scholarly journals Posterior shoulder tightness; an intersession reliability study of 3 clinical tests

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Hall ◽  
Jeremy Lewis ◽  
Ann Moore ◽  
Colette Ridehalgh
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koya Mine ◽  
Takashi Nakayama ◽  
Steve Milanese ◽  
Karen Grimmer

Context:Posterior shoulder tightness (PST) and glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit (GIRD) can contribute to shoulder pain suffered by athletes engaged in overhead sporting activities. Stretching is a common intervention to resolve PST and GIRD, but it has weak evidence of effectiveness to date.Objective:This systematic review aimed to collect and synthesize effectiveness data from English- and Japanese-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating stretching interventions for PST and GIRD.Evidence Acquisition:7 English databases and 3 Japanese databases were searched from inception until December 5, 2015. Only English- and Japanese-language RCTs were considered. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Data were synthesized qualitatively.Evidence Synthesis:Eight English-language and 2 Japanese-language papers of low to high quality were included. There was moderate evidence for positive immediate and short-term effects of cross-body stretch on PST and GIRD in asymptomatic young subjects. Moderate evidence was found to suggest that active sleeper stretch might not be more effective than no intervention to improve PST and GIRD in the short term.Conclusions:Cross-body stretch can be effective to improve PST and GIRD in asymptomatic young subjects immediately or in the short term. Further study with methodological rigor is necessary to investigate the long-term effectiveness of stretching interventions on PST and GIRD in symptomatic patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B Myers ◽  
Sakiko Oyama ◽  
Benjamin M Goerger ◽  
Terri Jo Rucinski ◽  
J Troy Blackburn ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 262-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy F. Tyler ◽  
Timothy Roy ◽  
Stephen J. Nicholas ◽  
Gilbert W. Gleim ◽  
George J. Davies ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Manske ◽  
Matt Meschke ◽  
Andrew Porter ◽  
Barbara Smith ◽  
Michael Reiman

Background: Posterior shoulder tightness, as demonstrated by limited internal rotation range of motion, is a suggested factor in many shoulder pathologies. Methods to increase posterior shoulder mobility may be beneficial. Hypothesis: Shoulder internal rotation range of motion will not change with either of 2 interventions: cross-body stretch alone and cross-body stretch plus posterior capsule joint mobilization. Study Design: Randomized controlled single-blinded clinical trial. Methods: The study comprised 39 college-age asymptomatic participants (7 men, 32 women) who were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: stretching only (n, 20) and stretching plus posterior joint mobilizations (n, 19). All had a between-shoulder difference of internal rotation of 10° or more. Shoulder internal and external rotation was measured before and after a 4-week intervention period and 4 weeks postintervention. Participants in the stretching-only group performed the cross-body stretch on the limited side. Those in the other group (cross-body stretch plus joint mobilization) were treated with posterior joint mobilization techniques on the limited side. Results: Overall means for internal rotation of the treated shoulders significantly increased over baseline at the end of the intervention period and at 4 weeks postintervention. External rotation in all shoulders remained unchanged. By the end of intervention, total motion increased significantly from baseline but decreased significantly from the end of intervention to 4 weeks postintervention. Although not statistically significant, the second group (cross-body stretch plus joint mobilization) had greater increases in internal rotation. At 4 weeks postintervention, the second group had maintained its internal rotation gains to a greater degree than those of the stretching-only group. Conclusion: Internal rotation increased in both groups. Inclusion of joint mobilization in a rehabilitation program created trends toward increased shoulder internal rotation mobility. Clinical Relevance: Both methods—cross-body stretch and cross-body stretch plus joint mobilization—may be beneficial for those with limited internal rotation range of motion.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy F. Tyler ◽  
Stephen J. Nicholas ◽  
Steven J. Lee ◽  
Michael Mullaney ◽  
Malachy P. McHugh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document