scholarly journals Diffraction imaging and time-migration velocity analysis using oriented velocity continuation

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. U25-U35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Decker ◽  
Dmitrii Merzlikin ◽  
Sergey Fomel
Keyword(s):  
Field Data ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Fourier Domain ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Specular Reflections ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Time Space ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Diffraction Imaging ◽  
Migration Velocities

We perform seismic diffraction imaging and time-migration velocity analysis by separating diffractions from specular reflections and decomposing them into slope components. We image the slope components using migration velocity extrapolation in time-space-slope coordinates. The extrapolation is described by a convection-type partial differential equation and implemented in a highly parallel manner in the Fourier domain. Synthetic and field data experiments show that the proposed algorithms are able to detect accurate time-migration velocities by measuring the flatness of diffraction events in slope gathers for single- and multiple-offset data.

Migration velocity analysis with the Kirchhoff integral

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Kim ◽  
R. Gonzalez
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Amplitude ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Downward Continuation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Prestack Time Migration ◽  
Zero Offset ◽  
Kirchhoff Integral ◽  
Migration Velocities

To obtain accurate migration velocities, we must estimate the velocity at migrated depth points. Wavefront focusing analysis with downward continuation yields the rms velocity at migrated depth points; however, the large amount of computation required for downward continuation limits use of this approach for routine processing. The purpose of this paper is to present an implementation of the Kirchhoff integral which makes the wavefront focusing analysis practical for time‐migration velocity analysis. Downward continuation focuses the wavefront to the zero offset at the depth controlled by the velocity used for the continuation. The migration velocity is then determined from the depth where the focused wavefront attains the maximum amplitude. The flexibility of the Kirchhoff integral allows us to compute only the zero‐offset trace at each depth point and lets us avoid most of the computation for the downward continuation of unstacked data. Furthermore, since the velocity is obtained from the location where the focused wavefront shows the maximum amplitude, prestack time migration with the velocity from this technique produces the maximum amplitude for the subsurface reflector.

Time‐migration velocity analysis by velocity continuation

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1662-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Fomel
Keyword(s):  
Field Data ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Spectral Algorithms ◽  
Seismic Sections ◽  
Normal Moveout Correction ◽  
Seismic Images ◽  
Incremental Process

Time‐migration velocity analysis can be performed by velocity continuation, an incremental process that transforms migrated seismic sections according to changes in the migration velocity. Velocity continuation enhances residual normal moveout correction by properly taking into account both vertical and lateral movements of events on seismic images. Finite‐difference and spectral algorithms provide efficient practical implementations for velocity continuation. Synthetic and field data examples demonstrate the performance of the method and confirm theoretical expectations.

Automatic anisotropic migration velocity analysis for reverse-time migration

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiktor Weibull ◽  
Børge Arntsen ◽  
Marianne Houbiers ◽  
Joachim Mispel
Keyword(s):  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis

Migration velocity analysis based on focusing diffractions generated using the CRS wavefront attributes: Application to real land data

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-50
Author(s):  
German Garabito ◽  
José Silas dos Santos Silva ◽  
Williams Lima
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Normal Incidence ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
The Time Domain

In land seismic data processing, the prestack time migration (PSTM) image remains the standard imaging output, but a reliable migrated image of the subsurface depends on the accuracy of the migration velocity model. We have adopted two new algorithms for time-domain migration velocity analysis based on wavefield attributes of the common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack method. These attributes, extracted from multicoverage data, were successfully applied to build the velocity model in the depth domain through tomographic inversion of the normal-incidence-point (NIP) wave. However, there is no practical and reliable method for determining an accurate and geologically consistent time-migration velocity model from these CRS attributes. We introduce an interactive method to determine the migration velocity model in the time domain based on the application of NIP wave attributes and the CRS stacking operator for diffractions, to generate synthetic diffractions on the reflection events of the zero-offset (ZO) CRS stacked section. In the ZO data with diffractions, the poststack time migration (post-STM) is applied with a set of constant velocities, and the migration velocities are then selected through a focusing analysis of the simulated diffractions. We also introduce an algorithm to automatically calculate the migration velocity model from the CRS attributes picked for the main reflection events in the ZO data. We determine the precision of our diffraction focusing velocity analysis and the automatic velocity calculation algorithms using two synthetic models. We also applied them to real 2D land data with low quality and low fold to estimate the time-domain migration velocity model. The velocity models obtained through our methods were validated by applying them in the Kirchhoff PSTM of real data, in which the velocity model from the diffraction focusing analysis provided significant improvements in the quality of the migrated image compared to the legacy image and to the migrated image obtained using the automatically calculated velocity model.

Time-migration velocity analysis by image-wave propagation of common-image gathers

Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. VE161-VE171 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schleicher ◽  
J. C. Costa ◽  
A. Novais
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Seismic Event ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Reference Velocity ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Image ◽  
The Common

Image-wave propagation or velocity continuation describes the variation of the migrated position of a seismic event as a function of migration velocity. Image-wave propagation in the common-image gather (CIG) domain can be combined with residual-moveout analysis for iterative migration velocity analysis (MVA). Velocity continuation of CIGs leads to a detection of those velocities in which events flatten. Although image-wave continuation is based on the assumption of a constant migration velocity, the procedure can be applied in inhomogeneous media. For this purpose, CIGs obtained by migration with an inhomogeneous macrovelocity model are continued starting from a constant reference velocity. The interpretation of continued CIGs, as if they were obtained from residual migrations, leads to a correction formula that translates residual flattening velocities into absolute time-migration velocities. In this way, the migration velocity model can be improved iteratively until a satisfactory result is reached. With a numerical example, we found that MVA with iterative image continuation applied exclusively to selected CIGs can construct a reasonable migration velocity model from scratch, without the need to build an initial model from a previous conventional normal-moveout/dip-moveout velocity analysis.

Angle-domain common-image gathers from plane-wave least-squares reverse time migration

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-60
Author(s):  
Chuang Li ◽  
Zhaoqi Gao ◽  
Jinghuai Gao ◽  
Feipeng Li ◽  
Tao Yang
Keyword(s):  
Inverse Problem ◽  
Plane Wave ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Amplitude Versus

Angle-domain common-image gathers (ADCIGs) that can be used for migration velocity analysis and amplitude versus angle analysis are important for seismic exploration. However, because of limited acquisition geometry and seismic frequency band, the ADCIGs extracted by reverse time migration (RTM) suffer from illumination gaps, migration artifacts, and low resolution. We have developed a reflection angle-domain pseudo-extended plane-wave least-squares RTM method for obtaining high-quality ADCIGs. We build the mapping relations between the ADCIGs and the plane-wave sections using an angle-domain pseudo-extended Born modeling operator and an adjoint operator, based on which we formulate the extraction of ADCIGs as an inverse problem. The inverse problem is iteratively solved by a preconditioned stochastic conjugate gradient method, allowing for reduction in computational cost by migrating only a subset instead of the whole dataset and improving image quality thanks to preconditioners. Numerical tests on synthetic and field data verify that the proposed method can compensate for illumination gaps, suppress migration artifacts, and improve resolution of the ADCIGs and the stacked images. Therefore, compared with RTM, the proposed method provides a more reliable input for migration velocity analysis and amplitude versus angle analysis. Moreover, it also provides much better stacked images for seismic interpretation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document