scholarly journals Effectiveness of measuring tension during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Yokoya ◽  
Yoshihiro Nakamura ◽  
Yohei Harada ◽  
Hiroshi Negi ◽  
Ryosuke Matsushita ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for relatively small rotator cuff tears (RCTs) has shown promising results; however, such surgery for larger tears often results in failure and poor clinical outcomes. One cause of failure is over-tension at the repair site that will be covered with the tendon stump. Reports on the clinical outcomes using ARCR with tension ≤ 30 N are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate ARCR outcomes and failure rates using less tension (30 N) and to assess the prognostic factors for failure. Methods Our study group comprised of 118 patients who underwent ARCR for full-thickness RCTs with full tendon stump coverage of the footprint with a tension of ≤ 30 N, measured using a tension meter; no additional procedures, such as margin convergence or footprint medialisation, were performed. The failure rate was calculated, and the prognostic factor for failure was assessed using multivariate regression analyses. Results There were seven cases of failure in the study group. Postoperatively, flexion and internal rotation ranges of motion, acromiohumeral interval, muscle strength, and clinical results improved significantly. Using multivariate regression analyses, intraoperative concomitant subscapularis tendon lesion and pre-operative infraspinatus tendon retraction, assessed using radial-sequence magnetic resonance imaging, were significantly correlated with post-ARCR failure using less tension (p = 0.030 and p = 0.031, respectively). Conclusion ARCR is likely to succeed for RCTs that can be extracted using tension ≤ 30 N. However, cases with more severe subscapularis tendon lesions and those with high infraspinatus tendon retraction may show surgical failure. Level of evidence LEVEL IV Retrospective case series

Author(s):  
Junqi Huang ◽  
Jiajia Cheng ◽  
Shitian Tang ◽  
Bo Shi ◽  
Gang Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has recently been popularized for treating tears. In a biomechanical trial, the Mason-Allen stitch improved the fixation quality of poorly vascularized tendons. The use of this technique involving the subscapularis tendon remains rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Mason-Allen technique repaired subscapularis tendons. Methods A retrospective research of collected data from 98 patients with subscapularis tears who had undergone arthroscopic repair between May 2015 and December 2018. There were 75 males and 23 females. The mean age was 56.4 ± 9.6 years and the mean follow-up was 12.5 ± 4.0 months. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Constant-Murley score were used to analyze shoulder function. An MRI was performed to assess the integrity of the repair. Results Patients had significantly less pain and a better active range of motion compared with preoperative levels. VAS improved significantly from a preoperative mean of 3.42 to a postoperative mean of 1.91. ASES increased significantly from the preoperative mean of 43.6 to the postoperative mean of 74.5. Seven cases suffered from retears, which were confirmed by an MRI examination. Conclusion Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the Mason-Allen method resulted in a decreased level of pain and satisfied function recovery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0017
Author(s):  
Luke Austin ◽  
Charles Dante Wowkanech ◽  
Bret Cypel ◽  
Eric Gordon Alyea ◽  
Tara Gaston ◽  
...  

Objectives: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) is a rare complication following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Historical rates of symptomatic VTED after arthroscopic shoulder surgery, DVT and PE, are 0.26%, and 0.01-0.21%, respectively. At present, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) have no prophylaxis guidelines specific to shoulder arthroscopy. Despite this, many surgeons prescribe Aspirin (ASA) for chemical prophylaxis following RCR. The efficacy of ASA as a thromboprophylaxis after shoulder arthroscopy is unknown, but there are risks associated with its’ use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis (ASA) and mechanical prophylaxis vs. mechanical prophylaxis alone in preventing VTED following RCR. Methods: A total of 914 patients underwent RCR between the months of January 2010 and January 2015. A retrospective case control study was performed. The control group (n=484) consisted of patients treated with perioperative mechanical VTED prophylaxis (compression boots) and early mobilization. The study group (n=430) also utilized perioperative mechanical prophylaxis and early mobilization, and added chemical prophylaxis (ASA 81 mg daily) for four weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was symptomatic VTED (DVT/PE). Chart records were collected and evaluated for six months after surgery. Patient demographics and other surgical complications were also analyzed. Results: A total of 7 VTED events occurred during the study period, 6 DVTs and 1 PE. The total rate of VTED was 0.88%, DVT was 0.77%, and PE was 0.11%. There was no significant different between DVT (p=0.88, 95% CI= -1.36% - 1.65%) or PE (p=0.45, 95% CI = -0.77% - 1.50%) between the control and study groups. The control group (no ASA) recorded an incidence of 0.62% DVT and 0.00% PE. As compared to the study group (ASA), which recorded an incidence of 0.47% DVT and 0.23% PE. The control group had significantly greater number of documented current smokers (8.68% vs 3.72%, p= 0.0003). The study group had a statistically significant higher mean age of subject (59.1 vs 57.7, p=0.0055), as well as more subjects undergoing revision RCR surgery (4.67% vs 1.86%, p= 0.021). Conclusion: Based on our study of 914 patients, ASA does not provide a clinically significant reduction in VTED rates in patients undergoing RCR. We conclude that the use of mechanical prophylaxis and early mobilization is a sufficient method of VTED prophylaxis in this low risk population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Angeli Malavolta ◽  
Verônica Yulin Prieto Chang ◽  
Marcello TraballiBozzi Pinto de Castro ◽  
Fernando Brandao Andrade-Silva ◽  
Jorge Henrique Assunção ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of partial- and full-thickness upper third subscapularis tendon tears on the functional scores of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were divided into three groups according to the subscapularis tendon condition: intact, partial-thickness tear, or full-thickness upper third tear. Functional scores were compared among groups. Second, the influence of biceps and infraspinatus tears on the scores was tested using multivariate regression analysis. Results: We evaluated 307 shoulders in 297 patients. Full-thickness upper third subscapularis tears presented significantly worse scores than intact tendons. Partial-thickness tears had scores that did not differ significantly from those of the other groups. Patients with full-thickness upper third tears presented a greater rate of injured and unstable biceps tendons. The multivariate analysis showed that biceps and infraspinatus tendon tears did not influence the scores or the intergroup comparison. Conclusion: Full-thickness upper third subscapularis tendon tears presented worse functional scores than intact subscapularis tendons among patients undergoing posterosuperior rotator cuff repair. Patients with full-thickness subscapularis tears were more likely to suffer biceps tears, but this fact did not influence functional scores. Level of Evidence I; Clinical randomized trial


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukihiro Kajita ◽  
Yusuke Iwahori ◽  
Yohei Harada ◽  
Masataka Deie

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1056-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Witney-Lagen ◽  
Georgios Mazis ◽  
Juan Bruguera ◽  
Ehud Atoun ◽  
Giuseppe Sforza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document