scholarly journals Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Eslami ◽  
Jorge Faber ◽  
Ali Fateh ◽  
Farnaz Sheikholaemmeh ◽  
Vincenzo Grassia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion

scholarly journals Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiting Chen ◽  
Kaili Zhang ◽  
Dongxu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Bone Thickness ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Palatal Bone

Abstract Background Maxillary skeletal expanders (MSE) is effective for the treatment of maxillary transverse deformity. The purpose of the study was to analyse the palatal bone thickness in the of MSE implantation in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. Methods A total of 80 adult patients (40 males, 40 females) with an average angle before treatment were divided into two groups, the skeletal class III malocclusion group and the skeletal I malocclusion group, based on sagittal facial type. Each group consisted of 40 patients, with a male to female ratio of 1:1. A cone-beam computed tomography scanner was employed to obtain DICOM data for all patients. The palatal bone thickness was measured at 45 sites with MIMICS 21.0 software, and SPSS 22.0 software was employed for statistical analysis. The bone thickness at different regions of the palate in the same group was analysed with one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Fisher’s least significant difference-t method was used for the comparison of pairs, and independent sample t test was employed to determine the significance of differences in the bone thickness at the same sites between the two groups. Results Palatal bone thickness was greater in the middle region of the midline area (P < 0.01), while the thickness in the middle and lateral areas in both groups was generally lower (P < 0.001). The bone in the anterior, middle, and posterior regions of the two groups became increasingly thin from the middle area toward the parapalatine region. The palatal bone was significantly thinner in the area 9.0 mm before the transverse palatine suture in the midline area, 9.0 mm before and after the transverse palatine suture in the middle area, and 9.0 mm after the transverse palatine suture in the lateral area. Conclusion The palatal bone was thinner in patients with class III malocclusion than in patients with class I malocclusion, with significant differences in some areas. The differences in bone thickness should be considered when MSE miniscrews are implanted. The anterior and middle palatal areas are safer for the implantation of miniscrews, while the thinness of the posterior palatal bone increases the risk of the miniscrews falling off and perforating.

scholarly journals Orthodontic camouflage as a treatment alternative for skeletal Class III

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Tirre de Souza ARAUJO ◽  
Luciana Rougemont SQUEFF
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Complex Treatment ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Treatment Alternative ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Facial Esthetics ◽  
The Ideal

ABSTRACT Introduction: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is a deformity of complex treatment, with few intervention alternatives, which are further limited in nongrowing patients. In most cases, orthognathic surgery is the ideal treatment for adults, an option often refused by patients. Mild to moderate skeletal Class III malocclusions and acceptable facial esthetics can benefit from a course of treatment in which dental movements are used to compensate for the skeletal discrepancy. Objective: This study aimed to discuss orthodontic camouflage as an option for adult patients with Class III malocclusion, emphasizing its indications, implications and expected results.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary Orthodontic and Surgical Management of Class III Malocclusion in Adult Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Camelia Szuhanek ◽  
Stefania Dumitrescu ◽  
Eduard Paraschivescu ◽  
Riham Nagib
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Main Complaint ◽  
Facial Esthetics ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Old Adult ◽  
Removable Appliances ◽  
Dentoalveolar Compensation

The treatment of class III malocclusion differs depending on the age of the patient. In adult patients, alternatives include either orthodontic dentoalveolar compensation treatment or a combined ortho-surgical approach. The aim of this paper is to present the orthodontic and surgical treatment of a 24 year old adult patient with increased anterior face height, a class III skeletal pattern and mandibular asymetry. Previous orthodontic treatment with removable appliances obtained a 1 mm overbite and overjet. Intraorally, class III molar relationship was observed, proclined upper incisors, retroclined lower incisors and a deviated lower midline. The main complaint was facial esthetics which required surgical intevention. After pre-surgical orthodontic preparation the maxilla was repositioned by a Le Fort I osteotomy and the mandible was set back using the Obwegeser-Dal Pont method. Final assesment revealed both functional and esthetic dentofacial results. A combination of orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery is often required in adult patients with dental malocclusion and skeletal discrepancies.

scholarly journals A Comparative Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes of Mild Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Between Facemask and Facemask in Combination with a Miniscrew For Anchorage in Growing Patients: A Single-center, Prospective Randomized Controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Seiryu ◽  
Hiroto Ida ◽  
Atsushi Mayama ◽  
Satoshi Sasaki ◽  
Shutaro Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group 12 ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Group A ◽  
Negative Side Effects

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate the hypothesis that there is difference in the treatment outcomes of milder skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew in growing patients. Materials and Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In one group, the patients were treated with facemask therapy (FM group: 12 males, eight females, average age: 10 years, 5 months ± 1 year, 8 months). In the other group, patients were treated with facemask therapy along with a miniscrew (FM+MS group: 12 males, seven females, average age: 11 years, 1 month ± 1 year, 3 months). A lingual arch with hooks was fixed to the maxillary arch in both groups and a protractive force of 500 g was applied from the facemask to the hooks. The patients were instructed to use the facemask for 12 hours per day. In the FM+MS group, a miniscrew was inserted into the palate and fixed to the lingual arch. Results Mobility and loosening of the miniscrew were not observed during treatment. Lateral cephalometric analysis showed that SNA, SN-ANS, and ANB values were significantly increased in the FM+MS group compared with those for the FM group (SNA, 1.1° SN-ANS, 1.3° ANB, 0.8°). Increase in proclination of maxillary incisors was significantly greater in the FM group than in the FM+MS group (U1-SN, 5.0°). Conclusions During treatment of milder skeletal Class III malocclusion, facemask therapy along with a miniscrew exhibits fewer negative side effects and delivers orthopedic forces more efficiently to the maxillary complex than facemask therapy alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document