Geothermics of the Williston basin in Canada in relation to hydrodynamics and hydrocarbon occurrences

Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Majorowicz ◽  
F. W. Jones ◽  
A.M. Jessop

Over 8 400 bottom‐hole temperature (BHT) values from the Canadian part of the Williston Basin were analyzed and a temperature high was discovered in the Weyburn area of southeastern Saskatchewan. Geothermal gradients, thermal conductivities, and heat flow have been investigated for most of the Mesozoic‐Cenozoic clastic unit as well as the Upper Paleozoic carbonate‐evaporite unit. Regional heat flow variations with depth occur which are closely related to the hydrodynamics governed by the topography and geology. The blanketing effect of low‐conductivity shaly formations may cause a temperature anomaly in the south where the thickest Phanerozoic cover exists. However, the Weyburn high can be explained only partially in this way. Hydrodynamics has also contributed to formation of the temperature anomaly there. The process of forming the anomaly by the blanketing effect and hydrodynamics also contributed to oil deposition. There is a correlation between Mississippian oil occurrences in the southeastern part of the basin and the location of the Weyburn temperature high.

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-211
Author(s):  
Young-Keun Jin ◽  
Sang-Heon Nam ◽  
Yea-Dong Kim ◽  
Kyu-Jung Kim ◽  
Joo-Han Lee

1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Issler

Recorded maximum bottom-hole temperatures may vary significantly from true formation temperatures because of the effects of drilling fluid circulation. A theoretical temperature correction technique was applied to log-heading data to compute 191 static temperatures for 64 wells on the Scotian Shelf. A linear regression, performed on 140 computed temperatures, produced an average geothermal gradient of 2.66 °C/100 m; correlation coefficient 0.97. A geothermal gradient map constructed from the corrected data shows that areas of thicker sediment accumulation are marked by high geothermal gradients (e.g., Abenaki, Sable subbasins), whereas areas of shallow basement coincide with low gradients (e.g., LaHave Platform, Canso Ridge).It is proposed that the major control on the distribution of Scotian Shelf geothermal gradients is the thermal conductivity of the sediments. Radiogenic heat production within the sediments and subsurface fluid movement probably contribute to a lesser extent. Within the basins, higher heat flow due to thick salt accumulations at depth and the overall low conductivity of sediments above the salt lead to higher geothermal gradients. Low geothermal gradients in shallow basement areas are caused by the lack of salt and the relatively high conductivity of overlying sediments.A technique for calculating maturation levels of organic matter based on Lopatin's method and corrected bottom-hole temperatures was developed for the Scotian Shelf. A geologic model is constructed by considering the burial history of sediment for time invariant heat flow. From this, TTI (time–temperature index) values are derived to give the maturity level for specific sedimentary horizons. A comparison of 106 calculated TTI values with vitrinite reflectance measurements for 15 wells established a calibration of this technique for the Scotian Shelf. A correlation coefficient of 0.95 was obtained for the relation log TTI = 6.1841 log R0 + 2.6557.Maps showing the depth to calculated vitrinite reflectance values of 0.60 and 0.70% were constructed for the Scotian Shelf. It appears that burial rate, in addition to temperature, controls the location of various maturation levels. As one moves seaward, younger sediments increase in maturity and the oil window thickens. At equivalent depths, sediments at the basin margins are more mature than those farther seaward in the deeper parts of the basin. Sediments of the Canso Ridge area and over much of the LaHave Platform, excluding local downfaulted basins, have not attained sufficient maturity to have generated significant quantities of oil.TTI calibrations were established for the Labrador Shelf, the Grand Banks of Newfoundland, and the Canning Basin of Western Australia as above. Results indicate that tectonic history plays an important role in the calibration and that the slope of calibration lines may represent the departure from true time–temperature conditions in the modeling. Changes in heat flow with time lead to incorrect estimates of maturity when present-day geothermal gradients are used to approximate past temperature conditions. Also, uncertainties in the amount of erosion produce error in maturity estimates. The Scotian Shelf TTI calibration may be applicable to much of offshore eastern North America and parts of offshore western Europe and Africa.


Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Chapman ◽  
T. H. Keho ◽  
Michael S. Bauer ◽  
M. Dane Picard

The thermal resistance (or Bullard) method is used to judge the utility of petroleum well bottom‐hole temperature data in determining surface heat flow and subsurface temperature patterns in a sedimentary basin. Thermal resistance, defined as the quotient of a depth parameter Δz and thermal conductivity k, governs subsurface temperatures as follows: [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is the temperature at depth z=B, [Formula: see text] is the surface temperature, [Formula: see text] is surface heat flow, and the thermal resistance (Δz/k) is summed for all rock units between the surface and depth B. In practice, bottom‐hole and surface temperatures are combined with a measured or estimated thermal conductivity profile to determine the surface heat flow [Formula: see text] which, in turn, is used for all consequent subsurface temperature computations. The method has been applied to the Tertiary Uinta Basin, northeastern Utah, a basin of intermediate geologic complexity—simple structure but complex facies relationships—where considerable well data are available. Bottom‐hole temperatures were obtained for 97 selected wells where multiple well logs permitted correction of temperatures for drilling effects. Thermal conductivity values, determined for 852 samples from 5 representative wells varying in depth from 670 to 5180 m, together with available geologic data were used to produce conductivity maps for each formation. These maps show intraformational variations across the basin that are associated with lateral facies changes. Formation thicknesses needed for the thermal resistance summation were obtained by utilizing approximately 2000 wells in the WEXPRO Petroleum Information file. Computations were facilitated by describing all formation contacts as fourth‐order polynomial surfaces. Average geothermal gradient and heat flow for the Uinta Basin are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. Heat flow appears to decrease systematically from 65 to [Formula: see text] from the Duchesne River northward toward the south flank of the Uinta Mountains. This decrease may be the result of refraction of heat into the highly conductive quartzose Precambrian Uinta Mountain Group. More likely, however, it is related to groundwater recharge in late Paleozoic and Mesozoic sandstone and limestone beds that flank the south side of the Uintas. Heat flow values determined for the southeast portion of the basin show some scatter about a mean value of [Formula: see text] but no systematic variation.


Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Majorowicz ◽  
F. W. Jones ◽  
A. S. Judge

In our studies of the thermal regime of sediments of the young Mackenzie Delta in the southeastern part of the Beaufort-Mackenzie basin of northern Canada, we used thermal data from the base of the permafrost layer, together with temperature data from petroleum wells. By analyzing bottom-hole temperature (BHT) data, we found that the percentage correction, i.e., the percentage difference between BHT and equilibrium temperature, is less than 10% ((with 67% probability) for times exceeding 10 hours after circulation ended, regardless of circulation time. No correlation exists between the percentage correction and depths for the BHT data. Theoretical temperature-depth profiles were constructed from the individual heat flow Q, Q [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] values (δQ is error of estimate of Q), the interval thermal conductivities, and a permafrost base temperature of 0°C. Estimates of Q were based on the maximum BHTs from depths >2.7 km. The measured and corrected BHT values for depths less than 1.5 km lie outside the range defined by the predicted temperature and temperature at the base of permafrost. Therefore, the temperature gradient based on interval‐temperature difference between deep and shallow BHTs or ground‐surface temperature and shallow BHTs may not represent the thermal field accurately within the sedimentary strata. The temperature data from the maximum depths, the permafrost base temperature of 0 °C from the 10 deep wells, and estimated thermal conductivities for the sedimentary column give an average heat flow [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] (error of estimate of the individual Q value, [Formula: see text]), which is comparable to the values found in the region of the Canada basin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document