One patient discontinued for grade 4 transaminitis which subsequently resolved completely. Dose reductions were required for pazopanib in 5 patients and for paclitaxel in one patient. Conclusions: Planned interim analysis of this phase II study demonstrated that pazopanib in combination with paclitaxel was well tolerated and resulted in a 40% response rate, indicating that this combination is of further interest. Accrual will continue to reach a goal of 60 patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9009-9009 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Tarhini ◽  
S. S. Moschos ◽  
J. J. Schlesselman ◽  
J. Shope-Spotloe ◽  
M. Demark ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9044-9044
Author(s):  
L. A. Kottschade ◽  
V. J. Suman ◽  
T. Amatruda ◽  
R. R. McWilliams ◽  
S. R. Dakhil ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sucheta Telang ◽  
Mary Ann Rasku ◽  
Amy L Clem ◽  
Karen Carter ◽  
Alden C Klarer ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9055-9055
Author(s):  
S. N. Markovic ◽  
V. J. Suman ◽  
L. A. Kottschade ◽  
T. Amatruda ◽  
R. R. McWilliams ◽  
...  

9055 Background: There is increasing evidence that paclitaxel and carboplatin are clinically active in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM). Nab-P is an albumin-bound paclitaxel with ability to bind SPARC (secreted protein acid rich in cysteine), that is overexpressed in MM and associated with poor prognosis. This study explores the clinical activity of the combination of nab-P and C in patients (pts) with stage IV melanoma and SPARC correlatives. Methods: A parallel phase II trial was conducted in pts with unresectable stage IV melanoma, who were either chemotherapy naïve (CN) or were previously treated (PT). A treatment regimen consisting of nab-P (100 mg/m2) and C (AUC 2) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether tumor response rate (CR + PR by RECIST) was ≤15% vs ≥35% in the CN group and ≤5% vs ≥ 20% in the PT cohort. Major eligibility criteria: ≥18 years of age, ECOG PS ≤2, adequate organ function, platinum or taxane naive, peripheral neuropathy < grade 2, and no untreated brain metastasis; no pregnant and/or nursing women. Tumor tissue was tested for SPARC and level 3 immunohistochemical staining was considered positive. Results: 76 pts (41-CN and 35 PT) enrolled from 11/2006 - 7/2007, 3 pts (2-CN, 1-PT) cancelled prior to starting treatment. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range 1–18-CN and 1–10-PT). There were 11 (28.2%) confirmed responses (1 CR and 10 PRs) in the CN cohort (90% CI: 16.7–42.3%) and 3 (8.8%) confirmed responses (3 PRs) in the PT cohort (90% CI: 2.5–21.3%). Median PFS was 4.5 months (CN) and 4.1 months (PT). Median OS was 11.1 months (CN) and 10.9 months (PT).The most common severe toxicities in both groups (CTCAE ≥ grade 3) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuro-sensory, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. PFS was not affected by SPARC positivity; however, based on limited data there is some evidence that OS may be longer with tumoral SPARC positivity (10.0 vs 12.8 mo; SPARC negative vs SPARC positive). Conclusions: The weekly combination of nab-P and C appears to be well tolerated with promising clinical activity as front line or salvage therapy in pts with MM. SPARC positivity may be associated with improved OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document